Bad web fault managment

Hi folks, I've been working with David BLEVINS as an OpenEJB developer. I'm a beginner with Apache Geronimo, and I'd like to know what is the link between Apache OpenEJB and Apache Geronimo. Actually, i did some enhancements in the web service part of Apache OpenEJB, and i can see some of them

Re: Apache OpenEJB and Apache Geronimo

, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hi folks, I've been working with David B. in Apache OpenEJB. I'm a beginner with Apache Geronimo and i'd like to get inputs regarding the OpenEJB/Geronimo link. Actually, i did some bug fixes/enhancements in OpenEJB. Some of them has been pushed to Geronimo

Re: Unable to build Geronimo from sources

Hi all, Sorry for the late answer. [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. Please refer to

Re: Unable to build Geronimo from sources

Hi again, using mvn clean install -DskipTests looks better but now, i'm getting another error. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] could not

Re: error when building geronime on wondows

Hi, I also got that error some days ago. The trick is to add the system property -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 to your maven command line. Don't forget to increase your memory. Under Cygwin (Windoze), I use -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=64m Hope it helps. Jean-Louis 2011/2/9

Re: Release Connector/Transaction components

Hi devs, any news on the availability? Thanks Jean-Louis 2011/7/7 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com I'm still not sure about the instructions, but releasing from the 2.2 branch should be fine. I only want to review the trunk code. also, replying to a different message, if you run

Fwd: EntityManager not closed when a stateful is destroyed

FYI If something fails in Geronimo, please lemme know. Jean-Louis -- Forwarded message -- From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com Date: 2011/7/12 Subject: Re: EntityManager not closed when a stateful is destroyed To: d...@openejb.apache.org OK, reverted changes yesterday

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Transaction Manager version 2.2.2

Thanks a lot Jacek Oups, here is my +1. Jean-Louis 2011/7/19 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com +1 On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, Note: This is my first release ever so provide guidance where needed. The release of Geronimo Transaction Manager version

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Geronimo Transaction Manager version 2.2.2

Cool! Thanks Jacek. 2011/7/25 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl Thanks for voting. The vote passed with 7 +1's. Kevan Miller Ivan Xu David Blevins Jean-Louis MONTEIRO Shawn Jiang Viola Lu Jacek Laskowski there's no +0 or -1 I'm pushing (releasing) the staging artifacts to central

Re: Have a new release for OpenEJB 3.0.4 ?

Hi Ivan, no problem for me. Go ahead. Jean-Louis 2011/9/20 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com Suppose no one has objection for the propose :-), I will do the release work for OpenEJB 3.0.4 tomorrow. 2011/9/20 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com Hi, OpenEJB devs, Geronimo hopes to have a maintenance build 2.1.8,

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Geronimo v3.0-beta-1 Released!

Congrats everyone. Well done. Jean-Louis 2011/11/16 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com Great work everyone! There's also been a press release from the ASF. --kevan On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Rex Wang wrote: The Apache Geronimo project is very glad to announce the release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)

Great. Thank you guys. Jean-Louis Le 16 avril 2012 22:02, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Ok, closing vote with 5 +1s and no other votes. +1s: Forrest Xia David Blevins Kevan Miller Alan Cabrera Shawn Jiang -David On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Mark Struberg as a new Geronimo committer

Due? Overdue? Anyway, Congrats Mark. Jean louis Le 7 déc. 2012 18:12, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit : Hi folks! Thanks for the honour of letting me join your effort! I'll mainly be active in maintaining the CDI related spec packages for now. txs and LieGrue, strub -

Re: XBean Release?

+1, we are waiting for it Thanks Kevan. 2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in seeing a release… --kevan -- Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

Thx Mark 2013/3/7 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13. The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis): https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/ SVN source tag for genesis:

Re: Java EE 7 API jars

Hi Kevan, Maybe I could help on EJB 3.2 part. Jean-Louis 2013/4/17 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Sutter kwsut...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the API jar files for Java EE 7

Re: Java EE 7 API jars

Hi Kevan, Yes, if someone could create a new branch that'd be great thought I don't plan to work on a lot next week. Kevin already created all JIRAs so I just need to submit patches. Regards, Jean-Louis 2013/4/18 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com On Apr 18, 2013, at 1:40 AM, Jean-Louis

Re: Java EE 7 API jars

Thanks Kevan. Checkout done and build ok as well. Will try to push a first patch by end of next week. Jean-Louis 2013/4/19 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kevan, Yes, if someone could create a new

Re: update dependencies?

