Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread David Jencks
I'm afraid I think it's way too early to try to categorize where tests should go. Based on my experience so far I think we need to work on simplifying how to set up a small app and have some simple tests for it first. Once we have enough of these to confuse ourselves about organization,

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
I agree. We need some *real* tests first so that we can see if the setup we have no will work, or will not. Looks like it might need some more changes before we'd want to make a cookie cutter. --jason On Dec 8, 2006, at 12:35 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm afraid I think it's way too early

Re: svn commit: r483773 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ configs/webconsole-jetty6/ configs/webcons

2006-12-08 Thread Paul McMahan
Should the JSTL classes be made available in the web container instead of being included in the web apps? Looking at the spec that seems to be the case. Best wishes, Paul On 12/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jbohn Date: Thu Dec 7 17:53:34 2006 New Revision: 483773

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
too lazy to insert a :-) every 10 words... so... just assume that I have. :-P On Dec 7, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Since there were some questions today on where to drop new tests, I'll take a stab at creating a convention. Feel free to offer your suggestions so that we can

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2639) Upgrade dojo to 0.4.1

2006-12-08 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
Upgrade dojo to 0.4.1 - Key: GERONIMO-2639 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2639 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Task Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: console

Re: svn commit: r483773 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ configs/webconsole-jetty6/ configs/webcons

2006-12-08 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 8, 2006, at 12:48 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: Should the JSTL classes be made available in the web container instead of being included in the web apps? Looking at the spec that seems to be the case. If this is a spec jar then according to current convention it should be included in the

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2639) Upgrade dojo to 0.4.1

2006-12-08 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2639?page=all ] Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2639. -- Resolution: Fixed Upgrade dojo to 0.4.1 - Key: GERONIMO-2639 URL:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2637) Remove Peer transport setup from JMS portlet in 1.2

2006-12-08 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2637?page=all ] Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2637. -- Resolution: Fixed Remove Peer transport setup from JMS portlet in 1.2 --- Key:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1982) server try to deploy the modules in hot deployment directory again during server startup

2006-12-08 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1982?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1982. - Fix Version/s: 1.1.2 1.2 2.0-M1 (was: 2.0) Resolution: Fixed Fix for

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1982) server try to deploy the modules in hot deployment directory again during server startup

2006-12-08 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1982?page=comments#action_12456775 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1982: --- Make that GERONIMO-2584, the in my previous comment :o) server try to deploy the modules in

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2527) NullPointerException deploying app

2006-12-08 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2527?page=comments#action_12456783 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2527: --- May be deployer should provide an error message instead of printing the stackTrace.

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2456) NOTICE.txt is missing some notices added during 1.1.1 development

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2456?page=all ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-2456. -- Fix Version/s: 2.0-M1 Resolution: Fixed This has been fixed. NOTICE.txt is missing some notices added during 1.1.1 development

Re: svn commit: r483773 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ configs/webconsole-jetty6/ configs/webcons

2006-12-08 Thread Joe Bohn
Yes, Paul is correct. It's not a spec jar so I'll include it in the default environment for the builder as David recommends. Thanks, Joe David Jencks wrote: On Dec 8, 2006, at 12:48 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: Should the JSTL classes be made available in the web container instead of being

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 12/8/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance it might be useful to have a maven archetype to set up everything except the app to test and the actual test cases. thanks david jencks I have alrady written an archetype plugin called testsuite-archetype-plugin that will let

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 12/8/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: too lazy to insert a :-) every 10 words... so... just assume that I have. :-P On Dec 7, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Lastly, how do we deal with super apps like daytrader that can span across multiple testsuites ? I don't

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2640) Expose development and modificationTestInterval attributes in Jasper as configuration attributes for webcontainer

2006-12-08 Thread Sachin Patel (JIRA)
Expose development and modificationTestInterval attributes in Jasper as configuration attributes for webcontainer - Key: GERONIMO-2640 URL:

Broker

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
I am new to ActiveMQJMS.I have requirement where Requestor and Replier are residing on different JMS.If the broker is started is there any way from which i can find out which broker is running to get the connection from ActiveMQConnectionFactory. I need it to be as java code. Any help will be

JSP 2.1 with Jetty 6.0 and tomcat 6 distributions

2006-12-08 Thread Anitha Krishnasamy
Hi, I have deployed the Sample applications for JEE5 on both Jetty 6.0 and Tomcat 6 distributions. Servlets 2.5 application is working fine on both. But JSP 2.1 application throwing the following error. On Tomcat 6: --- org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /SampleJSP.jsp(12,35)

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2641) Missing license headers

2006-12-08 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
Missing license headers --- Key: GERONIMO-2641 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2641 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Reporter: Jarek Gawor

XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-min

2006-12-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Chris, This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional? Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: ccardona Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006 New Revision: 483346 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=483346 Log: GERONIMO-2633 : SVK synchronization patch for

Overwritting the request queue

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
I am creating the request queue in Requestor from Destination requestQueue = session.createQueue(requestQueueName); and sending the message to queue and then in replier i am again forming the request queue with same rquestqueuename Destination requestQueue =

Re: Broker

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
Solved!!! garima015 wrote: I am new to ActiveMQJMS.I have requirement where Requestor and Replier are residing on different JMS.If the broker is started is there any way from which i can find out which broker is running to get the connection from ActiveMQConnectionFactory. I need it to

Re: Overwritting the request queue

2006-12-08 Thread James Strachan
You might wanna surf some of the FAQ entries... http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-do-i-create-new-destinations.html On 12/8/06, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am creating the request queue in Requestor from Destination requestQueue = session.createQueue(requestQueueName); and

Re: Overwritting the request queue

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
I surfed a lot..but was not able to find out the resolution... Will be thankful if anybody can help James.Strachan wrote: You might wanna surf some of the FAQ entries... http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-do-i-create-new-destinations.html On 12/8/06, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: On 12/8/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance it might be useful to have a maven archetype to set up everything except the app to test and the actual test cases. thanks david jencks I have alrady written an archetype

Re: JSP 2.1 with Jetty 6.0 and tomcat 6 distributions

2006-12-08 Thread Paul McMahan
The jetty and tomcat JEE5 assemblies both use jasper for JSP so that explains why you're seeing the error in both places. Looking at org.apache.jaspler.compiler.Validator:705 I think I see where the error occurs: // JSP.2.2 - '#{' not allowed in template text if

Re: 1.2 Beta Tasks

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Question on the snapshots...what's the normal procedure for that in terms of releasing? For 1.2 we'll have OpenEJB 2.2 and 2.3 SNAPSHOTs or releases. (David Blevins, I'm diagnosing some issues in DayTrader) For other items do we take their code and create our own SNAPSHOT? Where does it

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
On Dec 8, 2006, at 3:50 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: too lazy to insert a :-) every 10 words... so... just assume that I have. :-P dude, you're killing me :-P Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.2 Beta Tasks

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Dec 8, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Question on the snapshots...what's the normal procedure for that in terms of releasing? IMO, it depends on the release. If it is a final production release, there should be no SNAPSHOTS. If it is a non-production release (alpha, beta or

Re: Help building Geronimo 1.2?

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
What JDK are you using? On Dec 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote: Ran into the following while trying to build from the 1.2 branch today... I'm a little new to this, so... any thoughts? I checked the target directory and the XmlUtilTest class appears to be there. Matt

Re: XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate

2006-12-08 Thread Christopher M. Cardona
Anita, This change was made in branches/1.2 and so trunk is being synched up. Best wishes, chris anita kulshreshtha wrote: Chris, This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional? Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: ccardona Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006

Re: XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate

2006-12-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
hmm... This change was only meant for the branch. I wonder what else was synched up.. Is there a way to say that a certain change is meant for a branch only, and should not be merged to the trunk? Thanks Anita --- Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anita, This change was

active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
I'm struggling with persistent option in activemq-cpp client. (my java client does the trick) part of my code looks like: producer-setDeliveryMode( DeliveryMode::PERSISTANT ); The problem is after I send a message, and stop the broker. The message is gone. If I send a lot of message exceeding

RE: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread Bish, Tim
AFAIK the activemq-cpp message do properly send the persistant flag. Can you create a small test app that demonstrates to problem? What are the steps you are currently following in both cases? Are you sending messages with the C++ client and they are not persistant when you restart and

Re: svn commit: r482713 - in /geronimo/specs: branches/1_1/geronimo-spec-j2ee-connector/src/main/java/javax/resource/ branches/1_1/geronimo-spec-j2ee-connector/src/test/java/javax/resource/ trunk/gero

