Support seems to be unanimously good, and folks voted in this thread. I'm
going to make the ASF-INFRA request.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:47 AM Anthony Baker wrote:
> Barry and I tossed up a draft PR to fix a problem in session state
> replication with Tomcat. If we can get this completed I’d
Barry and I tossed up a draft PR to fix a problem in session state replication
with Tomcat. If we can get this completed I’d like to include it with v1.13.0.
I believe our tests will fail with any version of Tomcat after 9.0.21.
Anthony
> On May 15, 2020, at 1:27 AM, Ju@N wrote:
>
> +1
>
Please refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20270
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Robert Houghton
wrote:
> Support seems to be unanimously good, and folks voted in this thread. I'm
> going to make the ASF-INFRA request.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:47 AM Anthony Baker wrote:
Is there a link to the PR in question? I don't see anything on GitHub.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:23 PM Anthony Baker wrote:
> Whoops, this got stuck on the wrong thread. Resending.
>
> We’re continuing to investigate some compatibility issues; there may be
> further changes needed.
>
>
>
Whoops, this got stuck on the wrong thread. Resending.
We’re continuing to investigate some compatibility issues; there may be further
changes needed.
Anthony
> On May 15, 2020, at 11:46 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> Barry and I tossed up a draft PR to fix a problem in session state
>
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5110
Sorry, I’m bad at emailing today.
On May 15, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Donal Evans
mailto:doev...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
Is there a link to the PR in question? I don't see anything on GitHub.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:23 PM Anthony Baker
I'm also bad at using my eyes, apparently. The PR was right there in the
list of open ones. I don't know how I missed it.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:59 PM Anthony Baker wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5110
>
> Sorry, I’m bad at emailing today.
>
> On May 15, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Donal
+1
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:19, Mark Hanson wrote:
> +1. The more we can automate this types of checks the better.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
--
Ju@N
