Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Hi Rui,

Are you not allowed to consider 'beta' frameworks?  That's an interesting
data point.
The supposed advantage of working with open source at Apache is that you
can directly influence the development of the code including stabilizing
the parts you need.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/15/17, 6:06 AM, "Rui Cruz"  wrote:

>I think the name doesn't really matter.. all I want is a solid trustable
>framework.. if it uses as3 instead of typescript? better than... lately
>I've been porting a complete app from as3 to typescript (all I wanted is
>that FlexJS had a stable release no matter the name..)
>
>my 2 cents
>
>2017-09-15 11:08 GMT+01:00 Kessler CTR Mark J :
>
>> No (binding)
>>
>>
>> The project name should not contain Flex or JS.  The flex change because
>> it’s separating the name and the JS because we do more than JS.
>>
>>
>> -Mark K
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:37 AM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>
>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>
>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>> discussed.
>> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>
>rporate.com=02%7C01%7C%7Cfe343ddd38a24423d42d08d4fc3ad9fd%7Cfa7b1b5a7
>b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410777074746781=LtxpIXKh9LKv0%2
>FKBy0nDfldgZq4lKrDufaZHPEryesU%3D=0>
>Rui Cruz
>IT department
>Senior Developer
>
>
>Zona Industrial de Tuías
>Rua 2 - Nº 90, 4630-489
>Marco de Canaveses
>t. +351 255 539 230
>f. +351 255 539 249
>rui.c...@lfmcorporate.com
>
>Este "e-mail" junto com qualquer ficheiro anexo, é para uso exclusivo e
>confidencial do destinatário e pode conter informação legalmente
>privilegiada. Qualquer distribuição, uso ou reprodução sem consentimento
>do
>remetente está estritamente proibida. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano,
>por favor informe o remetente por "e-mail" e apague esta mensagem do seu
>computador sem fazer nenhuma cópia.
>
>This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and
>confidential use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged
>information. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without the
>sender's prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you
>have
>received this message in error, please notify the sender by e-mail
>immediately and delete the message from your computer without making any
>copies.
>rporate.com=02%7C01%7C%7Cfe343ddd38a24423d42d08d4fc3ad9fd%7Cfa7b1b5a7
>b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410777074746781=LtxpIXKh9LKv0%2
>FKBy0nDfldgZq4lKrDufaZHPEryesU%3D=0>

RE: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Chris Martin]

Yes - binding

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Dave Fisher
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 8:37 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
[ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.

The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Carlos Rovira]

No (Binding)

2017-09-15 15:06 GMT+02:00 Rui Cruz :

> I think the name doesn't really matter.. all I want is a solid trustable
> framework.. if it uses as3 instead of typescript? better than... lately
> I've been porting a complete app from as3 to typescript (all I wanted is
> that FlexJS had a stable release no matter the name..)
>
> my 2 cents
>
> 2017-09-15 11:08 GMT+01:00 Kessler CTR Mark J :
>
> > No (binding)
> >
> >
> > The project name should not contain Flex or JS.  The flex change because
> > it’s separating the name and the JS because we do more than JS.
> >
> >
> > -Mark K
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:37 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> >
> > VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> >
> > [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> > [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> > discussed.
> > [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> 
> Rui Cruz
> IT department
> Senior Developer
>
>
> Zona Industrial de Tuías
> Rua 2 - Nº 90, 4630-489
> Marco de Canaveses
> t. +351 255 539 230
> f. +351 255 539 249
> rui.c...@lfmcorporate.com
>
> Este "e-mail" junto com qualquer ficheiro anexo, é para uso exclusivo e
> confidencial do destinatário e pode conter informação legalmente
> privilegiada. Qualquer distribuição, uso ou reprodução sem consentimento do
> remetente está estritamente proibida. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano,
> por favor informe o remetente por "e-mail" e apague esta mensagem do seu
> computador sem fazer nenhuma cópia.
>
> This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and
> confidential use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged
> information. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without the
> sender's prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by e-mail
> immediately and delete the message from your computer without making any
> copies.
> 
>



-- 



Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! 


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Rui Cruz]

I think the name doesn't really matter.. all I want is a solid trustable
framework.. if it uses as3 instead of typescript? better than... lately
I've been porting a complete app from as3 to typescript (all I wanted is
that FlexJS had a stable release no matter the name..)

my 2 cents

2017-09-15 11:08 GMT+01:00 Kessler CTR Mark J :

> No (binding)
>
>
> The project name should not contain Flex or JS.  The flex change because
> it’s separating the name and the JS because we do more than JS.
>
>
> -Mark K
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:37 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>
>


-- 



Rui Cruz
IT department
Senior Developer


Zona Industrial de Tuías
Rua 2 - Nº 90, 4630-489
Marco de Canaveses
t. +351 255 539 230
f. +351 255 539 249
rui.c...@lfmcorporate.com

Este "e-mail" junto com qualquer ficheiro anexo, é para uso exclusivo e
confidencial do destinatário e pode conter informação legalmente
privilegiada. Qualquer distribuição, uso ou reprodução sem consentimento do
remetente está estritamente proibida. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano,
por favor informe o remetente por "e-mail" e apague esta mensagem do seu
computador sem fazer nenhuma cópia.

This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and
confidential use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged
information. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without the
sender's prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender by e-mail
immediately and delete the message from your computer without making any
copies.

RE: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Kessler CTR Mark J]

No (binding)


The project name should not contain Flex or JS.  The flex change because it’s 
separating the name and the JS because we do more than JS.


-Mark K

-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:37 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
[ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.

The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I can see there good reasons for a name change and also a good number for not 
changing the name. I wouldn’t underestimate the effort needed to change the 
name and the impact this would have on current users. It’s not an easy to 
decide but I’m more on the yes side than no side but it’s not a particularly 
strongly held view.

Yes (binding)

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Christofer Dutz]

I really feel silly about this seems I'm the only one up to now. But as I do 
tend to think the name FlexJS is a good name and I know what getting rid of 
"flex" everywhere inside the project would mean regarding refactoring and tool 
support.

Yes (Binding)

Chris

On 2017-09-14 17:37, Dave Fisher  wrote: 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Olaf Krueger]

No (Binding) 

On 2017-09-14 08:37, Dave Fisher <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? 
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. 
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed. 
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called. 
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT. 



--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Harbs]

+1 from me.

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
> 
>> No (binding)
>> 
>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>> 
>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>> 
>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>> discussed.
>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I see the consensus already,I'm sorry for the noise and insist for the VOTE
guys. We may start VOTE on, a new name. Some folks were for YES to the old
one, but I see that they are also open for the new name.

Piotr

2017-09-14 20:28 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
>
> >No (binding)
> >
> >On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
> >
> >>VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> >>
> >>[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> >>[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> >>discussed.
> >>[ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> >>
> >>The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I don't
want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:

>No (binding)
>
>On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>
>>VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>
>>[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>discussed.
>>[ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>
>>The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Peter Ent]

No (binding)

On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

>VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
>[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>discussed.
>[ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>
>The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Erik de Bruin]

No (binding)

EdB



On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Mihai Chira]

Abstain

On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:37 Dave Fisher  wrote:

> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[David Fisher]

No (Binding)

On 2017-09-14 08:37, Dave Fisher  wrote: 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

No
(binding)

On Sep 14, 2017 8:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
discussed.
[ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.

The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.