To sum up the activity in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12456:
Bit of a bummer, we will have to work on the Perl script which
publishes the notifications. If I find some time I might do that but
volunteers are welcome:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/infra?p=asfgit-admin.git;a=bl
Sorry for late reply, but +1 too
This should still provide tracking of discussion from Github PR and reduce
the noise at the same time.
Thanks for working on it, Max.
- Henry
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Max!
>
> 2016-09-02 15:20 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen :
>
> > Sounds good to me!
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Maximilian Michels
> wrote:
> >
> > > If there are no objections, I will contact Infra to change the GitHub
+1
Thanks Max!
2016-09-02 15:20 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen :
> Sounds good to me!
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
> > If there are no objections, I will contact Infra to change the GitHub
> > JIRA notifications as follows:
> >
> > Jira comments section
> > - initia
Sounds good to me!
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will contact Infra to change the GitHub
> JIRA notifications as follows:
>
> Jira comments section
> - initial PR description
> - comments of the main GitHub thread
>
> Jira Work Log
If there are no objections, I will contact Infra to change the GitHub
JIRA notifications as follows:
Jira comments section
- initial PR description
- comments of the main GitHub thread
Jira Work Log
- all diff comments
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>> Will wo
> Will work log updates still lead to notifications on the mailing list?
I don't know but it is most likely configurable. I would prefer if we
didn't get notifications for work log items because these would again
be duplicates of the GitHub notifications.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Neelesh
Thanks Max for coordinating the effort.
+1 as well.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> +1
>
> I didn't know that we can put the comments into the work log.
> Will work log updates still lead to notifications on the mailing list?
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Maximi
+1
I didn't know that we can put the comments into the work log.
Will work log updates still lead to notifications on the mailing list?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> From what I understand so far, the message mirroring can be adjusted
> in the follow parts:
>
> 1
>From what I understand so far, the message mirroring can be adjusted
in the follow parts:
1) GitHub PR description
2) GitHub Diff comments
3) GitHub Main thread comments
We can choose to put these as
1) The full GitHub comment
2) Only supply a link to the GitHub comment
Next, we can store all
Sure, I've filed a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12456
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> @max - can you contact infra about that?
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
>> Actually that is a good suggestion. I know from other A
@max - can you contact infra about that?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Actually that is a good suggestion. I know from other Apache projects
> that they only mirror the initial description of the pull request but
> not the discussion. I agree with you that it's ve
Actually that is a good suggestion. I know from other Apache projects
that they only mirror the initial description of the pull request but
not the discussion. I agree with you that it's very hard to have
meaningful discussion in JIRA if it is overlapped with GitHub
comments.
Cheers,
Max
On Wed,
13 matches
Mail list logo
