Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-05-05 Thread Mark Bretl
Thanks Sai. Since we have our board report this month, I will note it in there as a blocker to see if we can gain traction. --Mark On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 6:42 PM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > Mark, > > There isn't any specific ticket I created for larger VMs. I heard there is > an initiative within

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-05-04 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
Mark, There isn't any specific ticket I created for larger VMs. I heard there is an initiative within the infra team to sponsor bigger VMs than the free tier we use for Github actions, so we have to wait until that initiative picks up steam. On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 13:58, Mark Bretl wrote: >

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-05-04 Thread Mark Bretl
Sai, Do you have an INFRA Jira ticket? --Mark On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:53 AM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > There is no ETA provided. > > Sai > > On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 14:47, Kirk Lund wrote: > > > Did INFRA give any hint as to when they might provide the bigger VMs? > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-05-02 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
There is no ETA provided. Sai On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 14:47, Kirk Lund wrote: > Did INFRA give any hint as to when they might provide the bigger VMs? > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:24 PM Sai Boorlagadda > > wrote: > > > I went ahead and merged github workflow jobs that tests > > WAN, CQ,

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-04-29 Thread Kirk Lund
Did INFRA give any hint as to when they might provide the bigger VMs? On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:24 PM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > I went ahead and merged github workflow jobs that tests > WAN, CQ, Assembly and Managment distributed tests. > > Free workers VMs has 2 cores and tuning any sort of >

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-04-17 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
I went ahead and merged github workflow jobs that tests WAN, CQ, Assembly and Managment distributed tests. Free workers VMs has 2 cores and tuning any sort of parameters isn't speeding up geode-core DUnits. Talking to infra team found that infra is working on providing self-hosted (sponsored by

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-04-13 Thread Kirk Lund
I see that there is at least one person concerned about DUnit tests requiring longer timeouts. This is the current situation with an unknown number of the DUnit tests. One possibility is to move the worst offenders to a new src set within geode-core and then give that its own job with a larger

Re: Update on DUnit test pipeline on Github actions

2023-04-13 Thread Kirk Lund
Is the coreDistributedTests the only dunit job that currently takes too long? If it is we may want to split that into more than one job. -Kirk On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:58 PM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > All, > > There is an upper bound for job execution time on free workers (set to 6 > hours