Hi Kevan, Just in case it's needed, I just wanted to mention the latest OpenEJB release is 4.5.2. The 4.6.0 (trunk) will be out soon hopefully. Jean-Louis 2013/4/23 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com I see there is a new OpenJPA release. I also noticed that our OpenEJB depencency is

Re: asm4 in xbean

Out of curiosity, what are the objectives of such a change? I mean, is there any important improvments on ASM4 we cannot miss? Is ASM 3 end of life? Jean-Louis 2013/5/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! A small discussion which popped up on IRC regarding asm4: Preclusion: ASM3 and

Re: Would like to contribute

Hi, Kevan was asking your JIRA ID to assign you to those JIRAs. The JIRA ID is the one you use to connect to issues.a.o Thanks, Jean-Louis 2013/6/10 Andrew McCright and...@us.ibm.com Hi Kevan, Thanks! The JIRA IDs that I am interested in are: 6450 - Concurrency Utils 6452 - JAX-RS 2.0

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

Go ahead and thanks Le 4 nov. 2013 03:21, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? -David

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 thanks 2013/11/8 Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com +1 On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, release rolled! Binaries: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ Tag:

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

indeed, it should. JLouis 2013/11/26 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

+1 Thanks guys 2013/11/26 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Signature are available here https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog:

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.17

Great step to Java 8 Thanks Romain +1 2014-04-01 8:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 txs Romain! LieGrue, strub On Monday, 31 March 2014, 21:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: +1 (non binding) Thanks a lot ! Regards JB On 03/31/2014 09:54 PM,

Re: Unsubscribe

Hi Arnab, You should send an email to dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apache.org if you wanna unsubscribe. JLouis 2014-05-20 23:04 GMT-07:00 Arnab Karmakar arna...@gmail.com: Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 On May 20, 2014 11:39 PM, Alex Rasmussen a...@danicon.dk wrote: unsubscribe --

Re: unsubscribe

Hi Alex, You should send an email to dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apache.org instead if you want to unsubscribe. Jean-Louis 2014-05-20 22:38 GMT-07:00 Alex Rasmussen a...@danicon.dk: unsubscribe -- Jean-Louis

Re:

Send an email to dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apache.org if you want to unsubscribe 2014-05-20 22:49 GMT-07:00 hobbyhebin hobbyhe...@gmail.com: unsubscribe -- hobbyhebin -- Jean-Louis

Re: Google Analytics

Yep I see the OpenEJB website and a google message to update to *Universal Analytics* JLouis 2014-05-26 23:21 GMT+02:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Anyone still able to access this? For some reason this no longer shows up in my Google Analytics account. On Wed, May 14, 2008

Re: Google Analytics

Then no. I can only see OpenEJB. JLouis 2014-05-28 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Was specifically referring to the geronimo.apache.org website. Seems these stats are no longer accessible. -David On May 26, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano

Re: [VOTE] geronimo javamail 1.8.4

Looks great Romain. Thanks. +1 (non-binding) 2014-07-22 19:42 GMT+02:00 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Is your PGP key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS? I can’t get the signatures to

Re: removing async annotation finder

nope, it was a workaround more than a feature, but I agree it's time to dig into the real problem. 2014-08-08 14:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi guys I implemented async annotation finder some times ago mainly to avoid to enable whole feature directly but now on

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] a few spec alpha-1 versions

Hey Mark, JSON is still on 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to also include this one, isn't it? Thanks anyway. Waiting for the new repo. JLouis 2014-08-31 21:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Oki, txs for review, will fix that and redo the. Wonder why RAT did not find it? Looks

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] a few spec alpha-1 versions

Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-09-01 10:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: Hey Mark, JSON is still on 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to also include this one, isn't it? Thanks anyway. Waiting for the new repo. JLouis 2014-08-31 21:51 GMT+02:00 Mark

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] a few spec alpha-1 versions

for example). JLouis 2014-09-01 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: who is this guy to release, LOL 2014-09-01 10:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 forgot about it but we can release johnzon then Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6529) JSON 1.0 spec - bad scm info and no RAT plugin

Jean-Louis MONTEIRO created GERONIMO-6529: - Summary: JSON 1.0 spec - bad scm info and no RAT plugin Key: GERONIMO-6529 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6529 Project

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6529) JSON 1.0 spec - bad scm info and no RAT plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated GERONIMO-6529: -- Attachment: rat-svm.patch Small patch to fix SCM information and also to add

JSON spec API patch

Hey guys, Just checked the JSON spec project. Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6529 Thanks -- Jean-Louis

Re: [DISCUSS] release XBean-4.1?

