Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Donald Woods]

I didn't want to tie the J2G releases to the WTP server adaptor releases for 
now, but we could in the future if there is more synergy between them and 
users start asking for it...  For now, placing J2G in the same update site as 
the WTP plugins should be enough for most users.


-Donald

Lin Sun wrote:

Donald, thanks for doing all these!

Are you thinking of releasing this separately from the Geronimo Eclipse 
plugin?  Might be good to release together when Eclipse plugin releases 
its next maintenance release (if it comes out soon) and also allow users 
to download j2g using Eclipse update manager.


Lin

Donald Woods wrote:

J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk

I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use 
and the initial release target should be 1.0.0.


I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the released Eclipse 
v3.3 level and remove a few snapshots, so we can create a branch copy 
for a 1.0.0 release.  That way, we can create an official release of 
the tool and start getting user feedback for future releases.



-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to 
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so 
we can start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as 
the code is already in our svn repo?



-Donald






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

Roger, will do.


On 9/21/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into
> the main web site
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
> > J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk
> >
> > I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use and
> > the initial release target should be 1.0.0.
> >
> > I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the released Eclipse
> > v3.3 level and remove a few snapshots, so we can create a branch copy
> > for a 1.0.0 release.  That way, we can create an official release of the
> > tool and start getting user feedback for future releases.
> >
> >
> > -Donald
> >
> > Donald Woods wrote:
> >> Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
> >> move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so
> >> we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
> >>
> >> Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as
> >> the code is already in our svn repo?
> >>
> >>
> >> -Donald
>



-- 
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Hernan Cunico]

Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into the main web site 


Cheers!
Hernan

Donald Woods wrote:

J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk

I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use and 
the initial release target should be 1.0.0.


I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the released Eclipse 
v3.3 level and remove a few snapshots, so we can create a branch copy 
for a 1.0.0 release.  That way, we can create an official release of the 
tool and start getting user feedback for future releases.



-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to 
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so 
we can start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as 
the code is already in our svn repo?



-Donald

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Lin Sun]

Donald, thanks for doing all these!

Are you thinking of releasing this separately from the Geronimo Eclipse 
plugin?  Might be good to release together when Eclipse plugin releases 
its next maintenance release (if it comes out soon) and also allow users 
to download j2g using Eclipse update manager.


Lin

Donald Woods wrote:

J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk

I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use and 
the initial release target should be 1.0.0.


I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the released Eclipse 
v3.3 level and remove a few snapshots, so we can create a branch copy 
for a 1.0.0 release.  That way, we can create an official release of the 
tool and start getting user feedback for future releases.



-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to 
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so 
we can start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as 
the code is already in our svn repo?



-Donald

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Donald Woods]

J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk

I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use and the 
initial release target should be 1.0.0.


I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the released Eclipse v3.3 
level and remove a few snapshots, so we can create a branch copy for a 1.0.0 
release.  That way, we can create an official release of the tool and start 
getting user feedback for future releases.



-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move 
the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can 
start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as 
the code is already in our svn repo?



-Donald


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Hernan Cunico]

would any of these samples work for further testing?

http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html

Cheers!
Hernan

Erik B. Craig wrote:

Lin,



On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two immediate
questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:

1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?


The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the 2.0.1 release 

2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans? 



As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in assuming 
you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to the Java 
EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does. 


If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been used to
test
the tool, that would be great!


The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source 
identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan generation.



I hope this answers your questions.
--
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Hernan Cunico]

speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been using maven 2 for those apps? 
If so, have you used any template?


The reason I'm asking is because with Prasad and Viet we've been trying to 
figure out a way to consolidate all the sample applications as well as 
providing some templates to somewhat standardize and facilitate the development 
of sample apps. A couple of days ago a user asked for where are the samples in 
svn referring to those from the wiki.

Do you think that any of those samples could be updated if needed so then can 
be placed somewhere in svn?

Cheers!
Hernan

Erik B. Craig wrote:

Haha, yes, 'interesting' is certainly one way to put it =P
The ones that are in the 2.0 wiki should be quite a bit better though, 
since we've (Viet and myself) have been collaborating on getting them 
cleaned up and making sure they work on jboss and geronimo alike, as 
well as having accurate documentation.


On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:



...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless ...


C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-)

Cheers!
Hernan

Erik B. Craig wrote:
 > Yes, they would, actually...
 >
 > I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps,
 > although it was with the versions that are present in the
Geronimo 1.1
 > wiki pages, not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
 > J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the
 > migration applications at the time weren't flawless out of the box
 > anyway, so there were some definite issues.. although they were
the same
 > issues present if you were to completely manually step through the
 > migration as per the documentation. As a result of this, Daytrader
 > proved itself a much more viable application to test against...
which is
 > why I had only mentioned it in my previous post.
 >
 > The current migration samples on the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages
should work
 > as advertised through J2G though, keeping in mind that the tool will
 > only point out issues in actual source code and database
references and
 > the actions must be manually completed at the discretion of the user.
 >
 > On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 > >> wrote:
 >
 > would any of these samples work for further testing?
 >
 >
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html

 >
 > Cheers!
 > Hernan
 >
 > Erik B. Craig wrote:
 >  > Lin,
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 > >
 >  > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   >
 >  > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the
wiki.  Two
 > immediate
 >  > questions come up and I hope someone can help
answering them:
 >  >
 >  > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0
or 2.0.1?
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the
 > 2.0.1 release
 >  >
 >  > 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I
correct in
 > assuming
 >  > you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to
 > the Java
 >  > EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.
 >  >
 >  > If someone can point me to the samples tests that have
been
 > used to
 >  > test
 >  > the tool, that would be great!
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source
 >  > identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan
generation.
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > I hope this answers your questions.
 >  > --
 >  > Erik B. Craig
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > Erik B. Craig




--
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

Yes, they would, actually...

I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps, although
it was with the versions that are present in the Geronimo 1.1 wiki pages,
not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the migration
applications at the time weren't flawless out of the box anyway, so there
were some definite issues.. although they were the same issues present if
you were to completely manually step through the migration as per the
documentation. As a result of this, Daytrader proved itself a much more
viable application to test against... which is why I had only mentioned it
in my previous post.

The current migration samples on the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages should work as
advertised through J2G though, keeping in mind that the tool will only point
out issues in actual source code and database references and the actions
must be manually completed at the discretion of the user.

On 9/19/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> would any of these samples work for further testing?
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Erik B. Craig wrote:
> > Lin,
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two
> immediate
> > questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
> >
> > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?
> >
> >
> > The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the 2.0.1release
> >
> > 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
> >
> >
> > As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in assuming
> > you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to the Java
> > EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.
> >
> > If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been used to
> > test
> > the tool, that would be great!
> >
> >
> > The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source
> > identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan generation.
> >
> >
> > I hope this answers your questions.
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
>



-- 
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

On 9/19/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been
> using maven 2 for those apps?
> If so, have you used any template?


Nope, I have left them as-is for compilation/packaging. All of the ones I
have personally touched have been using ant still.

The reason I'm asking is because with Prasad and Viet we've been trying to
> figure out a way to consolidate all the sample applications as well as
> providing some templates to somewhat standardize and facilitate the
> development of sample apps. A couple of days ago a user asked for where are
> the samples in svn referring to those from the wiki.


I did discuss some of this with Viet as well, and my focus has been on
simply getting them working, with moving them to maven/standardizing
afterwards.

Do you think that any of those samples could be updated if needed so then
> can be placed somewhere in svn?


We definitely could with the functional (read: existing) 2.0 ones, if it's
alright that they're still using ant... Would it perhaps be better to get
them standardized and moved over to maven first? Anyway, this discussion
would probably need it's own thread

Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Erik B. Craig wrote:
> > Haha, yes, 'interesting' is certainly one way to put it =P
> > The ones that are in the 2.0 wiki should be quite a bit better though,
> > since we've (Viet and myself) have been collaborating on getting them
> > cleaned up and making sure they work on jboss and geronimo alike, as
> > well as having accurate documentation.
> >
> > On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > 
> > ...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless
> ...
> > 
> >
> > C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-)
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Hernan
> >
> > Erik B. Craig wrote:
> >  > Yes, they would, actually...
> >  >
> >  > I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration
> apps,
> >  > although it was with the versions that are present in the
> > Geronimo 1.1
> >  > wiki pages, not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
> >  > J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the
> >  > migration applications at the time weren't flawless out of the
> box
> >  > anyway, so there were some definite issues.. although they were
> > the same
> >  > issues present if you were to completely manually step through
> the
> >  > migration as per the documentation. As a result of this,
> Daytrader
> >  > proved itself a much more viable application to test against...
> > which is
> >  > why I had only mentioned it in my previous post.
> >  >
> >  > The current migration samples on the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages
> > should work
> >  > as advertised through J2G though, keeping in mind that the tool
> will
> >  > only point out issues in actual source code and database
> > references and
> >  > the actions must be manually completed at the discretion of the
> user.
> >  >
> >  > On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >  > >> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > would any of these samples work for further testing?
> >  >
> >  >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
> >  >
> >  > Cheers!
> >  > Hernan
> >  >
> >  > Erik B. Craig wrote:
> >  >  > Lin,
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >  > >
> >  >  >  >   >  >  >  >
> >  >  > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the
> > wiki.  Two
> >  > immediate
> >  >  > questions come up and I hope someone can help
> > answering them:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0
> > or 2.0.1?
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  > The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as
> the
> >  > 2.0.1 release
> >  >  >
> >  >  > 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  > As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I
> > correct in
> >  > assuming
> >  >  > you are asking whether it supports the newer features
> added to
> >  > the Java
> >  >  > EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > If someone can point me to the samples tests that have
> > been
> >  > used to
> >  >  > test
> >  >  

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

Haha, yes, 'interesting' is certainly one way to put it =P
The ones that are in the 2.0 wiki should be quite a bit better though, since
we've (Viet and myself) have been collaborating on getting them cleaned up
and making sure they work on jboss and geronimo alike, as well as having
accurate documentation.

On 9/19/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> ...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless ...
> 
>
> C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-)
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Erik B. Craig wrote:
> > Yes, they would, actually...
> >
> > I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps,
> > although it was with the versions that are present in the Geronimo 1.1
> > wiki pages, not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
> > J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the
> > migration applications at the time weren't flawless out of the box
> > anyway, so there were some definite issues.. although they were the same
> > issues present if you were to completely manually step through the
> > migration as per the documentation. As a result of this, Daytrader
> > proved itself a much more viable application to test against... which is
> > why I had only mentioned it in my previous post.
> >
> > The current migration samples on the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages should work
> > as advertised through J2G though, keeping in mind that the tool will
> > only point out issues in actual source code and database references and
> > the actions must be manually completed at the discretion of the user.
> >
> > On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > would any of these samples work for further testing?
> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Hernan
> >
> > Erik B. Craig wrote:
> >  > Lin,
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >  > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two
> > immediate
> >  > questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
> >  >
> >  > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or
> 2.0.1?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the
> > 2.0.1 release
> >  >
> >  > 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in
> > assuming
> >  > you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to
> > the Java
> >  > EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.
> >  >
> >  > If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been
> > used to
> >  > test
> >  > the tool, that would be great!
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source
> >  > identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan
> generation.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > I hope this answers your questions.
> >  > --
> >  > Erik B. Craig
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
>



-- 
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Lin Sun]

Erik,

Thanks for your answer.  I thought it did support 2.0, but wanted to be 
sure.   I guess we just need to mention that in the wiki (at the end it 
said the application should be able to be deployed in a running instance 
of Geronimo 1.1.1 without issue).


I'll let u know if I have more questions, once I start to look into more.

Lin

Erik B. Craig wrote:

Lin,



On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two immediate
questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:

1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?


The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the 2.0.1 release 

2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans? 



As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in assuming 
you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to the Java 
EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does. 


If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been used to
test
the tool, that would be great!


The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source 
identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan generation.



I hope this answers your questions.
--
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Hernan Cunico]

...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless ...


C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-)

Cheers!
Hernan

Erik B. Craig wrote:

Yes, they would, actually...

I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps, 
although it was with the versions that are present in the Geronimo 1.1 
wiki pages, not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the 
migration applications at the time weren't flawless out of the box 
anyway, so there were some definite issues.. although they were the same 
issues present if you were to completely manually step through the 
migration as per the documentation. As a result of this, Daytrader 
proved itself a much more viable application to test against... which is 
why I had only mentioned it in my previous post.


The current migration samples on the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages should work 
as advertised through J2G though, keeping in mind that the tool will 
only point out issues in actual source code and database references and 
the actions must be manually completed at the discretion of the user.


On 9/19/07, *Hernan Cunico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


would any of these samples work for further testing?

http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html

Cheers!
Hernan

Erik B. Craig wrote:
 > Lin,
 >
 >
 >
 > On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
 >
 > I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two
immediate
 > questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
 >
 > 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?
 >
 >
 > The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the
2.0.1 release
 >
 > 2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
 >
 >
 > As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in
assuming
 > you are asking whether it supports the newer features added to
the Java
 > EE 5 compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.
 >
 > If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been
used to
 > test
 > the tool, that would be great!
 >
 >
 > The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source
 > identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan generation.
 >
 >
 > I hope this answers your questions.
 > --
 > Erik B. Craig




--
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

Lin,



On 9/19/07, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two immediate
> questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
>
> 1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?


The tool supports and was tested against 2.0.x as well as the 2.0.1 release

2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?


As far as migrating Java EE 5 deployment plans, am I correct in assuming you
are asking whether it supports the newer features added to the Java EE 5
compatible plans? In which case, yes it does.

If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been used to test
> the tool, that would be great!


The tool was primarily tested against Daytrader 1.2 for source
identification as well as new geronimo deployment plan generation.


I hope this answers your questions.
-- 
Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Donald Woods]

Yep, I'll move it over.  Just been busy with other things...


-Donald


Jason Warner wrote:
Donald, 

It seems no one is opposed to this idea.  We're you going to make this 
change soon?


Thanks,

Jason Warner

On 9/13/07, *Matt Hogstrom * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.

On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

 > Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
 > move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
 > so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
 >
 > Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here,
 > as the code is already in our svn repo?
 >
 >
 > -Donald




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Lin Sun]

I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki.  Two immediate 
questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:


1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?

2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?

If someone can point me to the samples tests that have been used to test 
the tool, that would be great!


Thanks, Lin

Jason Warner wrote:
Donald, 

It seems no one is opposed to this idea.  We're you going to make this 
change soon?


Thanks,

Jason Warner

On 9/13/07, *Matt Hogstrom * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.

On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

 > Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
 > move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
 > so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
 >
 > Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here,
 > as the code is already in our svn repo?
 >
 >
 > -Donald

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Jason Warner]

Donald,

It seems no one is opposed to this idea.  We're you going to make this
change soon?

Thanks,

Jason Warner

On 9/13/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.
>
> On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> > Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
> > move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
> > so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
> >
> > Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here,
> > as the code is already in our svn repo?
> >
> >
> > -Donald
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Matt Hogstrom]

+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.

On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to  
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,  
so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here,  
as the code is already in our svn repo?



-Donald

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Hernan Cunico]

I think we could mention this tool and include some links to the main website 
on top level pages like *Migrating to Apache Geronimo*, here are some links

http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html

Cheers!
Hernan

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Let's do both "move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to 
devtools/trunk/j2g" and "update the Development Tools section of the 
Geronimo site" at the earliest.


In http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07349.html a 
user was still using some old wiki docs 
(http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/jboss-to-geronimo-jca-migration.html 
) 
for migrating from JBoss to Geronimo. I think it would be a good idea to 
update all related wiki docs (like the one above) with a highlighted 
link at the top pointing to the availability of J2G toolkit.


- Shiva

On 9/12/07, *Erik B. Craig* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


Yes!

I am all for this, especially so we can progress it onto the
Development Tools section of the Geronimo site to make it more
noticeable and easily accessible to people interested in migrating
applications, as right now the only way to download it or even be
aware of it is by digging through our wiki.


On 9/12/07, *Donald Woods* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like
to move the
current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we
can start
working towards an official release of the tool.

Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply
here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?


-Donald




-- 
Erik B. Craig 

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Shiva Kumar H R]

Let's do both "move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to
devtools/trunk/j2g" and "update the Development Tools section of the
Geronimo site" at the earliest.

In http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07349.html a user
was still using some old wiki docs (
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/jboss-to-geronimo-jca-migration.html) for
migrating from JBoss to Geronimo. I think it would be a good idea to update
all related wiki docs (like the one above) with a highlighted link at the
top pointing to the availability of J2G toolkit.

- Shiva

On 9/12/07, Erik B. Craig < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes!
>
> I am all for this, especially so we can progress it onto the Development
> Tools section of the Geronimo site to make it more noticeable and easily
> accessible to people interested in migrating applications, as right now the
> only way to download it or even be aware of it is by digging through our
> wiki.
>
> On 9/12/07, Donald Woods < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move
> > the
> > current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can
> > start
> > working towards an official release of the tool.
> >
> > Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as
> > the code
> > is already in our svn repo?
> >
> >
> > -Donald
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Erik B. Craig

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Lin Sun]

+1 - I agree this is a good thing to do.   Let me know if you need any 
help here.


Lin

Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds good.  I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call 
a Vote.  Thanks.


-Donald

Jacek Laskowski wrote:

On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as 
the code

is already in our svn repo?


I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
it unless someone objects. It's a good practice to call a vote (after
a discussion) and again after 72 hours tally it and act accordingly.

Jacek

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Kevan Miller]

On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to  
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,  
so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here,  
as the code is already in our svn repo?


No vote is required. Discuss it (like you are doing) and barring  
objections, do it...


My 2 cents -- I agree that it is a good thing to do...

--kevan

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Jason Warner]

The tool seems to already be getting some attention from users in the
community.  I think, moving it out of sandbox and into devtools might
increase the interest in it.  That seems like a good thing to me.

-Jason Warner

On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sounds good.  I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call a
> Vote.  Thanks.
>
> -Donald
>
> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as
> the code
> >> is already in our svn repo?
> >
> > I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
> > intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
> > it unless someone objects. It's a good practice to call a vote (after
> > a discussion) and again after 72 hours tally it and act accordingly.
> >
> > Jacek
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Donald Woods]

Sounds good.  I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call a 
Vote.  Thanks.


-Donald

Jacek Laskowski wrote:

On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?


I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
it unless someone objects. It's a good practice to call a vote (after
a discussion) and again after 72 hours tally it and act accordingly.

Jacek



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Jacek Laskowski]

On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
> is already in our svn repo?

I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
it unless someone objects. It's a good practice to call a vote (after
a discussion) and again after 72 hours tally it and act accordingly.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

[Erik B. Craig]

Yes!

I am all for this, especially so we can progress it onto the Development
Tools section of the Geronimo site to make it more noticeable and easily
accessible to people interested in migrating applications, as right now the
only way to download it or even be aware of it is by digging through our
wiki.

On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move
> the
> current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can start
> working towards an official release of the tool.
>
> Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the
> code
> is already in our svn repo?
>
>
> -Donald
>
>


-- 
Erik B. Craig