Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-31 Thread Fritz Oconer
+1

Regards,
Fritz Oconer

Hiram Chirino wrote:

> Sorry to have to call this vote again.  While the vote was up at the
> incubator, some last minute issues were found.  The readme file did
> not properly refer to ActiveMQ as "Apache ActiveMQ".
>
> I also took this opportunity to include the fix for 2 major bugs that
> would have waited for the 4.1 release:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> * http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-726
>
> The new binaries are up at:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-ac
tivemq/distributions/
>
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>



Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-31 Thread James Strachan

+1

On 5/30/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sorry to have to call this vote again.  While the vote was up at the
incubator, some last minute issues were found.  The readme file did
not properly refer to ActiveMQ as "Apache ActiveMQ".

I also took this opportunity to include the fix for 2 major bugs that
would have waited for the 4.1 release:

* https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
* http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-726

The new binaries are up at:

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/

The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.

Here's my +1

--
Regards,
Hiram




--

James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-24 Thread Rob DellaFortuna

For this release, are there plans to bring the Openwire dotnet client up to
spec with the current 4.0 java implementation?

Cheers,
Rob.

On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ok. quick status report on the 718 issue.  I applied the patch and the
good news is that subsequent openwire version is still compatible with
version that is in the current 4.0 release candidate that we voted on.
This is because our Java implementation of openwire does not
use/validate the size prefix on each command.  That size prefix was
put there to support future NIO based transports and other openwire
implementations where having the size prefix makes it easier to
implement the protocol.

So I'm all for just including the patch as bug fix in the next (4.1)
release of activemq.  So I'm still at +1 for releasing the current
binary.

On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so 718 was partially valid.  I'm going to rebuild and test the new
> client against the 4.0 rc.  If the patch does not break compatibility
> with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is.  if it does break
> compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
> candidate for 4.0.
>
> Any opinions?
>
>
> On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Opps.  I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
> > I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1.  So I'm
> > retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
> > interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
> > double check me.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I retract my +1..  This issue has just been reported:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> > >
> > > We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> > > now, we will never be able to fix.
> > >
> > > So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the
provided
> > > patch.  Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've
tested it
> > > > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various
release
> > > > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files
etc)
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch
up...
> > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > > > >
> > > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release
notes:
> > > > >
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for
their
> > > > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's my +1
> > > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Congrats on all the great work!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>


--
Regards,
Hiram



Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-22 Thread Hiram Chirino

Ok. quick status report on the 718 issue.  I applied the patch and the
good news is that subsequent openwire version is still compatible with
version that is in the current 4.0 release candidate that we voted on.
This is because our Java implementation of openwire does not
use/validate the size prefix on each command.  That size prefix was
put there to support future NIO based transports and other openwire
implementations where having the size prefix makes it easier to
implement the protocol.

So I'm all for just including the patch as bug fix in the next (4.1)
release of activemq.  So I'm still at +1 for releasing the current
binary.

On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

so 718 was partially valid.  I'm going to rebuild and test the new
client against the 4.0 rc.  If the patch does not break compatibility
with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is.  if it does break
compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
candidate for 4.0.

Any opinions?


On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Opps.  I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
> I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1.  So I'm
> retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
> interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
> double check me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I retract my +1..  This issue has just been reported:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> >
> > We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> > now, we will never be able to fix.
> >
> > So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
> > patch.  Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
> >
> >
> > On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> > > >
> > > > 
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > > >
> > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > > >
> > > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > > >
> > > > Here's my +1
> > > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Congrats on all the great work!
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>


--
Regards,
Hiram




--
Regards,
Hiram


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-22 Thread Hiram Chirino

so 718 was partially valid.  I'm going to rebuild and test the new
client against the 4.0 rc.  If the patch does not break compatibility
with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is.  if it does break
compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
candidate for 4.0.

Any opinions?


On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Opps.  I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1.  So I'm
retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
double check me.

Thanks!

On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I retract my +1..  This issue has just been reported:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
>
> We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> now, we will never be able to fix.
>
> So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
> patch.  Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
>
>
> On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James Strachan wrote:
> > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> > >
> > > 
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > >
> > >
> > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > >
> > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > >
> > > Here's my +1
> > >
> > +1
> >
> > Congrats on all the great work!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>


--
Regards,
Hiram




--
Regards,
Hiram


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-22 Thread Hiram Chirino

Opps.  I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1.  So I'm
retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
double check me.

Thanks!

On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I retract my +1..  This issue has just been reported:

https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718

We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
now, we will never be able to fix.

So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
patch.  Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!


On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
> > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> >
> > 
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> >
> >
> > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> >
> > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release binary
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > blessing to ship this release officially.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> +1
>
> Congrats on all the great work!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>


--
Regards,
Hiram




--
Regards,
Hiram


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-18 Thread John Sisson

+1

John
James Strachan wrote:

We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/ 



The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.

Here's my +1





Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-17 Thread Bruce Snyder

On 5/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/

The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.


+1

Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-17 Thread Hiram Chirino

Hi Jonas,

We has installed some RewriteRules to handle the changed links but the
redirects do not seem to be working.  So I just added a symbolic link
that should take care of the problem once the content gets mirrors to
the webserver.

Regards,
Hiram

On 5/17/06, Jonas Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

corrected some broken links on the readme on svn trunk . I wonder if we can
create a new set of distro with this minor correction?

regards,
Jonas
- Original Message -
From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:31 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ


> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> 
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> --
>
> James
> ---
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/





--
Regards,
Hiram


Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-16 Thread Guillaume Nodet

+1

Guillaume

James Strachan wrote:


We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/ 



The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.

Here's my +1



Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-16 Thread Rob Davies

+1

cheers,

Rob
On 16 May 2006, at 18:31, James Strachan wrote:


We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/ 
incubator-activemq/distributions/


The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.

Here's my +1

--

James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/




Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ

2006-05-16 Thread Hiram Chirino

+1

I want to thank everyone that has been involved in this long release
and testing process.  It has made ActiveMQ an outstanding piece of
software!


On 5/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/

The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html

if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release

Please vote to approve this release binary

[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.

Here's my +1

--

James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/




--
Regards,
Hiram