Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2

[David Blevins]

I didn't figure there wasn't any harm in allowing the RTC system to  
be used for more than what is currently required by PMC mandate.  I  
mean if someone really wants to have their work reviewed, more power  
to them.


We can change it back if you prefer.

-David

On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a  
"Wish" for which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to  
documentation, so why were these issue types excluded

from the workflow ?
I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize  
issues if they do not have the same workflow.


On 8/7/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Previously,  
this was set up so that only new features and improvements

followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
Does anyone know why this was changed?


Regards,
Alan





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2

[Hernan Cunico]

Howdy, AFAIK documentation is not affected by RTC.

Cheers!
Hernan

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC.  Does 
RTC really cover documentation?  I thought that it was for improvements 
and new features.



Regards,
Alan

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a "Wish" 
for which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to documentation, 
so why were these issue types excluded

from the workflow ?
I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize 
issues if they do not have the same workflow.


On 8/7/06, *Alan D. Cabrera * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


Previously, this was set up so that only new features and
improvements
followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
Does anyone know why this was changed?


Regards,
Alan





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet 

Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2

[Guillaume Nodet]

They can be moved, unless they do not have the same workflow afaik.On 8/7/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


  
  


Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC. 
Does RTC really cover documentation?  I thought that it was for
improvements and new features.


Regards,
Alan

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I
had a "Wish" for which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to documentation, so
why were these issue types excluded
  
from the workflow ?
I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize issues
if they do not have the same workflow.
  
  On 8/7/06, Alan
D. Cabrera
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
  Previously,
this was set up so that only new features and improvements

followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
Does anyone know why this was changed?


Regards,
Alan


  
  
  
  
  
-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet





-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet

Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC. 
Does RTC really cover documentation?  I thought that it was for
improvements and new features.


Regards,
Alan

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I
had a "Wish" for which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to documentation, so
why were these issue types excluded
  
from the workflow ?
I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize issues
if they do not have the same workflow.
  
  On 8/7/06, Alan
D. Cabrera
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
  Previously,
this was set up so that only new features and improvements

followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
Does anyone know why this was changed?


Regards,
Alan


  
  
  
  
  
-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2

[Guillaume Nodet]

I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a "Wish" for which i provided a patch but was unableto put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to documentation, so why were these issue types excluded
from the workflow ?I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize issues if they do not have the same workflow.On 8/7/06, Alan D. Cabrera
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Previously, this was set up so that only new features and improvements
followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.Does anyone know why this was changed?Regards,Alan-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet