I just see an empty page.
Matt Hogstrom schrieb:
Just a quick heads up. I added a page to help users get Geronimo into
Eclipse for development. The page isn't finished but thought I'd ask
for comments now. The link is at
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/EclipseDeployment
There are some
Hello,
from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00
(obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) .
So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the
others? From the dev mailing list, I'd guess Geronimo is almost
complete, so what
I appear to be getting empty pages for the entire wiki right now.
Rick
On 6/6/05, Peter Nabbefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just see an empty page.
Matt Hogstrom schrieb:
Just a quick heads up. I added a page to help users get Geronimo into
Eclipse for development. The page isn't
It is working for me (client is Firefox on Windows)
--
Jeremy
Rick McGuire wrote:
I appear to be getting empty pages for the entire wiki right now.
Rick
On 6/6/05, Peter Nabbefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just see an empty page.
Matt Hogstrom schrieb:
Just a quick heads up. I added
It's still failing for me on any Wiki page. I've tried with both
Firefox and IE. If I view source, this is all I'm receiving:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252/HEAD
BODY/BODY/HTML
On 6/6/05,
Taking just the JSR-88 bit, the plugin functionality that deals with
distribution is complete - our deployer itself uses it to distribute,
start, stop, etc. applications.
The configuration part of the API is not implemented (strictly, we say
there are no configurable elements which IIRC is
Rick McGuire wrote:
It's still failing for me on any Wiki page. I've tried with both
Firefox and IE. If I view source, this is all I'm receiving:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252/HEAD
Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Hello,
from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00
(obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) .
So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the
others? From the dev mailing list, I'd guess Geronimo is
do a refresh?
I just refreshed and lost it. Something's wacked.
geir
On Jun 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
It's still failing for me on any Wiki page. I've tried with both
Firefox and IE. If I view source, this is all I'm receiving:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
There are some problems w/ the wiki. People are randomly reporting
failures.
We're working on it. Back to regularly scheduled discussions...
geir
On Jun 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
It's still failing for me on any Wiki page. I've tried with both
Seems like it's back. There was some mention of mod_cache changes...
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There are some problems w/ the wiki. People are randomly reporting
failures.
We're working on it. Back to regularly scheduled discussions...
geir
On Jun 6, 2005,
JSR-88 support is not complete. Most of the opoerations should
work (such as deploy, undeploy, etc.). However, I don't believe the
configuration beans are complete or up to date.
Aaron
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Hello,
from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed
Jacek Laskowski schrieb:
Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Hello,
from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00
(obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) .
So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the
others? From the dev mailing list,
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, David Jencks wrote:
4. Come up with a reasonable solution to the desire to set ports, pool
sizes, etc when starting the server. To me this definitely does not
involve editing the contents of the original deployment plans or the
compiled configurations but some entirely
Matt,
I've been working my way through the eclipse directions, and I've hit a
bit of a roadblock. I'm at the step where I need to remove the
hardcoded build path entries from the various *-builder projects.
Unfortunately, my version of eclipse 3.1 doesn't appear to have the
Configure Build
If you can, please vote for the following bugs in the Sun Java Bug
Database:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4957990
This is a nasty bug in the hotspot garbage collector that causes the
VM to hold on to classes and thus our class loaders.
I fixed most of the class loader memory leaks. There is still slow
leak in cglib which I think will be fixed quickly.
For anyone interested in the problem of garbage collecting class
loaders, I suggest a wonderful series of articles written by Attila
Szegedi (http://www.szegedi.org/).
We've been talking about new site content for a while, so I threw
together a quick, simple site that uses velocity and simple xml-based
documents for content.
An example of what it looks like now is here :
http://people.apache.org/~geirm/geronimo/
I put into the geronimo svn repo under
Looks OK to me, but Road Map is empty (which I guess you know),
coding standards are missing, and dependencies are woefully incomplete.
Also, I think Simone's name is spelled wrong, John Sisson is
listed twice, and I'd like to phrase the page as a committer list -- as it
may be
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looks OK to me, but Road Map is empty (which I guess you know),
coding standards are missing, and dependencies are woefully
incomplete.
yep, yep and yep. I was going to summarize our roadmap discussion
for that but didn't get to it.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:42 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looks OK to me, but Road Map is empty (which I guess you know),
coding standards are missing, and dependencies are woefully incomplete.
yep, yep and yep. I was going to summarize our
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:42 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looks OK to me, but Road Map is empty (which I guess you know),
coding standards are missing, and dependencies are woefully
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:54 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:42 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looks OK to me, but Road Map is empty (which I guess you know),
coding standards are
On Jun 6, 2005, at 10:03 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:54 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 6/6/2005 6:42 PM:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looks OK to me, but Road Map
I noticed all the page title names are prefaced with Velocity -. Is this
a residual effect from using Velocity and can it be controlled?
Brent
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We've been talking about new site content for a while, so I threw
On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:05 PM, Brent Worden wrote:
I noticed all the page title names are prefaced with Velocity -.
Is this
a residual effect from using Velocity and can it be controlled?
Doh! Fixed. Thanks
Brent
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
