On 11/07/2004 5:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Since it is unlikely that anyone will be running more than one
TransactionManager/XATerminator in a geronimo server, perhaps this
should be made a little clearer by specifying the WorkManager
directly in the ResourceAdapter config and constructing a
On 14/07/2004 6:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-267
Here is an overview of the issue:
On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.jmx.NoSuchOperationError: No implementation
method:
objectName=geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=skeleton/app,J2EEModule=skeleton-ejb.jar,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=StatelessSessionBean,name=StatelessSession,
method=public
On 14/07/2004 12:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
I have just updated the way GBean attribute names are derived:
When GBeans are proxied via RawGBeanInvokers, attribute names may
start with an upper-case letter. For instance, if a GBean has a
method
On 15/07/2004 3:10 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Sorry; indeed, this is perhaps not the right approach. However, I was
pretty confident that this new behavior was more correct:
As far as I understand, the JMX GBeanInvokers are used only when
On 16/07/2004 7:54 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Can you check that your openejb copy is up to date? I've been trying
to fix these case problems in both projects while doing actual
development work and I think but am not entirely sure that at least
this problem is fixed. These attribute names should
Hello,
I am working on a prototype, sandbox/messaging, focused on providing the
infrastructure for the implementation of clustered applications. This
proto has reached a stage, which is according to me good enough for
judgment.
I will try to describe here the main features of this
On 21/07/2004 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For clustering, we've been working quite heavily for some time on this
abstraction...
http://activecluster.codehaus.org/
(Note that ActiveCluster is not Geronimo specific and so can be used
to build clusters or anything).
The current
Hello,
It is now possible to install unpacked RAR and WAR. I have been forced
to introduce a temporary interface, namely ModuleBuilderWithUnpack, such
that the build is not broken (OpenEJB impact). When OpenEJBModuleBuilder
will also support unpacked EJB, this interface will need to be merged
On 7/08/2004 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The assembly module doesn't conform to the maven standard action of
producing an artifact, and its results are not in the module itself.
Furthermore it doesn't produce an easily installable geronimo instance.
I'd like to suggest that the assembly
On 25/08/2004 2:45 AM, John Woolsey wrote:
I am trying to deploy my bean and I need to add the jar to the classpath (I
know rewrite my classloader) so that I can see classes and interfaces in the
jar. Just wondering for a good spot to look for that.
-
On 25/08/2004 2:43 AM, Prem kalyan wrote:
hi all,
I am going through the security part of geronimo and the
corresponding deployment descriptor elements.I have few questions in
this regard
1. What are all the different security realms supported in geronimo.
2. What values
On 13/09/2004 9:12 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I've decided to try to run the server with no additional arguments
and here's what I got. Has anyone seen this before? It's a fresh build.
/geronimo/modules/assembly/target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
$ java -jar bin/server.jar
On 18/09/2004 8:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Kristian Köhler wrote:
Hi
after refreshing from scm and running rebuild i get an error
(attached). Am I alone? ;-)
Oops, I'm checking it out
This problem is fixed. It was due to the fact that the geronimo-tomcat
artifact was not copied to the
On 7/10/2004 3:34 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 6, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
BTW, I find the name contextPriorityClassLoader a bit
non-intuitive, what do other app servers call this (specifically
weblogic and webshpere).
I'm still interested in this if anyone has the info...
For
On 14/10/2004 3:20 AM, mouli wrote:
[mkdir] Created dir:
C:\asf\geronimo\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SN
APSHOT\bin
[mkdir] Created dir:
C:\asf\geronimo\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SN
APSHOT\config-store
[echo] Building server.jar
[java] Server URI:
On 15/10/2004 2:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'd like to take a moment to praise Gianny for all his hard work on
the CMP implementation. Gianny has quietly been working hard on the
CMP implementation and has just completed a major chunk of CMP 2. I
haven't reviewed the entire patch yet, but
Hi,
We have recently hooked in what we believe is sufficient enough to give
a fair try to petstore1.3.1_02.
The new capabilities are (Dain, thanks for having logged these issues):
* GERONIMO-177 - Support for user defined primary key classes: nothing
very special in here; it is now possible to
Hi Mouli,
A couple of tests have been added to detect File.delete or File.renameTo
failures. Moreover, if File.renameTo fails, then an atttempt to create a
new index file from scratch is done.
