JIRA permissions

2017-08-02 Thread Brian Rowe
Hello all, I'm having some trouble assigning tickets to myself and closing them in JIRA. Can someone grant me the appropriate permissions. My username is: WireBaron Thanks, -Brian

Re: Review Request 61411: GEODE-3286 Failing to cleanup connections from ConnectionTable receiver table (corrected "stopped" check in previous fix)

2017-08-03 Thread Brian Rowe
ternal/tcp/ConnectionTableTest.java Line 54 (original), 70 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61411/#comment258000> Add a when(connection.isReceiverStopped()).thenReturn(false); - Brian Rowe On Aug. 3, 2017, 6:59 p.m., Hitesh Kh

Re: Review Request 61420: GEODE-3307 CI failure: Uncaught exception in thread Thread[Geode Membership View Creator

2017-08-03 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61420/#review182179 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On Aug. 3, 2017, 10:07 p.m

Re: Review Request 61540: GEODE-3403: Modify rolling upgrade test configuration for 1.2.x release

2017-08-10 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61540/#review182617 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On Aug. 9, 2017, 8:45 p.m

Re: Review Request 60856: GEODE-3052 Need to reset isCoordinator flag in GMSLocator.

2017-07-13 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60856/#review180500 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On July 13, 2017, 11:28 p.m

Can someone grant me wiki edit privileges

2017-07-17 Thread Brian Rowe
Can someone with the relevant karma please grant me edit permissions on cwiki.apache.org/confluence. My username there is browe. Thanks, -Brian

Re: Review Request 60451: GEODE-2996: adding Put handler

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
t; > > This has nothing to do with the ProtobufOpsProcessor. Maybe the builder > > can be passed in. > > Brian Rowe wrote: > Hmm, I'm not sure I agree. The ProtobufOpsProcessor has to generate the > ClientProtocol.Response containing the response from the operation ha

Re: Review Request 60486: GEODE-3105: Adding handler for GetRegions

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
`ErrorMessage`, that would contain the `exceptionCode` > > and `errorMessage`. This has been removed. - Brian --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60486/#r

Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
test covering new operations Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60526: GEODE-3121: Verify SSL works with new protobuf protocol

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
/3/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60526/diff/2-3/ Testing --- This change is just adding a test. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60526: GEODE-3121: Verify SSL works with new protobuf protocol

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
ps://reviews.apache.org/r/60526/#review179943 ------- On July 7, 2017, 10:16 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail.

Re: Review Request 60526: GEODE-3121: Verify SSL works with new protobuf protocol

2017-07-07 Thread Brian Rowe
/resources/org/apache/geode/protocol/default.keystore PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60526/diff/2/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60526/diff/1-2/ Testing --- This change is just adding a test. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-11 Thread Brian Rowe
e=1771594#file1771594line48> > > > > Empty putAll does nothing. I don't believe we should log an error. Fixed. - Brian --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org

Re: Review Request 60629: GEODE-3129 - Added error messages to protobuf protocol

2017-07-06 Thread Brian Rowe
t; > geode-protobuf/src/main/proto/region_API.proto > > Line 102 (original), 109 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60629/diff/1/?file=1768757#file1768757line109> > > > > As raised earlier, how about `GetAvailableRegions`? See my response to that com

Review Request 60834: GEODE-3051: Remove unreachable exception handling in AcceptorImpl.accept

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
0718/diff/1/?file=1771596#file1771596line141> > > > > could we possibly use `addAllFailedKeys(java.lang.Iterable > org.apache.geode.protocol.protobuf.BasicTypes.EncodedValue> values)` This got removed with the failed keys field. - Brian --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. T

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/3/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/2-3/ Testing --- Added unit tests for new operation handlers Added integration test covering new operations Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/4/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/3-4/ Testing --- Added unit tests for new operation handlers Added integration test covering new operations Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/2/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/1-2/ Testing --- Added unit tests for new operation handlers Added integration test covering new operations Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
gt; > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Brian Rowe <br...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> >> >> > On July 7, 2017, 11:51 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: >> > > geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/proto >> buf/operations/PutAllRequestOperationH

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
eviews.apache.org/r/60718/#review180212 --- On July 12, 2017, 6:27 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/ > ---

Re: Review Request 60718: GEODE-2997: New flow getAll/putAll

2017-07-12 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/#review180349 --- On July 12, 2017, 6:27 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > >

Re: Review Request 60523: GEODE-3141 New flow: GetRegion

2017-06-28 Thread Brian Rowe
improvement). - Brian Rowe On June 28, 2017, 11:06 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://re

Review Request 60526: GEODE-3121: Verify SSL works with new protobuf protocol

2017-06-28 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This change is just adding a test. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60451: GEODE-2996: adding Put handler

2017-06-28 Thread Brian Rowe
ine46> > > > > This is too specific... What about all the other encoding types? > > Int,long,short,byte? We discussed templatizing this to make it more generally useful, but decided that since this is a test utility it wasn't really worth making

Re: Review Request 60550: GEODE-3154: add geode-protobuf to expected_jars.txt

2017-06-30 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60550/#review179374 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On June 29, 2017, 9:39 p.m

Review Request 60629: GEODE-3129 - Added error messages to protobuf protocol

2017-07-03 Thread Brian Rowe
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60629/diff/1/ Testing --- Protobuf tests impacted by these changes have been refactored to check for error responses. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60312: GEODE-2804 Cache InetAddress if configure host as ip string.

