Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread JB Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2021 à 21:16, Francois Papon a > écrit : > >  > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > Le 15/10/2021 à 15:47, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : >> Hi! >> >> I’d like to call a VOTE on the

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
+1 (binding) Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:55, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > +1 (thx, JL) > > Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 15:47 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > > Hi! > > > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > > 1.0.1 > >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Francois Papon
+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 15/10/2021 à 15:47, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > 1.0.1 > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Cesar Hernandez
+1 El vie, 15 oct 2021 a las 10:04, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO () escribió: > +1 (binding) > > Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:55, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > >> +1 (thx, JL) >> >> Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 15:47 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: >> > Hi! >> > >> >

[VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote is for the provider and the mail core. This is a re-roll because we were missing the spec update. Here is the staging repo

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Zowalla, Richard
+1 (thx, JL) Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 15:47 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > 1.0.1 > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote is > for the provider and the mail core. > > This is a

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Francois Papon
+1 (binding) Thanks Jean-Louis! regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 12/10/2021 à 22:51, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > 1.0.1 > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part.

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
I'll cancel this one and re-roll. Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:18, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > It would have been better yes > > Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:17, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > >> Shouldn't it be spec v1.0.1 in the POM: >> >>

[CANCEL][VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Even though it is not a legal issue, I'll reroll to update the spec part in the provider and mail. For javamail, they are all pretty much tight together so better to update spec Le mar. 12 oct. 2021 à 22:51, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
My own +1 Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 20:06, Cesar Hernandez a écrit : > As a side note, the first link works if you copy/paste the url, the link > itself hast the last digit as 1 instead of 2 > > [works] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1142 > trying > to

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Zowalla, Richard
Shouldn't it be spec v1.0.1 in the POM: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/blob/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1/geronimo-javamail_1.6/pom.xml#L46 I am just curios and might be wrong? :) Am Dienstag, dem 12.10.2021 um 22:51 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > Hi! > > I’d like to call a

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

2021-10-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
It would have been better yes Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:17, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > Shouldn't it be spec v1.0.1 in the POM: > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/blob/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1/geronimo-javamail_1.6/pom.xml#L46 > > I am just

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

2021-10-15 Thread Raymond Augé
+1 Ray On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 9:55 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > +1 (thx, JL) > > Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 15:47 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > > Hi! > > > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > > 1.0.1 > >