Re: Breaking changes in Flume - 2.0 release

Agreed. Another change we might want to consider is shading the dependencies of individual modules and the framework itself. This will make it easier to upgrade individual modules. On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > I think this change is important enough to

Re: Breaking changes in Flume - 2.0 release

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Hari Shreedharan wrote: > Agreed. Another change we might want to consider is shading the > dependencies of individual modules and the framework itself. This will make > it easier to upgrade individual modules. > +1, I don't know to

RE: Merging to trunk?

Hi Mike, I gave it a try and changed the Solr version to 7.2.1. It all compiled well. Only the tests were failing, because SolrServer, which is needed in the test cases to connect to the embedded Test Server is no longer available in org.apache.solr.client.solrj. But that's not needed in the