Re: FreeMarker 3 wiki page - please review it

2017-06-12 Thread Daniel Dekany
Monday, June 12, 2017, 6:35:57 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > That's fantastic Daniel, it's great to see the whole summary in one place. > > > > One thought is that it might be helpful to split the items under 'API and > architecture' and 'Template language' into those intended for a first

Re: FreeMarker 3 wiki page - please review it

2017-06-12 Thread David E Jones
That's fantastic Daniel, it's great to see the whole summary in one place. One thought is that it might be helpful to split the items under 'API and architecture' and 'Template language' into those intended for a first release and those that are 'nice to haves' that may come later. My

[DRAFT] What the new Status Pages potentially look like

2017-06-12 Thread John D. Ament
All, We're piloting a new format for the podling status pages. Specifically, the current status page leaves a lot to be desired - it's basically crafted html, there's no structure and its hard to find missing items. The end goal is to have a web form editable in Whimsy, but until we get more

FreeMarker 3 wiki page - please review it

2017-06-12 Thread Daniel Dekany
I have made a page about what FreeMarker 3 is about and how it should look, because all this was only extractable from mailing list discussions so far. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/FreeMarker+3 Something you are missing from it, or disagree with it? Eventually we should

Re: FreeMarker 3 wiki page - please review it

2017-06-12 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Very cool. This document explains the purpose of FM3 and puts things into perspective. I learned something new so thank you for sharing. The only thing that I can suggest is to group together the intended backwards breaking changes under a header to distinguish it from improvements. On Jun 12,