2017-06-27 Thread Brian Rowe
mment253397> Typo, s/loators/locators geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/PoolFactoryImpl.java Lines 308 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60312/#comment253399> remove this - Brian Rowe On June

Re: Review Request 60629: GEODE-3129 - Added error messages to protobuf protocol

2017-07-06 Thread Brian Rowe
- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60629/#review179796 --- On July 3, 2017, 11:40 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > > --

Geode Module Configuration

2017-08-09 Thread Brian Rowe
-lucene, there is some per-region configuration that gets added to cache.xml files. Is there any global configuration? Thanks, Brian Rowe and Galen O'Sullivan

Re: Review Request 61672: GEODE-3249: internal messages should require credentials

2017-08-16 Thread Brian Rowe
nes 62 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61672/#comment259091> Does this call do anything? serverConnection is a mock and you haven't told it how to handle this call. - Brian Rowe On Aug. 15, 2017, 8:46 p.m., Bruce Schu

Re: Review Request 60217: GEODE-2995: adding in protocol handler for protobuf messages

2017-06-20 Thread Brian Rowe
inal), 39 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60217/#comment252354> Alright, I'll leave that for that batch of work then - Brian Rowe On June 20, 2017, 12:17 a.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > > --- &g

Re: Review Request 60217: GEODE-2995: adding in protocol handler for protobuf messages

2017-06-20 Thread Brian Rowe
--- Precheckin in progress. Unit tests added for all new classes, integration test added for entire module. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Review Request 60217: GEODE-2995: adding in protocol handler for protobuf messages

2017-06-19 Thread Brian Rowe
/CodecRegistryJUnitTest.java PRE-CREATION gradle/rat.gradle 1bea5843b settings.gradle c0fdb6e4f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60217/diff/1/ Testing --- Precheckin in progress. Unit tests added for all new classes, integration test added for entire module. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 60217: GEODE-2995: adding in protocol handler for protobuf messages

2017-06-21 Thread Brian Rowe
for entire module. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Review Request 60442: GEODE-3130: Refactoring AcceptorImpl communication mode switch

2017-06-26 Thread Brian Rowe
in progress. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Review Request 60451: GEODE-2996: adding Put handler

2017-06-26 Thread Brian Rowe
test, precheckin in progress. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 59863: Removing obsolete SSL handling in `AcceptorImpl.accept` catch block

2017-06-07 Thread Brian Rowe
) - geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/AcceptorImpl.java 9658f98da Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59863/diff/2/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59863/diff/1-2/ Testing --- Precheckin started Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 59894: GEODE-3041 CI failure: DistributedMemberDUnitTest.testGroupsInAllVMs fails intermittently

2017-06-08 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59894/#review177374 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On June 7, 2017, 9:56 p.m

Re: Review Request 59925: GEODE-3052 Restarting 2 locators within 1s of each other causes potential locator split brain

2017-06-08 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59925/#review177371 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On June 8, 2017, 6:36 p.m

Re: Review Request 59896: GEODE-3043 surprise member added when the member is already in the cluster

2017-06-08 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59896/#review177375 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On June 7, 2017, 10:02 p.m

Review Request 59863: Removing obsolete SSL handling in `AcceptorImpl.accept` catch block

2017-06-06 Thread Brian Rowe
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59863/diff/1/ Testing --- Precheckin started Thanks, Brian Rowe

Review Request 60486: GEODE-3105: Adding handler for GetRegions

2017-06-27 Thread Brian Rowe
://reviews.apache.org/r/60486/diff/1/ Testing --- Added unit test verifying hanlder behavior. Added integration test verifying module correctness for getRegion. Running precheckin. Thanks, Brian Rowe

Re: Review Request 61816: GEODE-3409 Protobuf Client Can't Connect Once Connection Limit Has Been Reached, Even After Connections Closed

2017-08-23 Thread Brian Rowe
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61816/#review183617 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Rowe On Aug. 23, 2017, 3:47 p.m

Re: proposing reduced default for "membership-port-range"

2018-10-11 Thread Brian Rowe
I agree that we should have defaulted everything to using ephemeral ports and forced clients to explicitly assign ports and membership ranges if needed (any of the reasons Anthony mentioned above). However, I don't think we can change the default assigned ports at this point, unless we want to

Re: proposing reduced default for "membership-port-range"

2018-10-11 Thread Brian Rowe
rts before selecting ephemeral > ports? I think this would resolve the collision issue described above. > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:58 AM Brian Rowe wrote: > > > I agree that we should have defaulted everything to using ephemeral ports > > and forced clients to explicitly

Re: proposing reduced default for "membership-port-range"

2018-10-11 Thread Brian Rowe
e base? It seems like having a common > implementation of this would make it a lot easier to solve this type of > problem in the future. > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:27 AM Brian Rowe wrote: > > > Galen, this was actually my first instinct. Unfortunately this range is >

proposing reduced default for "membership-port-range"

2018-10-04 Thread Brian Rowe
Currently the default value for this parameter covers the default locator and server port values. As a result of this, when launching a locator and then a server on the same system using gfsh, it's possible to see the server fail because the locator has already bound the default server socket.

Geode 1.8.0 maven repository is missing sources and javadoc jars

2018-12-20 Thread Brian Rowe
The maven repository for 1.8.0 seems to be missing the 1.8.0 source jars. This means people using an IDE can't download these jars automatically to see the geode source in their IDE. Specifically, we see the following in 1.8 vs 1.7: