Re: Web Builders
> --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm tempted > > > to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector > > unchanged. I think we should have a single jar containing o.a.g.xbeans.javaee.* o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.connector stuff and o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.jaxrpc stuff Thanks Anita Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Re: Web Builders
David J, I have attached patches to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723. This is a first step towards removing references to j2ee schemas. I might have overlooked some finer points. Suggestions for improvement are welcome.. Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:05 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > > Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to > > > compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some > > code > > > hack. > > >Now the connector-builder needs the following classes: > > > ActivationspecType; > > > AdminobjectType; > > > ConfigPropertyType; > > > ConnectionDefinitionType; > > > ConnectorDocument; > > > ConnectorType; > > > MessagelistenerType; > > > ResourceadapterType; > > > Where can I fine these? > > > > hm. the connector spec is unchanged between 1.4 and 5 so I > didn't > > > > include it in the 5 schema class jar. I think this means we need > > both the schema jars for 2.0. Alternatively I guess we could add > the > > > > schemas from 1.4 to the 5 jar? I don't know how many problems this > > > will cause like 2 description classes. > > I also think we could add connector to the 5 schema jar. I just > managed to get everything built and a running server! I will post the > patch for your review. I had to sneak in the 1.4 schema jar in > dependency.xml of j2ee-schema for the connector. I have used a hack > to > override getStringValue() in connector-builder and > webservices-builder. >Comments welcome.. > > Thanks > Anita > > > > > For me anyway what to do here needs some more thought. I'm tempted > > > to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector > > unchanged. > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. > Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com > Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
Re: Web Builders
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:05 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to > > compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some > code > > hack. > >Now the connector-builder needs the following classes: > > ActivationspecType; > > AdminobjectType; > > ConfigPropertyType; > > ConnectionDefinitionType; > > ConnectorDocument; > > ConnectorType; > > MessagelistenerType; > > ResourceadapterType; > > Where can I fine these? > > hm. the connector spec is unchanged between 1.4 and 5 so I didn't > > include it in the 5 schema class jar. I think this means we need > both the schema jars for 2.0. Alternatively I guess we could add the > > schemas from 1.4 to the 5 jar? I don't know how many problems this > will cause like 2 description classes. I also think we could add connector to the 5 schema jar. I just managed to get everything built and a running server! I will post the patch for your review. I had to sneak in the 1.4 schema jar in dependency.xml of j2ee-schema for the connector. I have used a hack to override getStringValue() in connector-builder and webservices-builder. Comments welcome.. Thanks Anita > > For me anyway what to do here needs some more thought. I'm tempted > to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector > unchanged. > > thanks > david jencks Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
Re: Web Builders
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:05 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some code hack. Now the connector-builder needs the following classes: ActivationspecType; AdminobjectType; ConfigPropertyType; ConnectionDefinitionType; ConnectorDocument; ConnectorType; MessagelistenerType; ResourceadapterType; Where can I fine these? hm. the connector spec is unchanged between 1.4 and 5 so I didn't include it in the 5 schema class jar. I think this means we need both the schema jars for 2.0. Alternatively I guess we could add the schemas from 1.4 to the 5 jar? I don't know how many problems this will cause like 2 description classes. For me anyway what to do here needs some more thought. I'm tempted to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector unchanged. thanks david jencks Thanks Anita --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:36 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: I am trying to use javaee5 xbeans in webservices-builder. I don't think that will work. the current webservices-builder module is for jaxrpc and it uses different xml than javaee, and javaee doesn't include any version of that xml (something we can all be very happy about :-) Most of the stuff in webservices-builder was to support the jaxrpc mapping mess, which has been totally replaced by jaxb. I think we can leave webservices-builder as is, perhaps labeling it so its clear it refers to jaxrpc and not jaxws, and see if we need a universal module for jaxws. At this point I don't know: it's quite possible that both cxf and axis2 include 90% of the stuff they need and the remaining 10% is easier to implement specific to the ws container. It's also possible we can use a common module. I think we need to get more of both working before we know unless some experts who actually know cxf and axis2 speak up :-) thanks david jencks The following classes are not in geronimo-schema-jee_5 jar. Where can I find them? ExceptionMappingType; JavaWsdlMappingDocument JavaWsdlMappingType; PackageMappingType; ServiceEndpointInterfaceMappingType; ServiceEndpointMethodMappingType; Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: ConnectorDocument$Facty.class ConnectorDocument.class ConnectorType$Factory.class ConnectorType.class Have they been renamed/moved? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. Yikes!! It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? yes. Should we remove dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to web-2.5-builder? Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be no problems there. Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! Sure.. Anita thanks david jencks Thanks Anita __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ __ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited __ __ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
Re: Web Builders
Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some code hack. Now the connector-builder needs the following classes: ActivationspecType; AdminobjectType; ConfigPropertyType; ConnectionDefinitionType; ConnectorDocument; ConnectorType; MessagelistenerType; ResourceadapterType; Where can I fine these? Thanks Anita --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:36 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > I am trying to use javaee5 xbeans in webservices-builder. > > I don't think that will work. the current webservices-builder module > > is for jaxrpc and it uses different xml than javaee, and javaee > doesn't include any version of that xml (something we can all be very > > happy about :-) > > Most of the stuff in webservices-builder was to support the jaxrpc > mapping mess, which has been totally replaced by jaxb. I think we > can leave webservices-builder as is, perhaps labeling it so its clear > > it refers to jaxrpc and not jaxws, and see if we need a universal > module for jaxws. At this point I don't know: it's quite possible > that both cxf and axis2 include 90% of the stuff they need and the > remaining 10% is easier to implement specific to the ws container. > It's also possible we can use a common module. I think we need to > get more of both working before we know unless some experts who > actually know cxf and axis2 speak up :-) > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > The > > following classes are not in geronimo-schema-jee_5 jar. Where can I > > find them? > > > > ExceptionMappingType; > > JavaWsdlMappingDocument JavaWsdlMappingType; > > PackageMappingType; > > ServiceEndpointInterfaceMappingType; > > ServiceEndpointMethodMappingType; > > > > Thanks > > Anita > > > > --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: > >> ConnectorDocument$Facty.class > >> ConnectorDocument.class > >> ConnectorType$Factory.class > >> ConnectorType.class > >>Have they been renamed/moved? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Anita > >> > >> --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > >Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a > dependency. > > Yikes!! > > It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and > >>> geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > as > > follows: > > web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec > > naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? > > yes. > > > Should we remove > > dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to > web-2.5-builder? > > Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat > >> builders > >>> > are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should > be > >>> no > > problems there. > > Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! > >>> > >>> Sure.. > >>> > >>> Anita > >>> > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > Thanks > > Anita > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >>> > >>> > >>> __ > >>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> __ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > __ > > Yahoo! Music Unlimited > > Access over 1 million songs. > > http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
Re: Web Builders
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:36 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: I am trying to use javaee5 xbeans in webservices-builder. I don't think that will work. the current webservices-builder module is for jaxrpc and it uses different xml than javaee, and javaee doesn't include any version of that xml (something we can all be very happy about :-) Most of the stuff in webservices-builder was to support the jaxrpc mapping mess, which has been totally replaced by jaxb. I think we can leave webservices-builder as is, perhaps labeling it so its clear it refers to jaxrpc and not jaxws, and see if we need a universal module for jaxws. At this point I don't know: it's quite possible that both cxf and axis2 include 90% of the stuff they need and the remaining 10% is easier to implement specific to the ws container. It's also possible we can use a common module. I think we need to get more of both working before we know unless some experts who actually know cxf and axis2 speak up :-) thanks david jencks The following classes are not in geronimo-schema-jee_5 jar. Where can I find them? ExceptionMappingType; JavaWsdlMappingDocument JavaWsdlMappingType; PackageMappingType; ServiceEndpointInterfaceMappingType; ServiceEndpointMethodMappingType; Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: ConnectorDocument$Facty.class ConnectorDocument.class ConnectorType$Factory.class ConnectorType.class Have they been renamed/moved? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. Yikes!! It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? yes. Should we remove dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to web-2.5-builder? Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be no problems there. Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! Sure.. Anita thanks david jencks Thanks Anita __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ __ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
Re: Web Builders
I am trying to use javaee5 xbeans in webservices-builder. The following classes are not in geronimo-schema-jee_5 jar. Where can I find them? ExceptionMappingType; JavaWsdlMappingDocument JavaWsdlMappingType; PackageMappingType; ServiceEndpointInterfaceMappingType; ServiceEndpointMethodMappingType; Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: > ConnectorDocument$Facty.class > ConnectorDocument.class > ConnectorType$Factory.class > ConnectorType.class >Have they been renamed/moved? > > Thanks > Anita > > --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > > > >Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a > > > dependency. > > > > > > Yikes!! > > > > It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > > as > > > > follows: > > > > web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec > > > > naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> > > > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > > > Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? > > > > > > yes. > > > > > > > Should we remove > > > > dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to > > > web-2.5-builder? > > > > > > Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat > builders > > > > > are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be > > no > > > > > > problems there. > > > > > > Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! > > > > Sure.. > > > > Anita > > > > > > > > thanks > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Anita > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
Re: Web Builders
--- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > >Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a > > dependency. > > > > Yikes!! > > > It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > as > > > follows: > > > web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec > > > naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> > > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > > Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? > > > > yes. I changed j2ee-schema to use geronimo-schema-jee_5 jar. So I must change j2ee-builder, in other word the EarConfigBuilder should use org.apache.geronimo.xbeans.javaee.* This means the test war/jar/rars must be generated for javaee5. Does SchemaConversion need to be updated to handle conversion from 1.4 to 5 namespace? > > > > > Should we remove > > > dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to > > web-2.5-builder? > > > > Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders > > > are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be > no > > > > problems there. Are the following tests still meaningful? GenericToSpecificPlanConverter WebAppDconfigTest Thanks Anita > > > > Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! > > Sure.. > > Anita > > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Anita > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
Re: Web Builders
The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: ConnectorDocument$Facty.class ConnectorDocument.class ConnectorType$Factory.class ConnectorType.class Have they been renamed/moved? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > >Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a > > dependency. > > > > Yikes!! > > > It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > as > > > follows: > > > web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec > > > naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> > > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > > Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? > > > > yes. > > > > > Should we remove > > > dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to > > web-2.5-builder? > > > > Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders > > > are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be > no > > > > problems there. > > > > Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! > > Sure.. > > Anita > > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Anita > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Web Builders
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > >Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a > dependency. > > Yikes!! > > It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > as > > follows: > > web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec > > naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> > > geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 > > Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? > > yes. > > > Should we remove > > dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to > web-2.5-builder? > > Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders > are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be no > > problems there. > > Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! Sure.. Anita > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > Thanks > > Anita > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Web Builders
On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. Yikes!! It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec naming-builder --> j2ee-schema --> geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 Should naming-builder be changed to use 1.5? yes. Should we remove dependency on web-builder and move all the stuff to web-2.5-builder? Very definitely!! It looks like both the jetty and tomcat builders are already using the web25 AbstractWebBuilder so there should be no problems there. Can you do this? Thanks for noticing this problem!!! thanks david jencks Thanks Anita __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
