Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
I was notified too that I was added :) El mar., 8 ene. 2019 a las 10:11, Olaf Krueger () escribió: > > It looks like they have started doing something > > Yes, seems to be done ;-) > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
> It looks like they have started doing something Yes, seems to be done ;-) -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
It looks like they have started doing something cause I was added to gitbox Flex repository as a committeer :) On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 8:31 PM Olaf Krueger wrote: > Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574 > > Olaf > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ >
Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
I think is ok too. the sooner the better thank! :) PS:About website, maybe Nick is aware of this so he can make the changes as usual? El sáb., 5 ene. 2019 a las 11:09, Piotr Zarzycki () escribió: > No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start! > > Piotr > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, 6:42 PM Alex Harui wrote: > > > Let's try it this way. I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means > > that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have > > consensus and will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done > ASAP. > > > > I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive. > > We're not in the middle of a release or lots of changes. Maybe we won't > > even change the website until someone complains just to see if anyone > > actually goes to those pages. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: > > > > Hi Carlos, > > yes, the migration is mandatory. > > They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings. > > > > But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it > > before > > this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible. > > Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before > > February 7th. > > > > Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that > > INFRA > > could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other > > communities. > > > > If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a > > consensus > > about this and we need to inform INFRA. > > To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way. > > > > Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-) > > > > Thanks, > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3Dreserved=0 > > > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start! Piotr On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, 6:42 PM Alex Harui wrote: > Let's try it this way. I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means > that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have > consensus and will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done ASAP. > > I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive. > We're not in the middle of a release or lots of changes. Maybe we won't > even change the website until someone complains just to see if anyone > actually goes to those pages. > > My 2 cents, > -Alex > > On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > yes, the migration is mandatory. > They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings. > > But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it > before > this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible. > Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before > February 7th. > > Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that > INFRA > could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other > communities. > > If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a > consensus > about this and we need to inform INFRA. > To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way. > > Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-) > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from: > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3Dreserved=0 > > >
