Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Final SD[G] Moore-RELEASE/2.2 GA is (tentatively) scheduled for Thurs, Sept 19th. Even still, any SD[G] Moore service release post GA (e.g. 2.2.1, 2.2.2, ..., 2.2.N) can pick up any patch release of Apache Geode 1.9.x (e.g. 1.9.1, 1.9.2, ..., 1.9.N). Additionally, SBDG 1.2 cannot go GA before

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

We submitted a PR against release/1.9.1 to remove 1.9.1 from Version: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3989 Please review. After we merge this in, we'll create RC2 and start a vote for it. Thanks, Kirk and Owen On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > Anyone want to help me

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Anyone want to help me revert these Version changes and make an RC2? I'm not sure how to do this correctly. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:48 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > Deadline for voting is Sept 5th. However, we have two -1 votes so RC1 is > dead. > > @John I'm not sure we can make the deadline for SB2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Deadline for voting is Sept 5th. However, we have two -1 votes so RC1 is dead. @John I'm not sure we can make the deadline for SB2 now? Is it still worth trying to create RC2 for SB? On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:34 PM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > -1 we should revert the 1.9.1 Version.java change on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

-1 we should revert the 1.9.1 Version.java change on this branch and on develop On 8/29/19 9:02 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release!

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

I'm going to vote -1 until we get the Version.java issue figured out. It is sounding like we will need to revert the changes and create a new RC unless we come to an agreement that bumping the version for 1.9.1 is the right way to go. -Dan On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:47 AM Jens Deppe wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

FWIW, I don't think 1.9.1 clients (or any combination of patch versions) should be incompatible with servers 1.9.patch-1 (e.g. 1.9.0). IMO, that would be very bad! major.minor client/servers, regardless of patch versions, should remain interoperable. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:41 AM Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:39 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > What's the deadline this time? Can't be Aug 27... > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

1.9.1 was added to 1.10 and develop as well, so will need to be reverted everywhere and will not be able to do the 1.10.0 RC1 today > On Aug 29, 2019, at 11:35 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > From my reading, bumping the ordinal in 1.9.1 will make 1.9.1 incompatible > with 1.10, unless we also fix

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

>From my reading, bumping the ordinal in 1.9.1 will make 1.9.1 incompatible with 1.10, unless we also fix 1.10 to know about 1.9.1's ordinal. It will also make 1.9.1 clients incompatible with 1.9.0 servers, which may not be desired? I guess we just need to settle on a process. It sounds like

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

What's the deadline this time? Can't be Aug 27... On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > >> +1 (just in case my vote counts) > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

I see there’s a VOTE thread for 1.9.1. Do you suggest to -1 that release candidate? Anthony > On Aug 29, 2019, at 8:53 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > I also missed this vote email. Dan is right that creating the v1.9.1 Version > instance was unnecessary. I don't think it hurts

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: +1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: +1 (just in case my vote counts) On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. Thanks to all the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 (just in case my vote counts) > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > Hello Geode dev community, > > > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. > > Thanks to all the community members for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

Bruce, could you also update the release instructions to clarify when the serialization version should and should not be bumped? The existing instructions say always bump on every release. There is a separate thread

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 (just in case my vote counts) On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > Hello Geode dev community, > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this > release! > > Please do a review and give

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

I also missed this vote email.  Dan is right that creating the v1.9.1 Version instance was unnecessary.  I don't think it hurts anything per se but it does unnecessarily consume a serialization version ordinal.  That will leave us with only 3 (102, 103 and 104) if we *ever* need to issue more

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:37 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, John Blum wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:51 PM Dan Smith wrote: > > > >> I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. > I > >> don't really have much context on why

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, John Blum wrote: +1 On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:51 PM Dan Smith wrote: I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. I don't really have much context on why we want a 1.9.1 but I'm happy to double check the bits. One comment on this RC - I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:51 PM Dan Smith wrote: > I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. I > don't really have much context on why we want a 1.9.1 but I'm happy to > double check the bits. > > One comment on this RC - I noticed that we bumped the ordinal in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. I don't really have much context on why we want a 1.9.1 but I'm happy to double check the bits. One comment on this RC - I noticed that we bumped the ordinal in Version.java - is that what we actually want to do? That implies

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 for a re-vote On 8/28/19 2:42 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: SBDG 1.2 is currently in RC and cannot be changed to depend on Geode 1.10. It must depend on Geode 1.9 or 1.9.1. So if we want to provide the logging fixes for SBDG 1.2 then we must release Geode 1.9.1. Let's open a new vote for releasing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

SBDG 1.2 is currently in RC and cannot be changed to depend on Geode 1.10. It must depend on Geode 1.9 or 1.9.1. So if we want to provide the logging fixes for SBDG 1.2 then we must release Geode 1.9.1. Let's open a new vote for releasing Geode 1.9.1. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:37 PM Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

It's past the announced deadline and the vote has failed to due to lack of quorum. Voting status == +1: zero votes +0: zero votes -0: zero votes -1: zero votes The voting does not meet the requirements of at least 3 PMC members with