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:33 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Kevan, After your Simpler suggestion, I did a little investigation and made it even Simpler :o) . Returning super.toString() in ResourceException.toString() has the same effect as eliminating the method altogether. I guess the

Re: CMP failures in 2.3 (was: Openjeb itests - 552 tests, 2 failures, 2 errors)

2006-12-08 Thread David Blevins
On Dec 7, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: On 07/12/2006, at 11:10 AM, David Blevins wrote: On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: We are now down to just 2 failures and 2 errors on the Openejb-2.3 itests. The stack trace is here -- http://rifers.org/paste/show/ 2622

Re: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
On 12/8/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AFAIK the activemq-cpp message do properly send the persistant flag. Can you create a small test app that demonstrates to problem? yes. my test code is just a copy of main.cpp from the example. run method looks like: virtual void run() {

RE: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread Bish, Tim
What version of the broker are you using? Regards Tim -Original Message- From: amq user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:37 PM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: active-cpp persistent problem On 12/8/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
ActiveMQ 4.0.2 and activemq-cpp-1.0 On 12/8/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What version of the broker are you using? Regards Tim -Original Message- From: amq user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:37 PM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2377) deploying a new datasource with the same name does not indicate any problem in the console

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2377?page=all ] Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-2377. Resolution: Fixed Applied to 1.2 and 2.0. Thanks for the patch Bill Dudney! deploying a new datasource with the same name does not indicate any

Re: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
I do see the message is NON-PERSISTENT from jconsole using browse(). No matter how I set it (persistent or non-persisten) in the cpp code. I got NON_PERSISTENT. Please help! On 12/8/06, amq user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ActiveMQ 4.0.2 and activemq-cpp-1.0 On 12/8/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: What is a super app anyways? :-P Maybe I should have called it a uber app. Unlike other small apps that we create and use to test a particular feature, DT can serve as the test app to test features across many categories. Small apps to test

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
On Dec 8, 2006, at 9:34 AM, David Jencks wrote: I was wondering why the SeleniumTestSupport and ExtendedSelenium classes were in the tests themselves rather than in a support jar. I'd think these would be used by just about all tests. They were simply never moved to a common location.

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: 1) just make a copy of test-deployment, (say call it cxf-deployment) 2) use it's child profile to go thro the complete maven lifecycle - compile, build and test your apps. 3) it's parent (deployment-testsuite) will take care of the server

Re: svn commit: r483773 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ configs/webconsole-jetty6/ configs/webcons

2006-12-08 Thread Joe Bohn
David, I need a little direction. I know that there is someplace/way to add a dependency for the default environment. Such a dependency is then added dynamically to the module that is being deployed. At least I think that is what I recall hearing you mention before. But I'm having

RE: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread Bish, Tim
I am investigating the problem, I will let you know when I figure it out, if you'd like, you can write an issue against activemq-cpp regarding this so you can track the progress there. Regards Tim -Original Message- From: amq user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08,

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2641) Missing license headers

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2641?page=all ] Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-2641: --- Fix Version/s: 1.2 2.0-M2 Affects Version/s: 1.2 2.0-M1 Priority: Blocker (was:

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 12/8/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: What is a super app anyways? :-P Maybe I should have called it a uber app. Unlike other small apps that we create and use to test a particular feature, DT can serve as the test app to test

Re: active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
Thank you so much! Let me know if you need anything from my side. We are about to deploy this for our company trigger system. This is very critical. On 12/8/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am investigating the problem, I will let you know when I figure it out, if you'd like, you can

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
I know what you mean. I just worked on the app that David was talking about those do need a separate module by themselves. I didn't realise his scenario until I saw the JIRA. I was talking about something like testsuite/web-testsuite/test-servlet25. This example builds a war and tests it in the

Multiple Producers sharing single queue

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
I need an urgent help I have many producers running on different thread need to share the same request queue.I am not getting how to implement this. I try to get some resolutions from FAQ's but was not able to understand the JNDIutil purpose fully also not sure whethar it will be useful in this

Re: Convention on dropping tests under the test framework

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
David, Check out this patch http://people.apache.org/~prasad/manifestcp.patch Apply it from the geronimo/testsuite/depoyment-testsuite directory. It will create 2 directories under it. -- The manifestcp will create the ear for. -- The test-manifestcp will deploy and undeploy it. Throw your

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2641) Missing license headers

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2641?page=all ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-2641: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller Missing license headers --- Key: GERONIMO-2641 URL:

Re: Help building Geronimo 1.2?