Could you please update your local copy and give it another try?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 20/10/2004 11:54
+1
Gianny
On 4/11/2004 3:48 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On the belief we need to formally vote on making a release, should we
produce a M3 release?
+1
As an aside, the new deployer can not distribute unpacked modules. Is it
intentional?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 7/11/2004 4:35 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'd like to remove the current deployer.jar tool, remove the
command-line processing logic from the Deployer class, rename
new-deployer.jar to
On 8/11/2004 8:19 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm not exactly ready to vote -1, but I think we should resolve these
issues before M3:
1. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-386 Make cmp work
with derby. Prove it with the itests
I had a look to this one. I have committed a partial
Hi,
I am working on the support of Dependent Value Classes.
The implementation is rather simple: if a binding is not explicitely
defined for a CMP field class (see
org.tranql.sql.jdbc.binding.BindingFactory) and if the class implements
Serializable, then one assumes that the CMP field is a
Dain, Jeremy, thanks for your replies.
Here is a short description of what I have so far understood about LOB
manipulations:
setBinaryStream
setBinaryStream does work with Derby, MySQL and Oracle (except where the
content is bigger than 4k). The JDBC specifications 3.0 mandate that
the method
On 2/12/2004 11:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Great news. I suggest that we declare that we only officially support
the 10g driver. Maybe add a wiki page with supported drivers.
Good idea.
This is in progress in here:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Working_20with_20Enterprise_20JavaBeans
On 14/12/2004 6:55 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Is anyone working on EJB QL support? There's a guy here at work
who's interested in fussing with antlr and EJB QL, but I don't want to
step on anyone if it's already underway.
Aaron
Happy New Year All!
Aaron, could you please tell me if this task
You are right: abstract-schema-name does not work. By now, one need to
use the ejb-name instead of the abstract-schema-name in the basic EJBQL
queries, which are currently supported.
I have already fixed this bug on my working copy and will commit the fix
as part of upcoming EJBQL stuff. I
Hi David,
It seems that this is related to this JIRA issue:
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-504?page=comments#action_55900
]
that Jeremy has commented.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 26/01/2005 8:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to check that this doesn't violate any philosophical
Sorry for that. I was pretty sure to have done a rebuild prior to commit...
Dain, thanks for having fixed this problem.
Gianny
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(haven't discovered a tranql list...)
I'm getting a test failure in tranql on os x
[junit] Running
On 4/02/2005 5:02 AM, David Jencks wrote:
1. tranql has 2 implementations, one using the thread context cl and
one using a known classloader. These are both broken. However,
tranql is required to build geronimo modules so I dont think we
should have tranql require geronimo modules as well.
MockWebServiceInvoker has been wrongly committed?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 5/02/2005 3:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
After getting too enthusiastic after fixing some bugs I checked in
various files today that broke other things. My apologies.
I think that everything is restored to working condition, I
Hi,
Just a quick mail to let you know that EJB QL is now supported. I am
still in the process of writing JUnit tests, yet this is pretty it.
I will keep GERONIMO-192 and GERONIMO-186 open until I complete my JUnit
tests and will then close them. Meanwhile, if you discover a bug with
the
Hi,
I would like to know if it would be helpful to have a RMI class server.
Currently, I see two potential usage:
* deployment: currently, we need to be carefull about the exceptions nested
within
DeploymentException otherwise we will get a ClassNotFoundException. As a matter
of
fact, by
Hi,
I think that we should produce two artefacts as part of the assembly steps:
* geronimo-assembly-server: only the stuff for the server; and
* geronimo-assembly-deployer: only the stuff for the deployer.
This way is it more easy for end-users to understand what is actually
used by a geronimo
I am also interested.
Thanks,
Gianny
Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Geronimo Developers,
I shot an email out to the YourKit folks to see about getting a license
for their most excellent profiler. Seems like the are willing to give
us free licenses. Who interested, and
BTW Mark, I hope that you will accept this offer :).
Congrats for your upcoming commit status and, indeed, thanks for your
hard work on interop.
Gianny
On 27/03/2005 10:45 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Congratulation Mark and thank you for all the hard work you have in
interop.
-dain
On Mar 25,
My bad :(
I must admit that this is a side effect that I have not duly considered.
I considered the source and binary compatibility and I missed this
serialization specific incompatibility.
Gianny
On 3/04/2005 6:15 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 3/22 in revision 158589 the API for Configuration
On 6/04/2005 10:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I would like to accept and I am waiting for approval from corporate legal.
Regards,
John
Congratulations John!
Gianny
+1
I think that the webdav stuff should go too.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 9/04/2005 1:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some
of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to
propose a spring-cleaning exercise.
For example,
Hi Kishor,
You need to add these two lines in the project.properties file located
under the root of the geronimo source code:
maven.proxy.host=hostname
maven.proxy.port=port
Thanks,
Gianny
On 1/06/2005 10:28 PM, kishor wrote:
The other problem is that I got Proxy sever to connect to
This is a great news!
The WADI community is also working on providing clustering capabilities
to Geonimo. The first-pass is still not yet checked-in and I expect to
have it checked it next week.
The implementation will provide:
* pluggable replication strategy;
* support of a large number of
Hi,
Is there a way to do this substitution of JACC implementation by
providing a substitutionGroup attribute to the security element?
This may be not be correct; yet, this could look like this:
xs:complexType name=security
xs:sequence
xs:element ref=security:security
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Let's take this as an example. As we haven't discussed it yet, it
seems to me that such a change requires 3x+1 from PMC members. So,
only when this vote (it should possibly be a separate vote
Congratulations Joe!
Gianny
Sachin Patel wrote:
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community,
the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of
recent, the work on our minimal
+1
Gianny
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The corrections applied due to license files are first in this list.
Thanks to John for dogging this.
The distributions and builds were not affected. Based on previous
feedback the vote continues. Thanks for your feedback.
*Geronimo 1.1 Version*
+1
Gianny
David Blevins wrote:
We had this whole conversation last week, lots of good discussion was
had. I'd prefer not to have to have it again. Here is my exact
understanding of our consensus and would like to put it to a vote to
avoid reinterpretation of that consensus in the future.
Hi,
I have been working on a second integration attempt of WADI and I am
posting here a high-level description of the current state of progress
such that people can jump in.
At this stage, this is a Jetty only attempt and I do believe that the
same approach can be applied for Tomcat. The
Hi,
I had a look to the patch and I think that it will take me about one
night to review it. As I will be on holidays this Friday, only 2 nights
left, and away from any computer for 3 weeks, I am happy to vote now if
need be.
I do have a couple of questions, more for my education than
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I had a look to the patch and I think that it will take me about one
night to review it. As I will be on holidays this Friday, only 2
nights left, and away from any computer for 3 weeks, I am happy to
vote now if need be.
I do have a couple of questions, more
)
- Votes: 1
1 Donald Woods
- http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2224
[GERONIMO-2163] WADI Integration for Jetty
- Assignee: Gianny Damour
- Reporter: Gianny Damour
- Created: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
- Updated: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:03:16 -0700
Manu George wrote:
Hi,
Does Geronimo support exploded deployments of ear's that
contain wars and jars using --inPlace Argument? When I try to deploy
daytrader by extracting it to a directory and passing the path to the
directory as an argument to deploy along with --inPlace it is giving
, then everything should be OK.
Thanks,
Gianny
Manu George wrote:
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the explanation. Are ejb modules also auto
exploded? I saw that war's are exploded but ejb modules don't seem to
be auto exploded. Any reason for this?
Thanks
Manu
On 8/5/06, Gianny Damour
+1
Gianny
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several
days now and no one has noticed. Here is my vote:
+1 to remove the m1 build
-dain
Congrats Alan!
Gianny
On 15/08/2006, at 4:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan
Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We
are excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in
addition to his
+1
Gianny
On 16/08/2006, at 11:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1...good first step
Jason Dillon wrote:
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to
server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more
consistent.
Specifically, I think we should:
svn mkdir
On 19/08/2006, at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Fri Aug 18 16:15:53 2006
New Revision: 432773
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432773view=rev
Log:
Comments about BASEDIR and IDE magic
Modified:
geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-testsupport/src/main/java/org/
Hi,
I sent an email some time ago about some work being done to integrate
WADI once again with Geronimo (subject was WADI Integration Preview).
In the current stage, load-balancing is working reliably with two
Geronimo instances behind an Apache server using mod_rewrite. I would
like
Hi Andrus,
Indeed, so far there is no plan to implement JPA on top of TranQL.
Thanks for asking if your JPA QL work could somehow benefit to
TranQL. Also, if you find some interesting pieces of code in TranQL
that you would like to reuse, then please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
+1
Gianny
On 20/08/2006, at 5:44 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I keep running into problems switching my local jdk (ala setjdk)
from 1.4 to 1.5 and forgetting to switch it back again when making
G builds.
I though it would be nice if the build would fail early if I had
the wrong JDK
... probably sometime next week.
--jason
On Aug 18, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 19/08/2006, at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Fri Aug 18 16:15:53 2006
New Revision: 432773
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432773view=rev
Log:
Comments about BASEDIR
. Apologies for my tardiness.
There is also some clustering work in sandbox that I think Jeff was
working on. Are these complimentary efforts or completely separate?
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I sent an email some time ago about some work being done to
integrate WADI once again with Geronimo (subject
Actually, my first pass was an ExtendedDeploymentManager defining a
distribute method taking such an additional parameter. I drop this idea
to implement this one because I wanted to stick to the JSR88 API.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK. A little cheesy to set the flag, do the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Sat Apr 15 23:35:09 2006
New Revision: 394439
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394439view=rev
Log:
Services can be deployed with a JAR and plan, or a plan in the JAR at
META-INF/geronimo-service.xml (GERONIMO-1859)
Improvements to
Actually, I hooked it in during my last commit; so, you can give it a
shoot now.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 4/16/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have refactored DeploymentContext to easily add support for in-place
deployment of services (in a few words
Hi,
I think that in-place deployment is now complete and here is a short
description of how it works:
* a module is deployed in-place, via the distribute --inPlace usual
parameters command;
* only unpacked modules can be deployed in-place. If a packed module is
deployed in-place, then the
? This is a pretty nasty bug.
Jeff
Gianny Damour (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1871?page=all ]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-1871:
---
Resolution: Fixed
The problem was that the TCCL was set to the Tomcat
Well done Rick and Welcome on board!
Gianny
Kevan Miller wrote:
Congratulations Rick!
--kevan
On Apr 21, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache
Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the
Hi Rick,
I also faced this problem and just checked in a fix for it.
Thanks,
Gianny
Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm getting a build failure that I don't seem to see anybody else
getting. I'm doing fresh checkout and build, and the build fails with
the following error:
test:test:
[echo] No
Congratulations Guillaume!
Gianny
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC is proud to announce Guillaume Nodet as our
newest Apache Geronimo committer, and look forward to his continued
great work on XBean and the Geronimo integration with Service Mix.
His work shows initiative,
Hi,
Jeff, I do know that you are working hard on preparing the release of
G1.1; however, when you get more time, could you please try to expand a
little bit on this subject?
I am curious to see how the Session API has been implemented and how it
is leveraged to provide clustering
Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Consolidated list so far is:
Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4
commons-fileupload1.1-devto1.1
jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15
Jetty from 5.1.9
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Based on the list below I think 1,2 and 3 are new function and 4 is a
bug fix.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Here are the things that I still want to squeeze into 1.1:
- fix console JMS to accept new providers at runtime
- fix console security realms to accept new providers at
+1
Gianny
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2 for
the release.
Here is the proposed nomenclature
trunk(stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with branches/1.1)
branches/1.1unchanged
branches/dead-1.2 (is a copy of the original
+1
Gianny
David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to apply the patch http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
attachment/12334350/GERONIMO-2006.patch
from http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006
It fixes a buffer overflow problem in tomcat (which presumably
doesn't need a vote since it's a
Hi,
I think that Continuum needs some help here. Can someone who has access
to stan try to sort it out? (I think that deleting modules/console-web
should do the trick).
Thanks,
Gianny
continuum wrote:
Online report :
Hi,
I believe that OSCON is offering free booth space to the ASF. The
registration deadline for the next OSCON in Portland (end of July) is
this Monday, June 5.
IBM is offering the PRC logistical and financial support, e.g. t-shirts
et cetera, for this upcoming event. IBM wants to help as
Hi Matt,
Thanks for posting these results :)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Gianny,
I applied your changes to fix the double execution. It looks like the
modifications you made overall improved performance by about 10% (from
1445 to 1591). However, I still see the double execution of the SQL
for
---
Key: GERONIMO-1638
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1638
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public(Regular issues) Components: usability
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: John Sisson
Fix
Hi Neal,
Thanks for this feedabck. You are correct: it is pretty easy to write
some initialization code to create a sequence table and insert a value.
