Re: Remove corba specs from specs/trunk

2006-12-12 Thread Dain Sundstrom

+1

-dain

On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

I'm not aware of any use of the corba specs currently in specs/ 
trunk (geronimo-spec-corba, geronimo-corba_2.3_spec, and geronimo- 
corba_3.0_spec). For geronimo, yoko is now our corba spec provider.


Rather than releasing these 3 specs which we aren't using, testing,  
etc. I'd prefer to remove them. Anybody see a problem with this? If  
not, I'll remove them shortly...


--kevan




Re: Remove corba specs from specs/trunk

2006-12-12 Thread David Jencks

+1

david jencks
On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

I'm not aware of any use of the corba specs currently in specs/ 
trunk (geronimo-spec-corba, geronimo-corba_2.3_spec, and geronimo- 
corba_3.0_spec). For geronimo, yoko is now our corba spec provider.


Rather than releasing these 3 specs which we aren't using, testing,  
etc. I'd prefer to remove them. Anybody see a problem with this? If  
not, I'll remove them shortly...


--kevan




Re: Remove corba specs from specs/trunk

2006-12-12 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy

+1

--vamsi

On 12/13/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I'm not aware of any use of the corba specs currently in specs/trunk
(geronimo-spec-corba, geronimo-corba_2.3_spec, and geronimo-
corba_3.0_spec). For geronimo, yoko is now our corba spec provider.

Rather than releasing these 3 specs which we aren't using, testing,
etc. I'd prefer to remove them. Anybody see a problem with this? If
not, I'll remove them shortly...

--kevan



Re: Remove corba specs from specs/trunk

2006-12-12 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 remove old stuff...its still available in the tags so there is no  
harm I can see.


On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

I'm not aware of any use of the corba specs currently in specs/ 
trunk (geronimo-spec-corba, geronimo-corba_2.3_spec, and geronimo- 
corba_3.0_spec). For geronimo, yoko is now our corba spec provider.


Rather than releasing these 3 specs which we aren't using, testing,  
etc. I'd prefer to remove them. Anybody see a problem with this? If  
not, I'll remove them shortly...


--kevan



Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]