Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-20 Thread Jason Dillon

Aight its moved...

--jason


On Jul 19, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:


No objections from me.

On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:


I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level  
geronimo dir.  As in:


svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/ 
STATUS http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS


This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not  
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits  
for the 1.2 branch.


I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

 * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only  
bit that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work  
with the change.


I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason







Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Matt Hogstrom

No objections from me.

On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:


I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo  
dir.  As in:


svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS


This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not  
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits  
for the 1.2 branch.


I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

 * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only  
bit that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work  
with the change.


I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason





Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Kevan Miller


On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:


I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo  
dir.  As in:


svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS


This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not  
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits  
for the 1.2 branch.


I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

 * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only  
bit that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work  
with the change.


I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)


Sounds good to me. I seem to recall Ken Coar setting up the automated  
emails...


--kevan


Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet

+1

On 7/19/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo
dir.  As in:

svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS

This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits
for the 1.2 branch.

I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

  * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only bit
that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work with
the change.

I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/


Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Prasad Kashyap

+1

Cheers
Prasad

On 7/19/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo
dir.  As in:

svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS

This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits
for the 1.2 branch.

I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

  * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only bit
that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work with
the change.

I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason



Re: Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Donald Woods



Jason Dillon wrote:

I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo 
dir.  As in:


svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS


This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not just 
for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits for the 
1.2 branch.


I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.



+1


 * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only bit 
that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work with the 
change.


I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Move the STATUS up?

2007-07-19 Thread Jason Dillon

I've mentioned this a few times before...

I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo  
dir.  As in:


svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/STATUS


This file really is the status of the entire Geronimo project, not  
just for the trunk of the server bits, as it already contains bits  
for the 1.2 branch.


I'd like to move this file, unless anyone has any objections.

 * * *

Where is the email of the STATUS file run from?  That is the only bit  
that I'm not sure about that would need to be updated to work with  
the change.


I'd like to do this in the next day or so.  So, speak now... mkay :-)

Cheers,

--jason