ule, not only for
good-looking, for its duty.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Maximilian Michels [mailto:m...@apache.org]
发送时间: 2016年9月26日 16:33
收件人: dev@flink.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: [discuss] merge module flink-yarn and flink-yarn-test
Hello Jinkui Shi,
Due to the nature of most of the Yarn tests, we nee
ask why they are exist? Where is the start of such confusion
> > modules?
> >
> > I think we shouldn't do nothing for this. Code and design should be
> > comfortable.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > From Jinkui Shi
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> &g
uch confusion
> modules?
>
> I think we shouldn't do nothing for this. Code and design should be
> comfortable.
>
> Thanks
>
> From Jinkui Shi
>
> -邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Stephan Ewen [mailto:se...@apache.org]
> 发送时间: 2016年9月21日 22:19
> 收件人: dev@flink.apach
x27;t do nothing for this. Code and design should be comfortable.
Thanks
From Jinkui Shi
-邮件原件-
发件人: Stephan Ewen [mailto:se...@apache.org]
发送时间: 2016年9月21日 22:19
收件人: dev@flink.apache.org
主题: Re: [discuss] merge module flink-yarn and flink-yarn-test
I would like Robert to comment on this.
I would like Robert to comment on this.
I think there was a reason to have different modules, which had again
something to do with the Maven Shade Plugin
Dependencies and shading really seem the trickiest thing in bigger
Java/Scala projects ;-)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:04 AM, shijinkui wrote:
Hi, All
There too much module in the root. There are no necessary to separate the test
code from sub-module.
I never see such design: two modules, one is main code, the other is test code.
Is there some special reason?
>From Jinkui Shi
