Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. I'm +1 on both of these (assuming Alan really has volunteered!). Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
+1 John Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Here is my formal +1. Gianny On 12/09/2006, at 12:24 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
+1 for Dain as pilot and Alan as co-pilot. -David On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
+1 if they don't flake out due to exhaustion :-) thanks david jencks On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
I'm +1 for Dain and Alan taking the lead on this release. Joe Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Slet's not discuss responsibility until we have their buy in :) On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yup, Dain and Alan would be great. Do you guys know what are you actually getting into !? ;-) Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Yup, Dain and Alan would be great. Do you guys know what are you actually getting into !? ;-) Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Dain and Alan would be great. Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Folks, > > Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also > volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or > vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm > starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron > volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his > volunteering. > > Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of > Apache software. > > Matt Hogstrom > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
Given this opportunity, let us excel at troubling Dain and Alan for sometime :o)) VamsiOn 9/11/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Folks,Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has alsovolunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussionor vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaronvolunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on hisvolunteering.Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software.Matt Hogstrom[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
I think it's important that we agree on the release manager. Dain and Alan are more than welcome to take this on as far as I'm concerned. Thanks, Aaron On 9/11/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 Release Manager
I'm +1 Dain goat herding 1.2. I think there is still debate to be had as to the content but having many folks lead releases is a good thing :) On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Folks, Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion or vote on this. I don't know that we have a "policy on this" so I'm starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past Aaron volunteered to do 1.2 as well but I don't recall closure on his volunteering. Also, note that only PMC members have binding votes on the release of Apache software. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
