On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1
Let me know if you need help releasing them
Donald,
That would be great.
--kevan
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:41 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Would anyone object if I modified it to use the maven-remote-
resources plugin?
Maybe. I think the NOTICE files that it generates are messy (even the
new version), misleading or confusing, and sometimes incorrect. Since
I'm the one that
On Nov 27, 2007 9:52 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a
release?
+1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Let the release begin.
If your looking for someone to goat herd it I can help you with that .
On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the
release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release
of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
geronimo-connector jars).
TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems
like a good time to start prepping for a
+1
Let me know if you need help releasing them
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release
of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
geronimo-connector jars).
TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues.
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. it seems
like a good time to start prepping for a release.
+1
Anybody have pending changes?
No, I do not have any pending changes.
Thanks
Anita
Would anyone object if I modified it to use the maven-remote-
resources plugin?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the
release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
+1
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release
of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
geronimo-connector jars).
TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems
like a good time to start prepping
