Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
I was notified too that I was added :) El mar., 8 ene. 2019 a las 10:11, Olaf Krueger () escribió: > > It looks like they have started doing something > > Yes, seems to be done ;-) > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
> It looks like they have started doing something Yes, seems to be done ;-) -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-08 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
It looks like they have started doing something cause I was added to gitbox Flex repository as a committeer :) On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 8:31 PM Olaf Krueger wrote: > Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574 > > Olaf > > > >

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-07 Thread Olaf Krueger
Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
I think is ok too. the sooner the better thank! :) PS:About website, maybe Nick is aware of this so he can make the changes as usual? El sáb., 5 ene. 2019 a las 11:09, Piotr Zarzycki () escribió: > No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start! > > Piotr > > On Fri,

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-05 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start! Piotr On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, 6:42 PM Alex Harui wrote: > Let's try it this way. I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means > that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have > consensus and will