Re: ResourceAdapter.start() not getting called?

2004-07-11 Thread Gianny Damour
On 11/07/2004 5:24 AM, David Jencks wrote: Since it is unlikely that anyone will be running more than one TransactionManager/XATerminator in a geronimo server, perhaps this should be made a little clearer by specifying the WorkManager directly in the ResourceAdapter config and constructing a

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 6:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-267 Here is an overview of the issue:

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: org.apache.geronimo.gbean.jmx.NoSuchOperationError: No implementation method: objectName=geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=skeleton/app,J2EEModule=skeleton-ejb.jar,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=StatelessSessionBean,name=StatelessSession, method=public

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 12:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: I have just updated the way GBean attribute names are derived: When GBeans are proxied via RawGBeanInvokers, attribute names may start with an upper-case letter. For instance, if a GBean has a method

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-15 Thread Gianny Damour
On 15/07/2004 3:10 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: Sorry; indeed, this is perhaps not the right approach. However, I was pretty confident that this new behavior was more correct: As far as I understand, the JMX GBeanInvokers are used only when

Re: build broken (assembly module)?

2004-07-16 Thread Gianny Damour
On 16/07/2004 7:54 AM, David Jencks wrote: Can you check that your openejb copy is up to date? I've been trying to fix these case problems in both projects while doing actual development work and I think but am not entirely sure that at least this problem is fixed. These attribute names should

sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Hello, I am working on a prototype, sandbox/messaging, focused on providing the infrastructure for the implementation of clustered applications. This proto has reached a stage, which is according to me good enough for judgment. I will try to describe here the main features of this

Re: sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-21 Thread Gianny Damour
On 21/07/2004 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For clustering, we've been working quite heavily for some time on this abstraction... http://activecluster.codehaus.org/ (Note that ActiveCluster is not Geronimo specific and so can be used to build clusters or anything). The current

Unpacked module - RAR and WAR support

2004-07-23 Thread Gianny Damour
Hello, It is now possible to install unpacked RAR and WAR. I have been forced to introduce a temporary interface, namely ModuleBuilderWithUnpack, such that the build is not broken (OpenEJB impact). When OpenEJBModuleBuilder will also support unpacked EJB, this interface will need to be merged

Re: Proposal for output of assembly module

2004-08-08 Thread Gianny Damour
On 7/08/2004 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote: The assembly module doesn't conform to the maven standard action of producing an artifact, and its results are not in the module itself. Furthermore it doesn't produce an easily installable geronimo instance. I'd like to suggest that the assembly

Re: Dynamic classpaths

2004-08-25 Thread Gianny Damour
On 25/08/2004 2:45 AM, John Woolsey wrote: I am trying to deploy my bean and I need to add the jar to the classpath (I know rewrite my classloader) so that I can see classes and interfaces in the jar. Just wondering for a good spot to look for that. -

Re: help ! security realms

2004-08-25 Thread Gianny Damour
On 25/08/2004 2:43 AM, Prem kalyan wrote: hi all, I am going through the security part of geronimo and the corresponding deployment descriptor elements.I have few questions in this regard 1. What are all the different security realms supported in geronimo. 2. What values

Re: NullPointerException at findToolsJarFile

2004-09-13 Thread Gianny Damour
On 13/09/2004 9:12 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, I've decided to try to run the server with no additional arguments and here's what I got. Has anyone seen this before? It's a fresh build. /geronimo/modules/assembly/target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT $ java -jar bin/server.jar

Re: Problem building from subversion

2004-09-18 Thread Gianny Damour
On 18/09/2004 8:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Kristian Köhler wrote: Hi after refreshing from scm and running rebuild i get an error (attached). Am I alone? ;-) Oops, I'm checking it out This problem is fixed. It was due to the fact that the geronimo-tomcat artifact was not copied to the

Re: contextPriorityClassLoader

2004-10-07 Thread Gianny Damour
On 7/10/2004 3:34 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 6, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: BTW, I find the name contextPriorityClassLoader a bit non-intuitive, what do other app servers call this (specifically weblogic and webshpere). I'm still interested in this if anyone has the info... For

Re: error

2004-10-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/10/2004 3:20 AM, mouli wrote: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\asf\geronimo\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SN APSHOT\bin [mkdir] Created dir: C:\asf\geronimo\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SN APSHOT\config-store [echo] Building server.jar [java] Server URI:

Re: Praise Gianny

2004-10-15 Thread Gianny Damour
On 15/10/2004 2:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'd like to take a moment to praise Gianny for all his hard work on the CMP implementation. Gianny has quietly been working hard on the CMP implementation and has just completed a major chunk of CMP 2. I haven't reviewed the entire patch yet, but

CMP2.x - new features available - shake out phase

2004-10-16 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, We have recently hooked in what we believe is sufficient enough to give a fair try to petstore1.3.1_02. The new capabilities are (Dain, thanks for having logged these issues): * GERONIMO-177 - Support for user defined primary key classes: nothing very special in here; it is now possible to

Re: Build Error in Assembly

2004-10-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Mouli, A couple of tests have been added to detect File.delete or File.renameTo failures. Moreover, if File.renameTo fails, then an atttempt to create a new index file from scratch is done. Could you please update your local copy and give it another try? Thanks, Gianny On 20/10/2004 11:54

Re: [VOTE] M3 pre ApacheCon

2004-11-04 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny On 4/11/2004 3:48 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On the belief we need to formally vote on making a release, should we produce a M3 release?

Re: Vote: Remove old deployer, rename new deployer

2004-11-07 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 As an aside, the new deployer can not distribute unpacked modules. Is it intentional? Thanks, Gianny On 7/11/2004 4:35 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: I'd like to remove the current deployer.jar tool, remove the command-line processing logic from the Deployer class, rename new-deployer.jar to

Re: [VOTE] M3 pre ApacheCon

2004-11-08 Thread Gianny Damour
On 8/11/2004 8:19 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm not exactly ready to vote -1, but I think we should resolve these issues before M3: 1. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-386 Make cmp work with derby. Prove it with the itests I had a look to this one. I have committed a partial

BLOB manipulation - question

2004-11-28 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I am working on the support of Dependent Value Classes. The implementation is rather simple: if a binding is not explicitely defined for a CMP field class (see org.tranql.sql.jdbc.binding.BindingFactory) and if the class implements Serializable, then one assumes that the CMP field is a

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-01 Thread Gianny Damour
Dain, Jeremy, thanks for your replies. Here is a short description of what I have so far understood about LOB manipulations: setBinaryStream setBinaryStream does work with Derby, MySQL and Oracle (except where the content is bigger than 4k). The JDBC specifications 3.0 mandate that the method

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-04 Thread Gianny Damour
On 2/12/2004 11:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Great news. I suggest that we declare that we only officially support the 10g driver. Maybe add a wiki page with supported drivers. Good idea. This is in progress in here: http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Working_20with_20Enterprise_20JavaBeans

Re: EJB QL Support?

2005-01-03 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/12/2004 6:55 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Is anyone working on EJB QL support? There's a guy here at work who's interested in fussing with antlr and EJB QL, but I don't want to step on anyone if it's already underway. Aaron Happy New Year All! Aaron, could you please tell me if this task

Re: abstract-schema-name doesn't seem to work for CMP20

2005-01-05 Thread Gianny Damour
You are right: abstract-schema-name does not work. By now, one need to use the ejb-name instead of the abstract-schema-name in the basic EJBQL queries, which are currently supported. I have already fixed this bug on my working copy and will commit the fix as part of upcoming EJBQL stuff. I

Re: svn commit: r126427 - /geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java

2005-01-25 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi David, It seems that this is related to this JIRA issue: [ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-504?page=comments#action_55900 ] that Jeremy has commented. Thanks, Gianny On 26/01/2005 8:33 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to check that this doesn't violate any philosophical

Re: tranql test failure

2005-02-02 Thread gianny . damour
Sorry for that. I was pretty sure to have done a rebuild prior to commit... Dain, thanks for having fixed this problem. Gianny David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (haven't discovered a tranql list...) I'm getting a test failure in tranql on os x [junit] Running

Re: ObjectInputStream with classloading

2005-02-04 Thread Gianny Damour
On 4/02/2005 5:02 AM, David Jencks wrote: 1. tranql has 2 implementations, one using the thread context cl and one using a known classloader. These are both broken. However, tranql is required to build geronimo modules so I dont think we should have tranql require geronimo modules as well.

Re: Build was broken but might be fixed...

2005-02-05 Thread Gianny Damour
MockWebServiceInvoker has been wrongly committed? Thanks, Gianny On 5/02/2005 3:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: After getting too enthusiastic after fixing some bugs I checked in various files today that broke other things. My apologies. I think that everything is restored to working condition, I

EJB QL is now supported

2005-02-05 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, Just a quick mail to let you know that EJB QL is now supported. I am still in the process of writing JUnit tests, yet this is pretty it. I will keep GERONIMO-192 and GERONIMO-186 open until I complete my JUnit tests and will then close them. Meanwhile, if you discover a bug with the

RMI classloading

2005-03-18 Thread gianny . damour
Hi, I would like to know if it would be helpful to have a RMI class server. Currently, I see two potential usage: * deployment: currently, we need to be carefull about the exceptions nested within DeploymentException otherwise we will get a ClassNotFoundException. As a matter of fact, by

Assembly - two artefacts: assembly-deployer and assembly-server

2005-03-22 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I think that we should produce two artefacts as part of the assembly steps: * geronimo-assembly-server: only the stuff for the server; and * geronimo-assembly-deployer: only the stuff for the deployer. This way is it more easy for end-users to understand what is actually used by a geronimo

Re: Getting a YourKit License

2005-03-22 Thread gianny . damour
I am also interested. Thanks, Gianny Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Geronimo Developers, I shot an email out to the YourKit folks to see about getting a license for their most excellent profiler. Seems like the are willing to give us free licenses. Who interested, and

Re: Mark DeLaFranier - new Apache Geronimo committer

2005-03-27 Thread Gianny Damour
BTW Mark, I hope that you will accept this offer :). Congrats for your upcoming commit status and, indeed, thanks for your hard work on interop. Gianny On 27/03/2005 10:45 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Congratulation Mark and thank you for all the hard work you have in interop. -dain On Mar 25,

Re: Incompatible API change in Configuration

2005-04-04 Thread Gianny Damour
My bad :( I must admit that this is a side effect that I have not duly considered. I considered the source and binary compatibility and I missed this serialization specific incompatibility. Gianny On 3/04/2005 6:15 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On 3/22 in revision 158589 the API for Configuration

Re: John Sisson - new Apache Geronimo committer

2005-04-06 Thread Gianny Damour
On 6/04/2005 10:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks everyone! I would like to accept and I am waiting for approval from corporate legal. Regards, John Congratulations John! Gianny

Re: Spring cleaning

2005-04-09 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 I think that the webdav stuff should go too. Thanks, Gianny On 9/04/2005 1:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example,

Re: How to build Geronimo offline.

2005-06-01 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Kishor, You need to add these two lines in the project.properties file located under the root of the geronimo source code: maven.proxy.host=hostname maven.proxy.port=port Thanks, Gianny On 1/06/2005 10:28 PM, kishor wrote: The other problem is that I got Proxy sever to connect to

Re: Klustering and Kache

2006-06-17 Thread Gianny Damour
This is a great news! The WADI community is also working on providing clustering capabilities to Geonimo. The first-pass is still not yet checked-in and I expect to have it checked it next week. The implementation will provide: * pluggable replication strategy; * support of a large number of

Re: Namespace-driven builders and the UPA rule

2006-06-18 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, Is there a way to do this substitution of JACC implementation by providing a substitutionGroup attribute to the security element? This may be not be correct; yet, this could look like this: xs:complexType name=security xs:sequence xs:element ref=security:security

Re: Request change to RTC Process

2006-06-18 Thread Gianny Damour
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jacek Laskowski wrote: Let's take this as an example. As we haven't discussed it yet, it seems to me that such a change requires 3x+1 from PMC members. So, only when this vote (it should possibly be a separate vote

