; edwin.verpla...@intel.com; keith.wi...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
> subsystem
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:35:00PM +, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wang Xiang
df...@tencent.com;
> liuzho...@chinaunicom.cn; zhaoyon...@huawei.com; o...@yunify.com;
> j...@netgate.com; Ni, Hongjun ; j.bromhead@titan-
> ic.com; d...@ntop.org; f...@napatech.com; arthur...@lionic.com; Guy Kaneti
> ; Smadar Fuks ; Liron Himi
> ; edwin.verpla...@intel.com; keith.w
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:35:00PM +, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wang Xiang
> >
> > Hi Jerin,
> >
> > Thanks for your response. More comments below and inline.
> >
> > 1) I think the size of some varaibles (e.g. nb_matches, scan_size, matching
#x27;zhaoyon...@huawei.com' ; 'o...@yunify.com'
> ; 'j...@netgate.com' ;
> 'hongjun...@intel.com' ; 'j.bromh...@titan-ic.com'
> ; 'd...@ntop.org' ;
> 'f...@napatech.com' ; 'arthur...@lionic.com'
>
> Subject: R
Wednesday, October 2, 2019 11:32 AM, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
> subsystem
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shahaf Shuler
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 11:23 AM
> > To: J
#x27;zhaoyon...@huawei.com' ; 'o...@yunify.com'
> ; 'j...@netgate.com' ;
> 'hongjun...@intel.com' ; 'j.bromh...@titan-ic.com'
> ; 'd...@ntop.org' ;
> 'f...@napatech.com' ; 'arthur...@lionic.com'
>
> Subje
ate.com; hongjun...@intel.com; j.bromh...@titan-ic.com;
> > d...@ntop.org; f...@napatech.com; arthur...@lionic.com
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
> > subsystem
> >
> > > Hi Jerin,
> >
> > Hi Shahaf,
>
ainfo.com;
> davidf...@tencent.com; liuzho...@chinaunicom.cn;
> zhaoyon...@huawei.com; o...@yunify.com; j...@netgate.com;
> hongjun...@intel.com; j.bromh...@titan-ic.com; d...@ntop.org;
> f...@napatech.com; arthur...@lionic.com
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: intro
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang Xiang
>
> Hi Jerin,
>
> Thanks for your response. More comments below and inline.
>
> 1) I think the size of some varaibles (e.g. nb_matches, scan_size, matching
> offset, etc) should be increased based on what Hyperscan supports.
>
> a) struct rte
Hi Jerin,
Thanks for your response. More comments below and inline.
1) I think the size of some varaibles (e.g. nb_matches, scan_size,
matching offset, etc) should be increased based on what Hyperscan supports.
a) struct rte_regex_ops:
uint16_t scan_size => uint32_t scan_size
> Hi Jerin,
Hi Shahaf,
Sorry for delay in response(Was busy with 19.11 proposal deadline). Please see
inline.
> >
> > RegEx pattern matching applications:
> > • Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW)
> > • Deep Packet and Flow Inspection (DPI)
> > • Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)
> > • DDoS Mitig
> Hi Jerin,
>
> Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
> > subsystem
> >
> > +Cc more
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jerin Jacob
> &
Hi Xiang,
Sorry for delay in response(Was busy with 19.11 proposal deadline). Please see
inline.
>
> Reply to Xiang's queries in main thread:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some questions regarding APIs. Could you please give more insights?
>
> 1) rte_regex_ops
> a) rsp_flags
> These two flags
To book a meeting: https://calendly.com/johnbromhead/titanic
On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Shahaf Shuler
mailto:shah...@mellanox.com>> wrote:
Hi Jerin,
Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
subsystem
+Cc more
-
Hi Jerin,
Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] regexdev: introduce regexdev
> subsystem
>
> +Cc more
>
>
>
> From: Jerin Jacob
>
> Even though there are some vendors which offer Regex HW offl
com.cn; lixin...@huachentel.com;
> wush...@inspur.com; yuying...@yxlink.com;
> fanchengg...@sunyainfo.com; davidf...@tencent.com;
> liuzho...@chinaunicom.cn; zhaoyon...@huawei.com; o...@yunify.com;
> j...@netgate.com; hongjun...@intel.com; j.bromh...@titan-ic.com;
&g
angy@chinatelecom.cn; lixin...@huachentel.com;
> wush...@inspur.com; yuying...@yxlink.com;
> fanchengg...@sunyainfo.com; davidf...@tencent.com;
> liuzho...@chinaunicom.cn; zhaoyon...@huawei.com; o...@yunify.com;
> j...@netgate.com; hongjun...@intel.com; j.bromh...@titan-ic.com;
>
+Cc more
From: Jerin Jacob
Even though there are some vendors which offer Regex HW offload, due to
lack of standard API, It is diffcult for DPDK consumer to use them
in a portable way.
This _RFC_ attempts to standardize the RegEx/DPI offload APIs for DPDK.
The Doxygen generate
+Cc other interested vendors
+Cc contributors to µDPI project in fd.io
27/06/2019 17:50, jer...@marvell.com:
> From: Jerin Jacob
>
> Even though there are some vendors which offer Regex HW offload, due to
> lack of standard API, It is diffcult for DPDK consumer to use them
> in a portable way.
>
Ping.
Is anyone interested to collaborate on this RFC[2]?
Marvell would like to contribute on one SW(PCRE based) PMD and HW PMD for this
API.
Shahaf from Mellanox proposed a presentation on DPDK Regex device for upcoming
user space summit[1] so
It would be good to iron out the differences in va
20 matches
Mail list logo