As a matter of fact, if you have a look to
org.tranql.pkgenerator.SequenceTablePrimaryKeyGenerator.initSequenceTable()
you can see that is is
Hi Donald,
There are very good points. How would you expect the server to behave in
such scenarios? Currently the server will simply shut-down and, to some
extent, I think that this is a safe behaviour.
Thanks,
Gianny
Donald Woods wrote:
What happens in the case that the files no longer
+1
Gianny
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 for Matt as the Release Manager. Let's do it :)
Matt,
Please familiarize yourself with how other projects do it and how prev
releases were done. First step would be a release plan.
thanks,
dims
On 10/19/05, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Gianny
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a
Geronimo sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project
during incubation
[ ]
+1
Gianny
David Blevins wrote:
The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a
Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB
during incubation
[ ]
+1
Gianny
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an
alternate branching proposal.
[ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7
[ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative
Matt
Hi Manu,
This method is always supposed to get a String value.
When a custom primary key is used, its type must be declared in the
ejb-jar.xml DD via the prim-key-class element. Also, the primkey-field
elements in both the ejb-jar.xml DD and openejb-jar.xml DD must not be
set; these elements
Hi Manu,
Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder,
which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the number
of primary key fields.
This is now fixed.
I will create a JIRA to track this issue tomorrow as it seems that JIRA
is down tonight.
Thanks,
/13/05, *Gianny Damour* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu,
Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder,
which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the number
of primary key fields.
This is now fixed.
I
decide to
re-cut OpenEJB.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Gianny,
Did the fix go into TranQL? Geronimo 1.0 is not using a TranQL
snapshot right now, so someone would need to cut a new TranQL release
for us to get the fix into Geronimo 1.0.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 12/13/05, Gianny Damour [EMAIL
You are right! And thanks for reviewing my commits :)
Indeed, buildFaultHandler is still creating the wrong type of
IdentityDefiner. I thought that all dependencies on the various
IdentityDefiner implementations were removed from OpenEJB thanks to the
introduction of IdentityDefinerBuilder;
Hi,
I am surpised that OrderItem.setOrder_orderId gives an error. Could you
please provide the stack trace (the TranQL part + the first OpenEJB
element) along with the DDs?
FWIW, there are a couple of integration tests for CMP and CMR overlap
scenarios in the OpenEJB tree:
sub-project:
Hi Manu,
Once again, thanks for your debugging!
I had a look to the DD and I have identified why the itests showing this
specifc case are working for us and not for you: basically in our test,
we have a OTM relationship between a CMP with a simple PK on the
one-side and a CMP with a compound
Hi Manu,
I think that a new accessor for this specific case is a good idea. The
set method is exactly what it should be. Though, I think that we should
drop the pkClass.isIntance test: this set method is always invoked with
a CMP value, which is the unique field defined by the compound PK
Hello Rakesh,
It is definitively useful. Dain has already created a JIRA for this
issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1133. To contribute
your custom PrimaryKeyGenerator, you need to attach to this JIRA your
implementation and select the Grant license to ASF... radio button.
+1 Release 1.0
Gianny
Sachin Patel wrote:
forwarding this on behalf of Matt...
- sachin
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Date: *January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM EST
*To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject: **[Fwd:
Hi Manu,
You are once again correct: let's remove this read-only decorator - this
was a very bad idea - at least if the field is a PK one. This read only
behavior was intended to prevent developers from changing a relationship
to a CMP having a coumpond PK with multiple fields. Indeed, in
and
CMRMappedToOwningPKCMP.
I think that the first thing to do is to add support for your very first
scenario. I think that this is more or less that code snippet that you
have submitted a couple of days ago.
Thanks,
Gianny
Thanks
Manu
On 1/7/06, *Gianny Damour* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
More question if you don't mind.
2.) Assuming sombody wants to do session replication (All
Active) instead of (one Active and n backups) is there provision
within the WADI api to plug in this stratergy?
I'm giving this some thought in terms of SFSB support, I'm
+1 Confluence
Gianny
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at
Hi,
In this situation, I think that you should try:
maven -U clean install
-U means that newer versions of plugins should be checked from the
plugin repositories.
Thanks,
Gianny
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Got the following error trying to build geronimo-spec-javamail. Help
Hi Jason,
This has now been fixed. XidFactory is now being properly injected and G
should start fine.
Thanks,
Gianny
Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm not sure how I got G into this state, but its barfing on boot with:
snip
Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_09)...
Started configuration 1/16
1 - 100 of 665 matches
Mail list logo