Re: [announce] Apache Geronimo welcomes Joe Bohn as our newest committer

2006-06-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Congratulations Joe! Gianny Sachin Patel wrote: In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn. Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of recent, the work on our minimal

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 1.1, DayTrader 1.1 and Specs 1.1 Final-2 Vote

2006-06-21 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Matt Hogstrom wrote: The corrections applied due to license files are first in this list. Thanks to John for dogging this. The distributions and builds were not affected. Based on previous feedback the vote continues. Thanks for your feedback. *Geronimo 1.1 Version*

Re: [VOTE] Release branching process (was Re: Life After 1.1 - starting the new branch for 1.1.1 - some logistics and your input requested.)

2006-06-22 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny David Blevins wrote: We had this whole conversation last week, lots of good discussion was had. I'd prefer not to have to have it again. Here is my exact understanding of our consensus and would like to put it to a vote to avoid reinterpretation of that consensus in the future.

WADI Integration Preview

2006-07-02 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I have been working on a second integration attempt of WADI and I am posting here a high-level description of the current state of progress such that people can jump in. At this stage, this is a Jetty only attempt and I do believe that the same approach can be applied for Tomcat. The

Re: [RTC] pluggable jacc

2006-07-04 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I had a look to the patch and I think that it will take me about one night to review it. As I will be on holidays this Friday, only 2 nights left, and away from any computer for 3 weeks, I am happy to vote now if need be. I do have a couple of questions, more for my education than

Re: [RTC] pluggable jacc

2006-07-04 Thread Gianny Damour
Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, I had a look to the patch and I think that it will take me about one night to review it. As I will be on holidays this Friday, only 2 nights left, and away from any computer for 3 weeks, I am happy to vote now if need be. I do have a couple of questions, more

Re: Patches in RTC (Geronimo - August 4, 2006)

2006-08-04 Thread Gianny Damour
) - Votes: 1 1 Donald Woods - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2224 [GERONIMO-2163] WADI Integration for Jetty - Assignee: Gianny Damour - Reporter: Gianny Damour - Created: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT) - Updated: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:03:16 -0700

Re: Regarding Exploded Deployments

2006-08-04 Thread Gianny Damour
Manu George wrote: Hi, Does Geronimo support exploded deployments of ear's that contain wars and jars using --inPlace Argument? When I try to deploy daytrader by extracting it to a directory and passing the path to the directory as an argument to deploy along with --inPlace it is giving

Re: Regarding Exploded Deployments

2006-08-07 Thread Gianny Damour
, then everything should be OK. Thanks, Gianny Manu George wrote: Hi Gianny, Thanks for the explanation. Are ejb modules also auto exploded? I saw that war's are exploded but ejb modules don't seem to be auto exploded. Any reason for this? Thanks Manu On 8/5/06, Gianny Damour

Re: Drop the m1 build

2006-08-07 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Dain Sundstrom wrote: I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several days now and no one has noticed. Here is my vote: +1 to remove the m1 build -dain

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome alan Cabrera as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2006-08-14 Thread Gianny Damour
Congrats Alan! Gianny On 15/08/2006, at 4:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to his

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny On 16/08/2006, at 11:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: +1...good first step Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn mkdir

Re: svn commit: r432773 - /geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-testsupport/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/testsupport/TestSupport.java

2006-08-18 Thread Gianny Damour
On 19/08/2006, at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdillon Date: Fri Aug 18 16:15:53 2006 New Revision: 432773 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432773view=rev Log: Comments about BASEDIR and IDE magic Modified: geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-testsupport/src/main/java/org/

[RTC] WADI Integration for Jetty

2006-08-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I sent an email some time ago about some work being done to integrate WADI once again with Geronimo (subject was WADI Integration Preview). In the current stage, load-balancing is working reliably with two Geronimo instances behind an Apache server using mod_rewrite. I would like

Re: TranQL EJBQL

2006-08-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Andrus, Indeed, so far there is no plan to implement JPA on top of TranQL. Thanks for asking if your JPA QL work could somehow benefit to TranQL. Also, if you find some interesting pieces of code in TranQL that you would like to reuse, then please feel free to let me know. Thanks,

Re: Disallow 1.5 on trunk (until its actually supported)?

2006-08-20 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny On 20/08/2006, at 5:44 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I keep running into problems switching my local jdk (ala setjdk) from 1.4 to 1.5 and forgetting to switch it back again when making G builds. I though it would be nice if the build would fail early if I had the wrong JDK

Re: svn commit: r432773 - /geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-testsupport/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/testsupport/TestSupport.java

2006-08-20 Thread Gianny Damour
... probably sometime next week. --jason On Aug 18, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Gianny Damour wrote: On 19/08/2006, at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdillon Date: Fri Aug 18 16:15:53 2006 New Revision: 432773 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432773view=rev Log: Comments about BASEDIR

Re: [RTC] WADI Integration for Jetty

2006-08-21 Thread Gianny Damour
. Apologies for my tardiness. There is also some clustering work in sandbox that I think Jeff was working on. Are these complimentary efforts or completely separate? Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, I sent an email some time ago about some work being done to integrate WADI once again with Geronimo (subject

Re: svn commit: r394422 - in /geronimo/branches/1.1/modules: deploy-jsr88/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin/jmx/ deploy-jsr88/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin/local/ deploy-

2006-04-16 Thread Gianny Damour
Actually, my first pass was an ExtendedDeploymentManager defining a distribute method taking such an additional parameter. I drop this idea to implement this one because I wanted to stick to the JSR88 API. Thanks, Gianny Aaron Mulder wrote: OK. A little cheesy to set the flag, do the

Re: svn commit: r394439 [1/3] - in /geronimo/branches/1.1: ./ applications/console-core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/console/util/ applications/console-standard/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/console/ca

2006-04-16 Thread Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: ammulder Date: Sat Apr 15 23:35:09 2006 New Revision: 394439 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394439view=rev Log: Services can be deployed with a JAR and plan, or a plan in the JAR at META-INF/geronimo-service.xml (GERONIMO-1859) Improvements to

Re: svn commit: r394439 [1/3] - in /geronimo/branches/1.1: ./ applications/console-core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/console/util/ applications/console-standard/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/console/ca

2006-04-16 Thread Gianny Damour
Actually, I hooked it in during my last commit; so, you can give it a shoot now. Thanks, Gianny Aaron Mulder wrote: On 4/16/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have refactored DeploymentContext to easily add support for in-place deployment of services (in a few words

in-place deployment - description

2006-04-18 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I think that in-place deployment is now complete and here is a short description of how it works: * a module is deployed in-place, via the distribute --inPlace usual parameters command; * only unpacked modules can be deployed in-place. If a packed module is deployed in-place, then the

Re: [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1871) Unable to deploy Tapestry app due to classloading issue

2006-04-22 Thread Gianny Damour
? This is a pretty nasty bug. Jeff Gianny Damour (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1871?page=all ] Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-1871: --- Resolution: Fixed The problem was that the TCCL was set to the Tomcat

Re: [announce] Welcome Apache Geronimo's newest committer - Rick McGuire

2006-04-24 Thread Gianny Damour
Well done Rick and Welcome on board! Gianny Kevan Miller wrote: Congratulations Rick! --kevan On Apr 21, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the

Re: 1.1 Build failure

2006-04-25 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Rick, I also faced this problem and just checked in a fix for it. Thanks, Gianny Rick McGuire wrote: I'm getting a build failure that I don't seem to see anybody else getting. I'm doing fresh checkout and build, and the build fails with the following error: test:test: [echo] No

Re: [announce] Apache Geronimo welcomes Guillaume Nodet as our newest committer

2006-04-29 Thread Gianny Damour
Congratulations Guillaume! Gianny Dain Sundstrom wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC is proud to announce Guillaume Nodet as our newest Apache Geronimo committer, and look forward to his continued great work on XBean and the Geronimo integration with Service Mix. His work shows initiative,

