On Jan 10, 2008 2:20 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be great to get 2.1 out but I don't think its quite ready.
I think Gianny wants to get the ejb sfsb clustering in and I keep
finding problems and there are still a couple of things i want to add
to the console.
We all
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 610704 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080110/build-0300.log
Running
org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.condition.JexlConditionParserTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0
Probably we should change the test to let it choose from available protocols.
SY, Alexey
2007/12/29, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try adding the following line to this test:
corbaBean.getSslConfig().setProtocol(TLS);
so the code looks like:
Turns out there's this in the genesis pom:
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-release-plugin/artifactId
configuration
tagBasehttps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/
We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless somebody
objects, I'll cut one friday.
-David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3742:
---
Summary: Split up namespace upgrades into the modules that need them (was:
Spit up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3742.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 610760
Spit up namespace upgrades into the modules that need them
Jarek,
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately that didn't help, the stack
remains the same.
It seems the problem lies elsewhere.
Thanks anyway!
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Jarek Gawor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:28 AM
To:
Vasily,
When I tried to run this test with Harmony, it seemed to hang for me.
Didn't really investigate more than that why but I was curious if you
get that IOException error right away or after a while (e.g. after a
timeout).
Jarek
On Jan 10, 2008 6:09 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds good go me.
On 1/10/08, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless somebody
objects, I'll cut one friday.
-David
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Hi, all,
What is the current situation with the PKCS12 support in Geronimo?
I see the GERONIMO-2015 issue has a year-and-a-half history, it was
targeted at v2.0, but now v2.0.2 is already out there.
It looks like parts of the proposed functionality are already there, and
otherwise the patches
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:35 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557675#action_12557675
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2015:
---
Sun's PKCS12
David Jencks wrote:
Anyone interested in seeing if we can upgrade to AMQ 5 for g 2.1?
Apparently it has removed at least one of the annoying lets put a
non-string in system properties behaviors AMQ 4 liked to foist on us.
cf GERONIMO-3243
thanks
david jencks
I'll upgrade locally and
+1
++Vamsi
On Jan 10, 2008 4:05 PM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner reassigned GERONIMO-2682:
--
Assignee: (was: Jason Warner)
Sending a message throws a SendFailedException
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:40 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless
somebody objects, I'll cut one friday.
Sounds good to me.
--kevan
+1
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
r585608 | dain | 2007-10-17 10:56:54
I couple of questions here:
- Is it necessary for both Geronimo and OpenEJB3 to move to ActiveMQ
5.0.0 concurrently or can Geronimo do this independently of OpenEJB3?
- First thing I noticed was a build error. It seems that the
DefaultPersistenceAdapterFactory that is used by
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 610844 built with tests included
See the full build-1204.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080110/build-1204.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080110
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Another change:
r610695 | djencks | 2008-01-09 22:36:09 -0800 (Wed, 09 Jan 2008) | 1
line
GERONIMO-3718 remove unused class that should have stayed in g. when
it was still used
I wonder if the servicemix folks would like this to be osgi-ified
before this release?
I plan to look at
Hi Gianny, Happy New Year!
sorry for the delay in replying.
Could you update us on your guess for a time frame for the SFSB
clustering? Will this require OpenEJB changes? Is it realistic to
get this into 2.1?
On Jan 4, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
All, Happy New Year 2008!
Better naming convention for console plugins
Key: GERONIMO-3743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3743
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Chen updated GERONIMO-3744:
Attachment: p
Remove classname from option-keys.
Shorten the option names for
Shorten the option names for OpenejbRemoteLoginModule
-
Key: GERONIMO-3744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3744
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security
The following appear in both plugins and server/trunk/plugins. This
seems fundamentally wrong. I hope there is someone who knows what's
going on and can remove one of them or explain why there are 2?
activemq
console
debugviews
plancreator
pluto
system-database
thanks
david jencks
+1
-dain
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 3:40 AM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless
somebody
objects, I'll cut one friday.
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
David,
I'm not 100% on this, but I think some of them are actually just
lingering around that got moved into actual trunk and never got removed.
I know the dojo-1.0.1 plugin in there should go, and I will take care of
that now.
Thanks,
Erik B. Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jencks wrote:
+1
On 10/01/2008, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-dain
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 3:40 AM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless
somebody
objects, I'll cut one friday.
Hi All,
some time ago I started to put together some topics for Geronimo v2.1
documentation.
I tried to focus on the biggest new things we are offering now, topics we
didn't have before and now we need to start from scratch.
The Geronimo v2.1 documentation space is already available here
Clean up AdminConsoleExtensionGBean
---
Key: GERONIMO-3745
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3745
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
David,
The change of the
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/web/jetty/config-1.0 namespace is
now causing the test-jetty failure in trunk builds. It looks like the
old ../jetty/config-1.0 namespace is not being automatically upgraded
to .../jetty/config-1.0.1 namespace.
Here's the
Plugin Progress Bar Not Updating
Key: GERONIMO-3746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3745.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed rev 610984.
Clean up AdminConsoleExtensionGBean
That would have been a good idea to OSGify these components, but this is not
blocking, as we can still wrap them in OSGi bundles. Thanks anyway, i guess
I'll do that at some point in the coming weeks.
On Jan 10, 2008 9:10 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another change:
r610695 |
Thanks for telling me about this. I ran the testsuite before
committing and assumed that since it reported success at the end
there were no errors. This is wrong, it reports success no matter
what happens.
Is there some way the testsuite could be modified to fail on errors
or at least
+1
Anita
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 611019 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080110/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080110
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3743.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 611061.
I decided foo-console-jetty/tomcat was the best convention,
subprojects should use file system parent poms as parent poms in general
Key: GERONIMO-3747
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3747
Project: Geronimo
After the reorganization into plugins most everything still has its
old pom parent, either o.a.g.modules/modules or o.a.g.plugins/
plugins. This seems to me like a bad idea.
I don't see any problem fixing this for jars, but cars would need the
car plugin setup moved to perhaps the root
On Jan 11, 2008 7:12 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the reorganization into plugins most everything still has its
old pom parent, either o.a.g.modules/modules or o.a.g.plugins/
plugins. This seems to me like a bad idea.
Could you elaborate on why this is a bad idea?
Jacek
On Jan 10, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
- Is it necessary for both Geronimo and OpenEJB3 to move to ActiveMQ
5.0.0 concurrently or can Geronimo do this independently of OpenEJB3?
Should be possible to use whatever version we like in G independently
of OpenEJB.
-David
43 matches
Mail list logo