Cool! 2014-10-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 for me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-17 8:42 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! As you

Re: [VOTE] release Geronimo XBean-4.1

I guess 2014-10-19 19:17 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: So is this vote officially canceled? Regards, Alan On Oct 19, 2014, at 3:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Of course, if this has the same limitation then just go on and fix it the same way.

Re: JEE6 TCKs

, like Java EE, you must pay to get them and use them. As an apache committer, you can access under certain conditions (CLA + NDA) some of the private TCKs (Oracle provided to Apache for a couple of projects). Hope it helps. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http

Re: CDI spec jar release

and we tweaked a few minor things to pass the sig test for the CDI-1.2 spec. Which other fix do you have in mind? LieGrue, strub Am 01.04.2015 um 23:23 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: Hi Mark, Did I miss something? Did you release and send a vote for the fix of last

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-interceptor-1.2 spec API

+1 JLouis Le mer. 1 avr. 2015 à 18:41, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com a écrit : +1 Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-interceptor-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements

CDI spec jar release

Hi Mark, Did I miss something? Did you release and send a vote for the fix of last week? Thanks JLouis

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation-1.2 spec API

+1 JLouis Le mer. 1 avr. 2015 à 18:42, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com a écrit : +1 Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-annotation-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements

Re: [VOTE] Reease Transaction Manager 3.1.3

+1 Le mer. 10 juin 2015 à 07:35, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net a écrit : +1 (non binding) Regards JB On 06/09/2015 09:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a 3.1.3 release of the transactionmanager component at

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean-4.3

Looks good thanks. Also checked the LICENSE and NOTICE, and they are now correct. The LICENSE contains [] in the license for Apache ASLv2, but it's not a stopper in my opinion. +1 Le lun. 1 juin 2015 à 02:27, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: xbean-asm5-shaded notice and license

Yes, license and notice should be in. +1 Le mer. 27 mai 2015 à 21:08, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.5 release

Looks good so far +1 Le dim. 29 nov. 2015 à 00:11, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Up, changes are minor compared to last release. Should be fast to review > guys. > Le 23 nov. 2015 11:51, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a > écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Please VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jsonp_1.1 API.jar

+1 Le mar. 18 avr. 2017 à 14:52, Reinhard Sandtner a écrit : > +1 nonbinding > > lg > reini > > > Am 17.04.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > > > Hi! > > > > Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONP 1.1 API. > > > > The staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

+1 Thanks Le ven. 28 juil. 2017 à 13:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 (for the release and the src zip in dist) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

> Do you as EJB EG member have more information on that? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 27.06.2017 um 14:55 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>: > > > > I agree. If you could fixing the OSGi issues that'd be great. > > > &g

Re: are we d'accord to retire the Geronimo Server part?

I think we came to an agreement so far Le mar. 25 avr. 2017 à 00:21, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Or do we need another formal vote? > > If we are all on the same boat, when, how and who is drafting the > Announcement? > > LieGrue, > strub > >

Re: [VOTE] fold the various Geronimo subproject mailing lists to the main lists

+1 too Let's make Geronimo the common EE project as it's been discussed. Le ven. 21 avr. 2017 à 07:25, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi Alan! > > Thanks for the feedback! > > ad user@ > > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is > due to the lack of

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

Thanks Mark +1 Le ven. 21 avr. 2017 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > saw that in repo staging tab but thought my eyes were tired, thanks for > confirming it is not yet the case :) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jaxrs_2.0 API jar

+1 Le lun. 24 avr. 2017 à 01:52, Reinhard Sandtner a écrit : > +1 (nonbinding) > > lg > reini > > Am 17.04.2017 um 08:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-annotation_1.3 spec jar

+1 Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 09:53, Reinhard Sandtner a écrit : > +1 > > > Am 26.06.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on our version of common-annoations 1.3. > > We need this for CDI-2.0. The only

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

Awesome +1 Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 11:16, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in > version 1.0 > This is the API for CDI-2.0. The artifact does pass the CDI TCK and is > binary compatible with the official

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

I agree. If you could fixing the OSGi issues that'd be great. In addition to OWB, Meecrowave could also benefit from it. BTW, if we could check and validate the transaction spec, that'd be fantastic. Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 14:38, Mark Struberg a écrit : > txs and ping :D >

Re: xbean java 9 state

Hey Romain. Thanks for the update. I'd be happy to help at any time this week. Jean Louis Le sam. 4 nov. 2017 à 19:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I plan to check if we can merge module-info properly for our shades on > trunk of xbean then I think we are

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.6 release

+1 Le mer. 22 nov. 2017 à 10:18, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > +1 > > 2017-11-20 9:12 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > >> Hi, >> >> As mentionned weeks ago now, I'd like to call a VOTE for the release >> of Apache XBean-4.6. The major changes is the

Re: [VOTE] JAX-RS 2.1 spec jar release

+1 JLouis Le jeu. 21 déc. 2017 à 11:44, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Forgot: my own +1 ;) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github >

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.8 release

Is this vote closed Romain? It looks good to me but not sure if I'm too late or not. Le lun. 16 avr. 2018 à 18:01, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > +1 > > 2018-04-15 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE for the release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 thanks Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le dim. 10 juin 2018 17:43, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Hi folks! >> >> take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release >> staging repo is at >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 11:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the tck > setup. > > > > The dist (dev) area is available at

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 20:24, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Here we are with the roll #2 of the geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 vote. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 27434) > The staging repo is: >

Can't close a PR on geronimo-config

Hi, I have applied the PR/2 from Daniel Soro to SVN, but I can't close it. Usually when Github is the mirror and we merge a PR manually, gitbot sees it and closes the PR for us. Did I miss something? Jean-Louis

Re: Release config?

Config was the last spec to use javax namespace Le mar. 29 mai 2018 à 14:36, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Yes, javax.config is the official namespace for JSR-382. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 29.05.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Are the api 1-1? If so lets merge the src

Re: Move Geronimo MP Config from SVN to GITBOX

gt; > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4898f1bbd990dd94554bbf20ff569cdbb9ae3c0a23e88e5e2f2c233e@%3Cdev.geronimo.apache.org%3E > > > > On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Applying patches submitted to github is a p

[MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

Hi, Eclipse MP-JWT is out, so I have created a PR to use the latest available release. Before I push to Apache, can some one quickly review? Also, right after, I'd like to do a release for it. Thoughts? Jean-Louis

Move Geronimo MP Config from SVN to GITBOX

Hi, Applying patches submitted to github is a pain. Of course, it's doable, but it adds delays and extra steps we could avoid. For instance, I have checked out the PR from Dany. Need to create a diff file. Then need to checkout the SVN tree, and apply the diff file and commit. We could have

Re: Release config?

codebase > please > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > Le sam. 2 juin 2018 à 03:31, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > > > > Config was the last spec to use javax namespace > > > > Le mar. 29 mai 201

Re: [GitHub] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse Microprofile 1.1 and minor things

It has been removed from the 1.1 TCK so removed it as well so we know what we are passing Le samedi 2 juin 2018, GitBox a écrit : > rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse > Microprofile 1.1 and minor things > URL:

Re: [GitHub] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse Microprofile 1.1 and minor things

Did I miss something or is it replacing a string with the same string? Le samedi 2 juin 2018, GitBox a écrit : > rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse > Microprofile 1.1 and minor things > URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2# >

Re: [MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

Can we redo the release with the final version of the TCK Yes it passes locally. Le samedi 2 juin 2018, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > If tck pass just push to asf > > For the release, it is pending, waiting for some votes > > Le sam. 2 juin 2018 17:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a &g

Re: Release config?

2 juin 2018 17:17, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > >> Currently we try to keep the 2 aligned but it won't be sustainable and it >> does not make sense either. >> As the config spec is going to be released as part of the next Jakarta EE >> I hope, we woul

Re: Move Geronimo MP Config from SVN to GITBOX

e canonical source when >> we do a SVN to git migration and there's already a git mirror in place. >> >> Do we want to wait for after the coming release to do the conversion? >> >> John >> >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:54 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >> wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

d Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:

Microprofile APIs

Hi again, I have noticed that some MP implementations in Geronimo have APIs duplicated (JWT for instance) some other not (Config for instance). I have quickly chatted with Romain, he told me that's because of the OSGI integration mainly. Was wondering if instead of duplicating, we could maybe