Re: [wadi-dev] Re: Tomcat version in G1.1 for clustering

2006-05-03 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, Jeff, I do know that you are working hard on preparing the release of G1.1; however, when you get more time, could you please try to expand a little bit on this subject? I am curious to see how the Session API has been implemented and how it is leveraged to provide clustering

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Gianny Damour
Kevan Miller wrote: On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload1.1-devto1.1 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty from 5.1.9

Re: Remaining 1.1 Issues

2006-05-23 Thread Gianny Damour
Matt Hogstrom wrote: Based on the list below I think 1,2 and 3 are new function and 4 is a bug fix. Aaron Mulder wrote: Here are the things that I still want to squeeze into 1.1: - fix console JMS to accept new providers at runtime - fix console security realms to accept new providers at

Re: Moving on from 1.1

2006-05-23 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Matt Hogstrom wrote: Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2 for the release. Here is the proposed nomenclature trunk(stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with branches/1.1) branches/1.1unchanged branches/dead-1.2 (is a copy of the original

Re: PATCH from GERONIMO-2006

2006-05-23 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny David Jencks wrote: I'd like to apply the patch http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ attachment/12334350/GERONIMO-2006.patch from http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006 It fixes a buffer overflow problem in tomcat (which presumably doesn't need a vote since it's a

Re: [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Geronimo

2006-05-29 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I think that Continuum needs some help here. Can someone who has access to stan try to sort it out? (I think that deleting modules/console-web should do the trick). Thanks, Gianny continuum wrote: Online report :

Booth at OSCON Portland - IBM logistical and financial support

2006-06-02 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I believe that OSCON is offering free booth space to the ASF. The registration deadline for the next OSCON in Portland (end of July) is this Monday, June 5. IBM is offering the PRC logistical and financial support, e.g. t-shirts et cetera, for this upcoming event. IBM wants to help as

Re: Results of testing Gianny's TranQL Performance Improvements for CMP entity beans

2006-06-05 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Matt, Thanks for posting these results :) Matt Hogstrom wrote: Gianny, I applied your changes to fix the double execution. It looks like the modifications you made overall improved performance by about 10% (from 1445 to 1591). However, I still see the double execution of the SQL for

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1638) Multiple servers sharing the same repo and config store

2006-06-09 Thread Gianny Damour
--- Key: GERONIMO-1638 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1638 Project: Geronimo Type: New Feature Security: public(Regular issues) Components: usability Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Gianny Damour Assignee: John Sisson Fix

Re: Key Generator Questions

2006-06-13 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Neal, Thanks for this feedabck. You are correct: it is pretty easy to write some initialization code to create a sequence table and insert a value. As a matter of fact, if you have a look to org.tranql.pkgenerator.SequenceTablePrimaryKeyGenerator.initSequenceTable() you can see that is is

Re: RELEASE-NOTES-1.1

2006-06-14 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Donald, There are very good points. How would you expect the server to behave in such scenarios? Currently the server will simply shut-down and, to some extent, I think that this is a safe behaviour. Thanks, Gianny Donald Woods wrote: What happens in the case that the files no longer

Re: [VOTE] Matt Hogstrom as Release Manager (Re: Getting V1.0 out the door - first step ;-P)

2005-11-17 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Davanum Srinivas wrote: +1 for Matt as the Release Manager. Let's do it :) Matt, Please familiarize yourself with how other projects do it and how prev releases were done. First step would be a release plan. thanks, dims On 10/19/05, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: NEW - [VOTE] sponsor WADI to become sub-projects of Geronimo

2005-11-18 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Jeff Genender wrote: The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposal is here... http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project during incubation [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny David Blevins wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB during incubation [ ]

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: OpenEJB Question

2005-12-10 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Manu, This method is always supposed to get a String value. When a custom primary key is used, its type must be declared in the ejb-jar.xml DD via the prim-key-class element. Also, the primkey-field elements in both the ejb-jar.xml DD and openejb-jar.xml DD must not be set; these elements

Re: Fwd: OpenEJB Question

2005-12-13 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Manu, Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder, which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the number of primary key fields. This is now fixed. I will create a JIRA to track this issue tomorrow as it seems that JIRA is down tonight. Thanks,

