Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Ralph Goers 
It looks like you only fixed one of them.

Ralph

> On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> 
> Thanks, fixed.
> 
> 
> Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> 
>> Aggreement s/b Agreement.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
>>> 
>>> Regarding pull request on Github
>>> 
>>> By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
>>> sufficient rights to use and release the submitted work under the
>>> Apache license. You grant the same rights (copyright license, patent
>>> license, etc.) to the Apache Software Foundation as if you have
>>> signed a Contributor License Aggreement. For contributions that are
>>> judged to be non-trivial, you will be asked to actually signing a
>>> Contributor License Aggreement.
>>> 
>>> Though it's not shown in a popup with a checkbox before someone makes
>>> a pull request, so anybody can say that they haven't seen it... it's
>>> certainly better than nothing.
>>> 
>>> Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> 
 An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer
 knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to
 be Apache licensed. Simply having a statement in the main README at
 GitHub with a statement to the effect that all contributions
 submitted as pull requests are under the Apache license would be enough.
 
 Ralph 
 
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> 
> Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
> merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
> https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request
> 
> Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
> answer.
> 
> 
> Also, the left side menu has changed (like here:
> https://freemarker.apache.org/ ), as I have removed the
> "Miscellaneous" category, and added the "Foundation" category. The
> last is to make certain ASF related matters more accessible. The items
> that were under "Miscellaneous":
> - sf.net project link was removed (nobody should use that anymore)
> - "Source code" was moved to Community (doesn't fit elsewhere...)
> - "Project history" was moved under "Foundation"
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
> 
> 
 
 
 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
> 
>

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Daniel Dekany 
Thanks, fixed.


Monday, November 13, 2017, 5:13:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> Aggreement s/b Agreement.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
>> 
>> I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
>> 
>>  Regarding pull request on Github
>> 
>>  By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
>>  sufficient rights to use and release the submitted work under the
>>  Apache license. You grant the same rights (copyright license, patent
>>  license, etc.) to the Apache Software Foundation as if you have
>>  signed a Contributor License Aggreement. For contributions that are
>>  judged to be non-trivial, you will be asked to actually signing a
>>  Contributor License Aggreement.
>> 
>> Though it's not shown in a popup with a checkbox before someone makes
>> a pull request, so anybody can say that they haven't seen it... it's
>> certainly better than nothing.
>> 
>> Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> 
>>> An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer
>>> knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to
>>> be Apache licensed. Simply having a statement in the main README at
>>> GitHub with a statement to the effect that all contributions
>>> submitted as pull requests are under the Apache license would be enough.
>>> 
>>> Ralph 
>>> 
 On Nov 11, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
 
 Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
 merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
 https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request
 
 Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
 answer.
 
 
 Also, the left side menu has changed (like here:
 https://freemarker.apache.org/ ), as I have removed the
 "Miscellaneous" category, and added the "Foundation" category. The
 last is to make certain ASF related matters more accessible. The items
 that were under "Miscellaneous":
 - sf.net project link was removed (nobody should use that anymore)
 - "Source code" was moved to Community (doesn't fit elsewhere...)
 - "Project history" was moved under "Foundation"
 
 -- 
 Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>> 
>> 
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Ralph Goers 
Aggreement s/b Agreement.

Ralph


> On Nov 13, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> 
> I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/
> 
>  Regarding pull request on Github
> 
>  By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
>  sufficient rights to use and release the submitted work under the
>  Apache license. You grant the same rights (copyright license, patent
>  license, etc.) to the Apache Software Foundation as if you have
>  signed a Contributor License Aggreement. For contributions that are
>  judged to be non-trivial, you will be asked to actually signing a
>  Contributor License Aggreement.
> 
> Though it's not shown in a popup with a checkbox before someone makes
> a pull request, so anybody can say that they haven't seen it... it's
> certainly better than nothing.
> 
> Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> 
>> An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer
>> knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to
>> be Apache licensed. Simply having a statement in the main README at
>> GitHub with a statement to the effect that all contributions
>> submitted as pull requests are under the Apache license would be enough.
>> 
>> Ralph 
>> 
>>> On Nov 11, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
>>> merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
>>> https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request
>>> 
>>> Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
>>> answer.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Also, the left side menu has changed (like here:
>>> https://freemarker.apache.org/ ), as I have removed the
>>> "Miscellaneous" category, and added the "Foundation" category. The
>>> last is to make certain ASF related matters more accessible. The items
>>> that were under "Miscellaneous":
>>> - sf.net project link was removed (nobody should use that anymore)
>>> - "Source code" was moved to Community (doesn't fit elsewhere...)
>>> - "Project history" was moved under "Foundation"
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
> 
>

Re: Home page content changes - please review

2017-11-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux 

Sounds fair and enough to me

Jacques


Le 13/11/2017 à 09:55, Daniel Dekany a écrit :

I have added a such statement to the README.md now:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/

   Regarding pull request on Github

   By sending a pull request you grant the Apache Software Foundation
   sufficient rights to use and release the submitted work under the
   Apache license. You grant the same rights (copyright license, patent
   license, etc.) to the Apache Software Foundation as if you have
   signed a Contributor License Aggreement. For contributions that are
   judged to be non-trivial, you will be asked to actually signing a
   Contributor License Aggreement.

Though it's not shown in a popup with a checkbox before someone makes
a pull request, so anybody can say that they haven't seen it... it's
certainly better than nothing.

Monday, November 13, 2017, 12:36:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:


An ICLA is always encouraged but is not required if the committer
knows for certain the contributor intends for their contribution to
be Apache licensed. Simply having a statement in the main README at
GitHub with a statement to the effect that all contributions
submitted as pull requests are under the Apache license would be enough.

Ralph


On Nov 11, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:

Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request

Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
answer.


Also, the left side menu has changed (like here:
https://freemarker.apache.org/ ), as I have removed the
"Miscellaneous" category, and added the "Foundation" category. The
last is to make certain ASF related matters more accessible. The items
that were under "Miscellaneous":
- sf.net project link was removed (nobody should use that anymore)
- "Source code" was moved to Community (doesn't fit elsewhere...)
- "Project history" was moved under "Foundation"

--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany