Re: Remove jmx-debug application
+1 --jason On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX consoles out there. For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the console as a portlet. This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated ObjectName methods on the kernel. What do you think? -dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
mc4j might work too, though it may need some updates to support 1.x, not sure: http://mc4j.org/ --jason On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX consoles out there. For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the console as a portlet. This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated ObjectName methods on the kernel. What do you think? -dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
If no body started work on this JMX portlet I can start working on it. --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug > application. The > application is very ugly and hard to us. Also > doesn't allow you to > execute simple operations like setAttribute or > invoke, so it is > really only useful for display purposes. Instead a > user can connect > to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the > other JMX > consoles out there. > > For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at > integrating the new jmx > console that was donted by Simon Godik in > GERONIMO-1163 into the > console as a portlet. > > This will also remove one of the biggest users of > the deprecated > ObjectName methods on the kernel. > > What do you think? > > -dain > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Looks like you can... http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/jconsole.html - sachin On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:00 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: The extent if my playing was to poke mbeans. I have no idea if it can graph data. If it can't maybe someone knows of a better one that can. -dain On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are exceeded and so on? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector username: system password: manager Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right -dain On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX consoles out there. For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the console as a portlet. This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated ObjectName methods on the kernel. What do you think? -dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
The extent if my playing was to poke mbeans. I have no idea if it can graph data. If it can't maybe someone knows of a better one that can. -dain On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are exceeded and so on? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector username: system password: manager Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right -dain On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX consoles out there. For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the console as a portlet. This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated ObjectName methods on the kernel. What do you think? -dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are exceeded and so on? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector > > username: system > password: manager > > Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right > > -dain > > On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking > > JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The > >> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to > >> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is > >> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect > >> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX > >> consoles out there. > >> > >> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx > >> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the > >> console as a portlet. > >> > >> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated > >> ObjectName methods on the kernel. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> -dain > >> > >
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector username: system password: manager Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right -dain On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX consoles out there. For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the console as a portlet. This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated ObjectName methods on the kernel. What do you think? -dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there? Thanks, Aaron On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The > application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to > execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is > really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect > to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX > consoles out there. > > For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx > console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the > console as a portlet. > > This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated > ObjectName methods on the kernel. > > What do you think? > > -dain >