Re: Fwd: OpenEJB Question

2005-12-13 Thread Gianny Damour
/13/05, *Gianny Damour* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Manu, Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder, which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the number of primary key fields. This is now fixed. I

Re: Fwd: OpenEJB Question

2005-12-14 Thread Gianny Damour
decide to re-cut OpenEJB. Thanks, Gianny Aaron Mulder wrote: Gianny, Did the fix go into TranQL? Geronimo 1.0 is not using a TranQL snapshot right now, so someone would need to cut a new TranQL release for us to get the fix into Geronimo 1.0. Thanks, Aaron On 12/13/05, Gianny Damour [EMAIL

Re: OpenEJB PK issue

2005-12-14 Thread Gianny Damour
You are right! And thanks for reviewing my commits :) Indeed, buildFaultHandler is still creating the wrong type of IdentityDefiner. I thought that all dependencies on the various IdentityDefiner implementations were removed from OpenEJB thanks to the introduction of IdentityDefinerBuilder;

Re: Another OpenEJB Question

2005-12-15 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I am surpised that OrderItem.setOrder_orderId gives an error. Could you please provide the stack trace (the TranQL part + the first OpenEJB element) along with the DDs? FWIW, there are a couple of integration tests for CMP and CMR overlap scenarios in the OpenEJB tree: sub-project:

Re: OpenEJB PK issue

2005-12-15 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Manu, Once again, thanks for your debugging! I had a look to the DD and I have identified why the itests showing this specifc case are working for us and not for you: basically in our test, we have a OTM relationship between a CMP with a simple PK on the one-side and a CMP with a compound

Re: Regarding JIRA Geronimo-1374

2005-12-21 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Manu, I think that a new accessor for this specific case is a good idea. The set method is exactly what it should be. Though, I think that we should drop the pkClass.isIntance test: this set method is always invoked with a CMP value, which is the unique field defined by the compound PK

Re: GBean for auto generation of primary key

2006-01-03 Thread Gianny Damour
Hello Rakesh, It is definitively useful. Dain has already created a JIRA for this issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1133. To contribute your custom PrimaryKeyGenerator, you need to attach to this JIRA your implementation and select the Grant license to ASF... radio button.

Re: Fwd: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?]

2006-01-04 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Release 1.0 Gianny Sachin Patel wrote: forwarding this on behalf of Matt... - sachin Begin forwarded message: *From: *Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date: *January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM EST *To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject: **[Fwd:

Re: Regd OpenEJB

2006-01-06 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Manu, You are once again correct: let's remove this read-only decorator - this was a very bad idea - at least if the field is a PK one. This read only behavior was intended to prevent developers from changing a relationship to a CMP having a coumpond PK with multiple fields. Indeed, in

Re: Regd OpenEJB

2006-01-10 Thread Gianny Damour
and CMRMappedToOwningPKCMP. I think that the first thing to do is to add support for your very first scenario. I think that this is more or less that code snippet that you have submitted a couple of days ago. Thanks, Gianny Thanks Manu On 1/7/06, *Gianny Damour* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: WADI clustering

2006-01-18 Thread Gianny Damour
Rajith Attapattu wrote: More question if you don't mind. 2.) Assuming sombody wants to do session replication (All Active) instead of (one Active and n backups) is there provision within the WADI api to plug in this stratergy? I'm giving this some thought in terms of SFSB support, I'm

Re: [VOTE] Documentation in Confluence, MoinMoin, or..

2006-01-20 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Confluence Gianny Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation, either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will close in one week, at

Re: Compilation errors in module javamail-transport

2006-02-08 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, In this situation, I think that you should try: maven -U clean install -U means that newer versions of plugins should be checked from the plugin repositories. Thanks, Gianny Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Got the following error trying to build geronimo-spec-javamail. Help

Re: NPE in HOWLLog in boot

2006-02-09 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi Jason, This has now been fixed. XidFactory is now being properly injected and G should start fine. Thanks, Gianny Jason Dillon wrote: I'm not sure how I got G into this state, but its barfing on boot with: snip Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_09)... Started configuration 1/16

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >