The issue persists with 1.9.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14470
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:47 AM Jan Lukavský wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'd very much love to, but because I run my pipeline with Beam, I'm
> afraid I will have to wait a little longer, before Beam has runner for
> 1
Hi Robert,
I'd very much love to, but because I run my pipeline with Beam, I'm
afraid I will have to wait a little longer, before Beam has runner for
1.9 [1]. I'm pretty sure that the watermarks disappeared with overall
parallelism (over all operators) something above 2000. There was quite a
Jan, will you be able to test this issue on the now-released Flink 1.9 with
the new UI?
What parallelism is needed to reproduce the issue?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:59 PM Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> I remember an issue regarding the watermark fetch request from the WebUI
> exceeding some HTTP si
I remember an issue regarding the watermark fetch request from the WebUI
exceeding some HTTP size limit, since it tries to fetch all watermarks
at once, and the format of this request isn't exactly efficient.
Querying metrics for individual operators still works since the request
is small enou
Hi,
Thomas, thanks for confirming this. I have noticed, that in 1.9 the
WebUI has been reworked a lot, does anyone know if this is still an
issue? I currently cannot easily try 1.9, so I cannot confirm or
disprove that.
Jan
On 8/14/19 6:25 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
I have also noticed this i
I have also noticed this issue (Flink 1.5, Flink 1.8), and it appears with
higher parallelism.
This can be confusing to the user when watermarks actually work and can be
observed using the metrics.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 7:36 AM Jan Lukavský wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible, that watermarks are
