I've got a pretty well resourced pre-production environment that might do the
trick quite nicely.
-- Chris Horrocks
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:55 pm, Lior Zeno <'liorz...@gmail.com'> wrote:
I think that we can come up with an initial version with little efforts.
The simplest scenario I can
You may want to take a look at
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Performance+Measurements+
-+round+2
and the older..
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Flume+NG+Performance+Meas
urements
when coming up with a list of configurations to benchmark.
-roshan
I have just proposed enabling Travis on a different thread. That should
help with this. (Having a separate machine would be best, but I don't know
how we could get one. I'll do the homework for this.)
On Oct 13, 2016 5:57 PM, "Lior Zeno" wrote:
> Maybe getting an isolated
Maybe getting an isolated environment? The CI environment might be shared
among multiple users, adding too much noise to the performance test.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Balazs Donat Bessenyei wrote:
> +1
>
> I think this is a good idea!
>
> How can I help with
I think that we can come up with an initial version with little efforts.
The simplest scenario I can think of is running a Flume instance (with a
SeqGen source and a Null sink) for one minute, and then report the average
events per second.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Attila Simon
+1
I think this is a good idea!
How can I help with setting it up?
On Oct 13, 2016 5:20 PM, "Lior Zeno" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Monitoring Flume's performance over time is an important step in every
> production-level application. Benchmarking Flume on a nightly basis has
>
Good idea! What would be required to set up something similar for Flume?
ie initial time cost for setting up the infrastructure and periodic time
cost to add new use-cases.
Cheers,
Attila
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Lior Zeno wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Monitoring Flume's