Re: Abandoning Servlet 2.3 support?

requires Java 5, hence if > we want 2.3.24 to be part of a 3.x maintenance release, it can't > require any higher.) > > > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 5:23:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Frankly, I would have dropped support for servlet 2.3 a while ago. >> Same for Jav

Re: Abandoning Servlet 2.3 support?

Frankly, I would have dropped support for servlet 2.3 a while ago. Same for Java 5. Heck Log4j just made the minimum version Java 7. Ralph > On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > We will need to call some Servlet 2.4 API-s, and I can solve it >

Re: Graduation issues

If the graduation vote fails the project would be told why. They would continue in the incubator if they choose until whatever issues there were are addressed. PPMC members usually continue on as PMC members although mentors frequently don’t stay on. Ralph > On Jun 18, 2016, at 7:01 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating

Actually, you can deploy SNAPSHOTs from a Jenkins job every day if you want to. They aren’t releases. I believe the only purpose that section serves is to let you verify that your settings are correct and that you have permission to deploy to the repository. Note that what you are deploying to

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

I am also +1 on the release Ralph > On Jan 16, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Those also look fine to me. The artifacts has the new NOTICE files, > and the the sha1 and md5 checksums are correct. > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Saturday, January 16,

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation

This project is not in any danger of being “retired”. Ralph > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Tuesday, July 26, 2016, 6:43:46 PM, Pete Helgren wrote: > >> I lurk as well but use Freemarker pretty much every day in a fairly >> narrowly defined way.

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation

To answer this question, FreeMarker primarily has a single developer who does most everything when he can. The whole point of becoming a project at Apache was to try to change that. Normally committers are only nominated and elected after they contribute for a while - see

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

>> >> >> >> 2017-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org>: >> >>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again >>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also >>> to t

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

not > try.freemarker.apache.org which is quite recent. Hence maybe some caution > needed... > > My 2 cts > > Jacques > > > Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit : >> Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as >> try.freemarker.o

Re: Home page content changes - please review

It looks like you only fixed one of them. Ralph > On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks, fixed. > > > Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Aggreement s/b Agreement. >> >>

Re: Home page content changes - please review

y haven't seen it... it's > certainly better than nothing. > > Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer >> knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to >> be Apac

Re: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

You would probably be better served by having someone else volunteer to be PMC chair. My reasoning for that is exactly for the same reason you put yourself there. You are the most active committer and obviously aren’t going anywhere. Having someone else be chair insures that someone else is

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

, "Daniel Dekany" <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > > Monday, January 8, 2018, 6:30:33 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> You would probably be better served by having someone else >> volunteer to be PMC chair. My reasoning for that is exactly for the >> same re

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

+1 binding Ralph > On Jan 13, 2018, at 2:31 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Dear FreeMarker Community Members, > > Following the discussion on this list > (dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org) on graduating the Apache > FreeMarker Project from Incubation to a Top Level

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

I am confused. Who are we waiting for to do what? Ralph > On Feb 3, 2018, at 4:39 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Good! (And sounds like communication is lacking on the other side...) > Now you aren't red on > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker#reporting. > >

Re: Moving JBoss FreeMarker IDE (Eclipse plugin) to the ASF?

If RedHat took ownership of the tool then they should be able to take care of changing the license and sending an SGA to the ASF. However, nothing in your email indicates that RedHat has any interest in donating the tool to the ASF. Short of that your only real option is to fork it to GitHub.

Re: FreeMarker has graduated to TLP!

Congrats! Ralph > On Mar 23, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Lalish-Menagh, Trevor > wrote: > > How exciting! Congrats to all the dedicated volunteers that made this a > reality! > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: >>

Re: Started graduation resolution DISCUSS on general@incubator.a.o

You can prepare the release in advance if you want. You just cannot make it public until after the board gives approval. Ralph > On Feb 26, 2018, at 2:09 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Thanks Jacopo! > > If the board will accept the resolution on 21st of March, we can at >