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. Looks good to me, but I believe we need to decide about the API stuff before. It is definitely not a bind copy of the sources, as I checked it. But the signatures and the packages are obviously the same. Le dim. 3 juin 2018 à 22:49, Romain

Re: Microprofile APIs

ation-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 08:56, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > >> Hi again, >> >> I have noticed that some MP implementations in Geronimo have APIs >> duplicated (JWT for instance) some other not (Confi

Re: Can't close a PR on geronimo-config

e good. > > John > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 8:07 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have applied the PR/2 from Daniel Soro to SVN, but I can't close it. >> Usually when Github is the mirror and we merge a PR manually, gitbot sees >> it and closes the PR for us. >> >> Did I miss something? >> >> Jean-Louis >> >

Microprofile 1.3

Hi, Microprofile 1.3 is almost out. Config and JWT are up to date with the last release. Where are we with the rest? Does it make sense to release them all for Microprofile 1.3 and then we can move master to the next versions for Microprofile 1.4. What do you think? Jean-Louis

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

au.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:55, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a &

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

ok then +1 if as we discussed, we will try to push a PR to Eclipse so we can yank the APIs from our repos Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > >> I have checked with the 1.1 release and it p

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

I think so. Mistake maybe Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 14:28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Ok, > > seems it comes from the PR apply of > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/commit/c2be10837190eb8ab30da6f491979cc54e445243 > > can it be reverted please (just the version)? > > > Romain

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

If I forget, just ping me in the morning Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 00:11, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > I can do tomorrow if you want > > > Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 20:25, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> Oki, do you revert it (or i can do it tomorrow)? >> >

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

I can do tomorrow if you want Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 20:25, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Oki, do you revert it (or i can do it tomorrow)? > > Le mer. 6 juin 2018 19:51, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > >> I think so. Mistake maybe >> >> Le mer. 6 juin

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 01:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 > > Tested on Karzf > Thanks > Regards > JB > Le 27 juin 2018, à 21:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without >> bytecode workaround. Here is the

Re: Mp health?

Hey Romain, Yes indeed, it's missing. I'm happy to help but not possible in the next 2 weeks probably JLouis Le dim. 24 juin 2018 à 09:19, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I will continue openapi spec impl very soon but thanks to a recent thread > i realized health still needs to

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

LinkedIn | Book >>> > >>> > >>> > Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 13:34, John D. Ament a >>> écrit : >>> > I'll go with a +1 if you're going to raise the PR upstream to fix the >>> eclipse JAR >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jun

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

Hi Mark, sounds like a good idea. Happy to help if you wish JLouis Le jeu. 26 oct. 2017 à 21:46, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > The EG started working on JSR-382. > It seems that it will be based on the MicroProfile work. > We did just rename a few things back to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Safeguard 1.0

I somehow missed this project so I just discovered it this morning. That is a great addition at Apache. Thanks guys. Great job and big +1 of course Le dim. 7 janv. 2018 à 16:21, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le 6 janv. 2018 19:15, "John D. Ament"

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Config 1.1

+1 Le mar. 2 janv. 2018 à 19:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 > > Le 2 janv. 2018 18:57, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> I have the kids tonight so as soon as they are in bed, I'll have a loo

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Config 1.1

I have the kids tonight so as soon as they are in bed, I'll have a look ;-) Le mar. 2 janv. 2018 à 15:06, John D. Ament a écrit : > All, > > This is a call to vote on the Geronimo Config 1.1 release. it implements > the MicroProfile Config API v1.2. > > Release notes can

Populate MP implementations

Hi, Looks like this page is not update to date regarding what we have at the minute and what we are working on. https://wiki.eclipse.org/MicroProfile/Implementation Are we ok if I send a message to get it updated? Jean-Louis

Re: Populate MP implementations

We are not mentioned as JWT impl at least Le jeu. 21 juin 2018 à 23:28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Sure, no need to ask ;) > > Seems we just have to finish the pending votes, impl openapi and create > health to be complete :) > > Le jeu. 21 juin 2018 22:32, Jean-Louis M

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 Le dim. 29 juil. 2018 à 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28414): >

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.0

+1 Le jeu. 26 juil. 2018 à 20:35, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Up :) > > Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 14:52, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Ray >> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 02:39 Romain Manni-Bucau, >> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> As mentionned on the list I'd like to

  1   2   3   4   >