Re: shouldn't we only define one groupId per-platform?

2017-10-18 Thread Dale LaBossiere
Hi Chris, I convinced myself this just made sense so I committed the changes :-) I can back them out if you think groupId-per-platform is a mistake. With these changes also comes the opportunity to make the j8,j7,android poms more closely resemble each other and also changes that may lessen

Re: shouldn't we only define one groupId per-platform?

2017-10-18 Thread Dale LaBossiere
Chris, I’ve got everything working in my workspace and I’ll commit it once you verify the switch is desirable. (got the distribution stuff working — the include/exclude decls support GAV pattern matching) — Dale >> On Oct 17, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Dale LaBossiere >

Re: shouldn't we only define one groupId per-platform?

2017-10-17 Thread Dale LaBossiere
Chris, Everything is working fine with groupid-per-platform except -Pdistribution. I haven’t looked into how to deal with it yet, but it leveraged the groupId being different for the distribution project in order to exclude it. Maybe there’s a further specification to enable excluding the

Re: shouldn't we only define one groupId per-platform?

2017-10-17 Thread Dale LaBossiere
FWIW, In my workspace I’ve made the changes to switch to a single groupId-per-platform and so far I haven’t run into any issues. I’ll report a full conclusion after exercising everything. — Dale > On Oct 17, 2017, at 8:37 PM, Dale LaBossiere wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Was