-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52796/#review152387
-----------------------------------------------------------



Based on feedback from Naba, I'll rework this to just wrap the result collector 
in a synchronized result collector, to avoid places where we might be accessing 
this thing without synchronization.

- Dan Smith


On Oct. 12, 2016, 6:12 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52796/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 12, 2016, 6:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Barry Oglesby and nabarun nag.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When executing a function from a client, we can be adding results to the
> result collector from multiple threads. One code path was already
> synchronizing on the collector when adding results. However, if the
> function returned an exception we were not synchronizing.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/ExecuteFunctionOp.java
>  6597b680227fb47492dc973baecffd504d6cdf68 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/ExecuteRegionFunctionOp.java
>  ae08ac0affdef7f2270f68da5622194be8fd009f 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/ExecuteRegionFunctionSingleHopOp.java
>  51ea8e4fbc64acbbd1165856a2dd09704d63e857 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52796/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run the test in this bug 500 times with and without this fix. Without the fix 
> it failed 11 times, which the fix it passed every time. Running precheckin on 
> these changes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan Smith
> 
>

Reply via email to