2006-12-08 Thread Christopher Blythe
I tried the Sun and IBM 1.5 JDKs? What should I be using? On 12/8/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What JDK are you using? On Dec 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote: Ran into the following while trying to build from the 1.2 branch today... I'm a little new to this, so...

Fwd: Re: selenium plugin?

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Hmm.. need to check this out too. Cheers Prasad -- Forwarded message -- From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Dec 8, 2006 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Re: selenium plugin? To: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org You can have a look at mavenium. It's a simple plugin that lets you use

[jira] Created: (AMQCPP-23) active-cpp persistent problem

2006-12-08 Thread james nomingo (JIRA)
active-cpp persistent problem - Key: AMQCPP-23 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-23 Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client Issue Type: Bug Components: Stomp Affects Versions: 1.0

Re: Multiple Producers sharing single queue

2006-12-08 Thread amq user
I assume you are running many CONSUMERs to share a same request queue. Then you should use topic instead of queue. All CONSUMER subscribed to that topic will get the message. On 12/8/06, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need an urgent help I have many producers running on different thread

Re: selenium plugin?

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
Eh, I think that the Selenium-IDE spitting out Java code to be included into a junit/testng test is far more useful. --jason On Dec 8, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Hmm.. need to check this out too. Cheers Prasad -- Forwarded message -- From: David [EMAIL

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-12-08 Thread Paul Grey
I ran into the same problem Phani describes here, and his solution worked for me. - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering-sample-application.html - 2 geronimo 1.1.1 instances (JRE 1.5.0_08) on Windows XP SP2 (same machine), configure as described, session failover works - 2 geronimo

Re: XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate

2006-12-08 Thread Christopher M. Cardona
I haven't used SVK before so maybe others can answer. AFAIK this is the first patch that was applied. Reading your comment on G-2594 you saying xmlParserApis and xalan is not necessary in trunk so do we need to revert this? Thanks, chris anita kulshreshtha wrote: hmm... This change was

Re: Multiple Producers sharing single queue

2006-12-08 Thread garima015
no i am using multiple producers also sharing the same request queue. Is there any method to get the existing queue? Thanks amq user wrote: I assume you are running many CONSUMERs to share a same request queue. Then you should use topic instead of queue. All CONSUMER subscribed to that

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2641) Missing license headers

2006-12-08 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2641?page=all ] Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2641: -- Attachment: license.patch Adds license headers to files that were missing it. This patch is for 1.2 branch. I hope I used the right version of the

[discuss] sun xsd's and dtd's in specs source tree

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller
As noted in GERONIMO-2630, our servlet and jsp specs include xsd's and dtd's which are copyrighted by Sun and contain the following restrictions: This document and the technology which it describes are distributed under licenses restricting their use, copying, distribution,

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2411) Add NOTICE and LICENSE files to CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=comments#action_12457000 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2411: Which specific CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts need attention? I checked a few CAR's and they had the correct

No legacy repos for Geronimo projects using Maven2

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon
Maven does not behave well with a mix of default and legacy repos. I have gone through and moved all legacy repos only to the modules where they are used, and in some cases imported a module-local repo to hold those artifacts so that the build does not need to include a legacy repo. A

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2411) Add NOTICE and LICENSE files to CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=comments#action_12457002 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2411: Because these files are released separate from the binary distributions (i.e. they are placed in maven

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2411) Add NOTICE and LICENSE files to CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts

2006-12-08 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=comments#action_12457005 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2411: I believe this is another fundamental flaw with Maven. The official release of a product like Geronimo is

Re: xalan : Re: svn commit: r483418 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-08 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Anita, I added this entry as it is expected as an endorsed library by the geronimo-boilerplate-minimal assembly. Without it, I cannot build this assembly. Are you saying that without it, you can successfully build this assembly? Thanks, Gianny On 08/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, anita

Re: xalan : Re: svn commit: r483418 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Gianny, Xalan was added accidentally to boilerplate-minimal assembly in rev 483346. No, I can not build without it. I will be removing it soon from both places.

