Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
I think the overall process is pretty much worked out now. You can start the process by sending a note to the Geronimo PMC (private@) requesting access to the TCK with a quick summary of your goals. Best wishes, Paul On 3/2/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for > ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion > will be resolved very soon. any news here ?
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion will be resolved very soon. any news here ?
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
that's not my duty ;) On 2/24/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is done, I've dropped the local repo and did a full clean build and it appears to be happy. Now if we could just get rid of the other module local repos ;-) --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: > Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some > tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to > minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up > MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in > Geronimo's src tree will be a big help. > > Best wishes, > Paul > > On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> soon... >> >> our continuum "root" account is locked... >> my own account isn't able to change the goals from >> clean install >> >> to >> clean install source:jar deploy >> >> >> ... >> >> I'll keep you posted on the progress >> >> -M >> >> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues >> > > figured out, during runing the TCK ? >> > > >> > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? >> > > (I signed the NDA already in the past) >> > >> > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access >> to G- >> > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), >> > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) >> > >> > --jason >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh >> >> further stuff: >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
This is done, I've dropped the local repo and did a full clean build and it appears to be happy. Now if we could just get rid of the other module local repos ;-) --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in Geronimo's src tree will be a big help. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: soon... our continuum "root" account is locked... my own account isn't able to change the goals from clean install to clean install source:jar deploy ... I'll keep you posted on the progress -M On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > > (I signed the NDA already in the past) > > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) > > --jason > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Cool! I imagine its done now... so we can remove our local myfaces 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts :-) Thanks! --jason On Feb 24, 2007, at 6:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Jason, continuum is right now building and deploying to this m2_repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ HTH, Matthias On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the std repo? --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > soon... > > our continuum "root" account is locked... > my own account isn't able to change the goals from > clean install > > to > clean install source:jar deploy > > > ... > > I'll keep you posted on the progress > > -M > > On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues >> > figured out, during runing the TCK ? >> > >> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? >> > (I signed the NDA already in the past) >> >> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access >> to G- >> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), >> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) >> >> --jason >> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Jason, continuum is right now building and deploying to this m2_repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ HTH, Matthias On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the std repo? --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > soon... > > our continuum "root" account is locked... > my own account isn't able to change the goals from > clean install > > to > clean install source:jar deploy > > > ... > > I'll keep you posted on the progress > > -M > > On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues >> > figured out, during runing the TCK ? >> > >> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? >> > (I signed the NDA already in the past) >> >> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access >> to G- >> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), >> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) >> >> --jason >> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the std repo? --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: soon... our continuum "root" account is locked... my own account isn't able to change the goals from clean install to clean install source:jar deploy ... I'll keep you posted on the progress -M On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > (I signed the NDA already in the past) The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) --jason -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
keep me posted, guys. time by time I am reading mails here... On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, a MyFaces representative could definitely gather some very useful information by joining Geronimo's TCK list. Like Jason says the Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion will be resolved very soon. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > > (I signed the NDA already in the past) > > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) > > --jason > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Yes, a MyFaces representative could definitely gather some very useful information by joining Geronimo's TCK list. Like Jason says the Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion will be resolved very soon. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > (I signed the NDA already in the past) The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) --jason
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in Geronimo's src tree will be a big help. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: soon... our continuum "root" account is locked... my own account isn't able to change the goals from clean install to clean install source:jar deploy ... I'll keep you posted on the progress -M On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > > (I signed the NDA already in the past) > > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) > > --jason > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
soon... our continuum "root" account is locked... my own account isn't able to change the goals from clean install to clean install source:jar deploy ... I'll keep you posted on the progress -M On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues > figured out, during runing the TCK ? > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? > (I signed the NDA already in the past) The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) --jason -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues figured out, during runing the TCK ? Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? (I signed the NDA already in the past) The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G- TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA), hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-) --jason
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Hi, I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues figured out, during runing the TCK ? Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list? (I signed the NDA already in the past) Thanks, Matthias On 2/1/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with the goal and it sounds like things are nearly there ... so I think it makes sense to stick with MyFaces. I appreciate your work on this and their willingness to help us out too. Hopefully we will have a MyFaces release soon. Is there are target date they are working toward? Should we have a date in mind where we might consider alternatives if we don't have what is needed? Joe Tim McConnell wrote: > Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they > are very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation > There are some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them > the benefit of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to > assume that MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose > another alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not > going to deliver. > > Joe Bohn wrote: >> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list >> about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does >> anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if >> it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? >> >> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly >> glassfish)? >> >> Joe >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
I agree with the goal and it sounds like things are nearly there ... so I think it makes sense to stick with MyFaces. I appreciate your work on this and their willingness to help us out too. Hopefully we will have a MyFaces release soon. Is there are target date they are working toward? Should we have a date in mind where we might consider alternatives if we don't have what is needed? Joe Tim McConnell wrote: Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they are very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation There are some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them the benefit of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to assume that MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose another alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not going to deliver. Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they are very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation There are some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them the benefit of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to assume that MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose another alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not going to deliver. Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
The working version of JSF 1.2 is in: svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current12 Paul McMahan wrote: I built from core/branches/jsf12 Best wishes, Paul On 1/31/07, Don Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul, Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ? Don On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an > apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it > to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the > faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0. > > Best wishes, > Paul > > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since > > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My > > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're > > going to do it, better now than later. > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about > > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if > > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional > > in time for our 2.0 beta? > > > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? > > > > Joe > > > > -sachin > > > > > -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
I built from core/branches/jsf12 Best wishes, Paul On 1/31/07, Don Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul, Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ? Don On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an > apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it > to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the > faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0. > > Best wishes, > Paul > > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since > > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My > > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're > > going to do it, better now than later. > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about > > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if > > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional > > in time for our 2.0 beta? > > > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? > > > > Joe > > > > -sachin > > > > >
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Paul, Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ? Don On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0. Best wishes, Paul On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're > going to do it, better now than later. > > > > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional > in time for our 2.0 beta? > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? > > Joe > > -sachin > >
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Thanks Paul. That sounds really good. I was hoping that we could stay with Myfaces too but I was just getting concerned based upon the comments I kept seeing. It sounds like we're closer than I thought. Thanks, Joe Paul McMahan wrote: I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0. Best wishes, Paul On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're going to do it, better now than later. On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe -sachin
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0. Best wishes, Paul On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're going to do it, better now than later. On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe -sachin
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're going to do it, better now than later. On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe -sachin
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Hi Joe, I've asked a couple questions on the MyFaces devlist tonight to hopefully address some of your questions. First, I've asked for assistance getting my local MyFaces build working again (so we can at least have something to start using for TCK testing). And secondly I've asked for a rough estimate for where they think they are in their JSR-252 implementation. Hopefully this will help shed some light. I'll post responses as soon as I get anything. Thanks. Joe Bohn wrote: I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta? Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)? Joe -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
