Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

Hello Myrle, I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more information about Fineract CN. Thanks Gaurav On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > Hey Fineract Community, > > This is just an FYI for the community: > > Last week I was in Hamburg

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

Hi Myrle. I am interested in the slides. Please share it with me. On Sep 14, 2017 8:18 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: Hey Fineract Community, This is just an FYI for the community: Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference. I did a presentation on

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

+1 Regards Mohit On 14 September 2017 at 12:53, Gaurav Saini wrote: > Hello Myrle, > > I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more information > about Fineract CN. > > Thanks > Gaurav > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz

FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

Hey Fineract Community, This is just an FYI for the community: Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference. I did a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract CN example. This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last year but with some added

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

Oh my, I wasn't expecting a response as immediate and enthusiastic as this. : o) Here's the microservices presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qn5GyCk30nom5LuYXPjuQF5gdIEwrLie2SpIyo-dMuc/edit?usp=sharing And here's the incubator presentation:

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

+1 and thanks for sharing On 14 Sep 2017 10:31, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: > Oh my, > > I wasn't expecting a response as immediate and enthusiastic as this. : o) > > Here's the microservices presentation: > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qn5GyCk30nom5LuYXPjuQF5gdIEwr >

Issue Apache Fineract-FINERACT-419

Hi Team, While going through this ticket I found it's working in my local machine. The description is given as follows in the ticket:- 1. Create a client with Legal Form=Entity and assign this client a value from the Main Business Line. Save. 2. Edit this client and try to remove Main Business

[jira] [Assigned] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shaik Nazeer Hussain reassigned FINERACT-517: - Assignee: Santosh Math (was: Markus Geiss) > "Recalculate Interest

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166207#comment-16166207 ] Shaik Nazeer Hussain commented on FINERACT-517: --- when we do payment for 01 February 2017 ,

[jira] [Resolved] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shaik Nazeer Hussain resolved FINERACT-517. --- Resolution: Not A Problem Hi Santosh, can you re verify this issue please.

Re: PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

@Both: Just e-mail to dev-*un*subscr...@fineract.apache.org. This is the same process you've followed when you subscribed, but with the 2 letters in bold being the difference. Sander van der Heyden CTO Musoni Services Mobile (NL): +31 (0)6 14239505 Skype: s.vdheyden Website:

Re: Upping our truck factor

Hello All, >>> 1.) Are you doing something that only you are doing, and that you >>> believe should be shared more widely? No >>> 2.) What are the reasons why you aren't doing one of the activities on >>> our "bottleneck" list? I am currently focusing on a few other things I really want to do

Re: PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

STOP On 14-Sep-2017 7:56 pm, "Erin Sobkow" wrote: > Hi: > > > > I asked once to be taken off your contact list a few weeks ago and I am > still receiving emails from people daily. Please remove me from your email > list. Thank-you. > > > > *Erin Sobkow, BA Kin, RMT*

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167311#comment-16167311 ] Santosh Math commented on FINERACT-517: --- [~nazeer1100126], if scheduler job ' Recalculate Interest

PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

Hi: I asked once to be taken off your contact list a few weeks ago and I am still receiving emails from people daily. Please remove me from your email list. Thank-you. Erin Sobkow, BA Kin, RMT Community Consultant Parkland Valley Sport, Culture & Recreation District Box 263,

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

Nazeer, I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan about when PPI will be available. Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on August 3? Thanks, Ed On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable wrote: > Nazeer, > > Can

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

Hi Ed, Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago here: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406 He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did it. Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by tomorrow

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

Oh that is great it was fixed. Raunak, with that blocker addressed - what remains to get survey responses properly stored? Was this it? It sounds like we have all 4 points that Nathan needed met, no? Ed On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Math < sant...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: >

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

How I wish I was technical enough to handle some of these things. Normally when PRs are sent they stay long enough and i wish I have all the expertise to handle this, a sent PR will not take more than one day and will be merged if approved. On 14 Sep 2017 09:15, "Santosh Math"

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

@Ed Yes, once the PR is merged I think that should be enough from the platform side for nathan, and I can take up further enhancement work on the front end. On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Ippez Robert wrote: > How I wish I was technical enough to handle some of these

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

Dear Robert, I concur and subscribe to your comments; We would still though suggest Mr. Nazeer to continue support us, while we continue building that capability to support him!!! Regards Sendoro - Original Message - From: "Ippez Robert" To: "dev"

Need for help in reviewing PRs

Hi all, Once again not to sound like a broken record but echoing the same sentiments in my previous email about the need for help in GSOC reviews. The need for members of the PMC to review pull requests in general extends beyond just these Google Summer of Code contributions. Nazeer, could use