Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Sounds like good suggestions to make in the 2.1.4 and 2.2 code branches. -Donald Ted Kirby wrote: A comment on release notes: As Jarek suggested earlier, I'd like to change the wording of the System Requirements in the Release Notes from: You need a platform that supports the Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5.0+) or greater. to Java J2SE 1.5.0 or greater, and a platform that supports it. In the README.txt, I'd like to see GEP mentioned, especially in the Application Development section. GEP may also be used to start the server. These changes would be for after 2.1.3. Our SVN seems down now, otherwise I'd make some updates. Comments? Ted On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RC1 has been posted and a Vote started. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
A comment on release notes: As Jarek suggested earlier, I'd like to change the wording of the System Requirements in the Release Notes from: You need a platform that supports the Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5.0+) or greater. to Java J2SE 1.5.0 or greater, and a platform that supports it. In the README.txt, I'd like to see GEP mentioned, especially in the Application Development section. GEP may also be used to start the server. These changes would be for after 2.1.3. Our SVN seems down now, otherwise I'd make some updates. Comments? Ted On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RC1 has been posted and a Vote started. > > > -Donald > > > Donald Woods wrote: >> >> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a >> Geronimo 2.1.3 release. >> >> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html >> >> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on >> the Security page - >> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html >> >> >> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's >> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. >> >> >> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 >> before we cut the branch and start the release process? >> >> >> >> -Donald >
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
RC1 has been posted and a Vote started. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Here is what is done as of Rev693682 which will be used to create RC1: - branches/2.1.3 updated to version=2.1.3 - mvn rat:check run on source and generated artifacts/assemblies - RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.3 updated - Release Status page udpated - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status - Release notes added to 2.1 Docs - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.3.TXT - Component Versions table in 2.1 Docs updated for 2.1.3 - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/What+changed+in+2.1 I'll start the vote and discuss threads tomorrow morning, as soon as I have all of the artifacts on the staging site. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Hi Donald, Looks like all the big ones that popped up have been dealt with. I'll run the RC through whenever it's ready. Thanks! On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We rolled back to OpenJPA 1.0.3 yesterday, due to TCK failures with the > newer 1.2.0 release. As soon as Jason W. verifies that most of the problems > he was seeing are gone, I'll publish a RC1 for everyone to start looking at. > > > -Donald > > > > Donald Woods wrote: > >> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a >> Geronimo 2.1.3 release. >> >> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html >> >> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on >> the Security page - >> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html >> >> >> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's >> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. >> >> >> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 >> before we cut the branch and start the release process? >> >> >> >> -Donald >> > -- ~Jason Warner
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
We rolled back to OpenJPA 1.0.3 yesterday, due to TCK failures with the newer 1.2.0 release. As soon as Jason W. verifies that most of the problems he was seeing are gone, I'll publish a RC1 for everyone to start looking at. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
I meant geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.6 -Donald Donald Woods wrote: The 2.1.3 release branch has been updated to use the released - geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.4 genesis-1.3.1 -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
The 2.1.3 release branch has been updated to use the released - geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.4 genesis-1.3.1 -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
As listed in the Release Status/Plan for 2.1.3, the release branch has been created at - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.3 The existing branches/2.1 has been updated to be - version=2.1.4-SNAPSHOT If there are any critical user fixes (like connector fail-over or memory leak bugs) you still have until next Tuesday afternoon (3 PM ET) to include them in 2.1.3. Just reply to this thread, so we can discuss any potential release impacts. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
The following prerequisites for the 2.1.3 Server release are currently undergoing release voting - - Javamail_1.4-1.6 http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-javamail-spec-%281.5%29-and-javamail-provider-%281.6%29-tt19212820s134.html - Genesis-1.3.1 http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Genesis-1.3.1-tt19225454s134.html -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
As you mentioned, 2.1.3 is supposed to be security fixes so I guess I won't look at port it back to 2.1.3. I'll look at pull it back to 2.1.x after 2.1.3 is released. Thanks Lin On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes and > update the 2.1 Docs? > Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)? > > > -Donald > > > Lin Sun wrote: >> >> I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet - >> check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such >> as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by >> deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web >> services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example. >> I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3? >> >> Lin >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a >>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release. >>> >>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html >>> >>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on >>> the >>> Security page - >>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html >>> >>> >>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's >>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. >>> >>> >>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 >>> before >>> we cut the branch and start the release process? >>> >>> >>> >>> -Donald >>> >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
On second thought, lets not include this in 2.1.3, since it should be focused on getting security fixes out ASAP. But, I would be for including it in the 2.1.4-SNAPSHOT stream. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes and update the 2.1 Docs? Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)? -Donald Lin Sun wrote: I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet - check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example. I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3? Lin On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Actually, the sooner the better, since 2.1.3 should be focused on getting security fixes out ASAP. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Cool! We could wait till next week to spin a release if you're expecting more JIRAs to fix in the next few days -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release... Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out for a vote by end of day tomorrow. Rick http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version. Rick -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Cool! We could wait till next week to spin a release if you're expecting more JIRAs to fix in the next few days -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release... Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out for a vote by end of day tomorrow. Rick http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version. Rick -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Donald Woods wrote: Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release... Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out for a vote by end of day tomorrow. Rick http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version. Rick -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Yep, just realized that this morning. Thanks for the reminder to add it to the Release Status page. -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: Donald, I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1 (alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck runs. Joe Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release... http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version. Rick -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes and update the 2.1 Docs? Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)? -Donald Lin Sun wrote: I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet - check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example. I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3? Lin On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Donald, I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1 (alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck runs. Joe Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Donald Woods wrote: OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version. Rick -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
OK, I included G4271 on the Release Status page. -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Right, I think it's important to get these in given that we'd like to release samples based on Geronimo 2.1.2 and ideally they should also run on 2.1.3. This might also let us run other plugins that have previously been released. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail snapshots. When can you start cutting the Javamail release? -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet - check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example. I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3? Lin On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a > Geronimo 2.1.3 release. > > Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html > > Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the > Security page - > http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html > > > The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's > "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. > > > Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before > we cut the branch and start the release process? > > > > -Donald >
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Right, I think it's important to get these in given that we'd like to release samples based on Geronimo 2.1.2 and ideally they should also run on 2.1.3. This might also let us run other plugins that have previously been released. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Donald Woods wrote: Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release. Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the Security page - http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process? There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider picking up. Rick -Donald