Re: XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate

2006-12-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
XmlParserApis were also removed in rev 483063. If there was no other change made, it might be easier to revert 483346. Otherwise I will redo this work tomorrow morning (EST). Thanks Anita --- Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't used SVK before so maybe others can

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2411) Add NOTICE and LICENSE files to CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=comments#action_12457023 ] Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-2411: -- That's nice, but the current reality is the files are published independently. Therefore we need to make

Re: [discuss] sun xsd's and dtd's in specs source tree

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Have you checked if the server boots without these files? If not, we could could create dummy schemas with the names tomcat and jetty are looking for that simply allow all elements. -dain On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: As noted in GERONIMO-2630, our servlet and jsp specs

Disabled broken javamail test

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
For some reason this test just started failing, so I have disabled it. Hopefully someone that knows something about javamail can revive it. -dain On Dec 8, 2006, at 4:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: dain Date: Fri Dec 8 16:52:56 2006 New Revision: 484867 URL:

Re: svn commit: r483034 - /geronimo/server/trunk/applications/geronimo-welcome/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml

2006-12-08 Thread Gianny Damour
1.2 has been patched. Thanks, Gianny On 06/12/2006, at 11:37 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Do we need this fix in branches\1.2 too? --vamsi On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gdamour Date: Wed Dec 6 03:11:05 2006 New Revision: 483034 URL:

Re: Disabled broken javamail test

2006-12-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: For some reason this test just started failing, so I have disabled it. Hopefully someone that knows something about javamail can revive it. My bad, I think. I probably messed up a property file by adding a license header... I'll have a

Re: Disabled broken javamail test

2006-12-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I don't think the javamail default providers is a real properties file and it doesn't support comments. -dain On Dec 8, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: For some reason this test just started failing, so I have disabled it.

Re: No legacy repos for Geronimo projects using Maven2

2006-12-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 12/8/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we are going to continue to use Maven (which I'm starting to really wonder if it is worth it), .. (content clipped)... ... At this point... and ya, I may be in a bad mood now... I don't think that mvn is an appropriate tool for

Re: svn commit: r484869 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
The openejb2 (url below) still builds 2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT. How does this work? Thanks Anita URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb2 Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 Revision: 484898

Re: XALAN : Re: svn commit: r483346 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/login-modules.properties assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate

2006-12-08 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
In the commits to branch\1.2 may be we should indicate in the comment that the commit is meant for branch only. Will that help prevent those being merged into trunk using SVK? --vamsi On 12/8/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm... This change was only meant for the branch.

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2607) GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation

2006-12-08 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=all ] Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2607: - Attachment: modules.diff The modules.diff patch adds two methods to GBeanInfoBuilder: public void addOperation(String name, String

Re: Help building Geronimo 1.2?

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Was just curious...the sun should definitely work. On Dec 8, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote: I tried the Sun and IBM 1.5 JDKs? What should I be using? On 12/8/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What JDK are you using? On Dec 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:

DayTrader failures on 1.2 for SLSB JDBC Mode

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Chris/Piyush, I've incorporated a few of the patches which included the new Session JDBC work as well as the new table creation code from Piyush. I was getting some errors in deploying the application from trunk and had to add a few business nethods to the TradeBean class. Chris, did you

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2641) Missing license headers

2006-12-08 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2641?page=all ] Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2641: -- Attachment: license.patch.trunk Added patch for trunk. Missing license headers --- Key: GERONIMO-2641

Re: [discuss] sun xsd's and dtd's in specs source tree

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I'll help to get this done...getting permission or other options are going too take too long. I'll put them in sandbox/xsds and let you figure out what needs to be done from there Kevan. On Dec 8, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Thoughts, please... FYI the files are listed

Re: [discuss] sun xsd's and dtd's in specs source tree

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I've started the j2ee_1_4.xsd and will commit that one tomorrow. On Dec 9, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'll help to get this done...getting permission or other options are going too take too long. I'll put them in sandbox/xsds and let you figure out what needs to be done from

(SM-751) Flow tracing with correlation id, BPE and ODE

2006-12-08 Thread Grant M
On 12/8/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/7/06, Roger Menday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the impression that the servicemix-bpe component is not using the latest ode code - however, as it is today, this component *doesn't* seem to be sticking the correlationID, into