RE: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hernan, Thank you very much! Now it works fine for me too. Vasily -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] Hi Vasily, I just copied the page from Atlassian to cwiki and I was able to save it with no problems. It all seems to work just fine now, let me know if you find any issues. Cheers! Hernan Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > Hernan, > > Thank you very much! > > Vasily > > > -Original Message- > From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] > > Hi Vasily, > I just reported this issue to Atlassian > (https://support.atlassian.com/browse/CSP-4236). > Not sure why confluence is complaining, that page is not that big and I > was able to migrate it from > the other installation. It actually is failing to save any changes, > there might be some "confluence" > code in the doc that this new version is not too happy with. > > I'll review the page markup as soon as I have a min, if I can't find > anything suspicious I could > re-import it from an XML (a new one from the Atlassian install) while we > still look for the final > solution. > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > >>Hernan, >> >>Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki! >> >>But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at: >> > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp > >>Server2004 >>to the new location at: >> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC10/SPECjAppServer2004 > >>I copied the wiki content and got a successful preview, but when I > > press > >>"Save", I get a System Error: >> >>java.lang.IllegalStateException: Form too large >>at org.mortbay.http.HttpRequest.extractParameters()V(Unknown > > Source) > >>I see that my doc is rather big, but it worked fine on the old >>Confluence at opensource.atlassian.com. >> >>Is it some new feature of Confluence 2.1.5a? :) >> >>Vasily Zakharov >>Intel Middleware Products Division >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:30 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] >> >>All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit > > permissions. > >>Cheers! >>Hernan >> >>John Sisson wrote: >> >> >>>Who has access to fix this? >>> >>>John >>> >>>Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. >>>> >>>>--jason >>>> >>>> >>>>On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hernan Cunico wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Hi All, >>>>>>I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute >>>>>>directly to the documentation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged >> >>in, >> >> >>>>>I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible >> >>that >> >> >>>>>permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for >> >>confluence-users >> >> >>>>>(or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? >>>>> >>>>>When I'm logged out, I see: >>>>> >>>>>Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project >> >> >>>>>Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) >> >>Apache >> >> >>>>>Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) >>>>> >>>>>When I'm logged in, I see: >>>>> >>>>>Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation >>>>>(cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) >>>>> >>>>>Cheers, >>>>>Erin >>>> >>>> >>>> >
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
That works too. On Jun 12, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: How about GTOC for the table of contents and GERONIMO for the general stuff. -dain On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
How about GTOC for the table of contents and GERONIMO for the general stuff. -dain On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/ develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:36 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? I see your concerns and share them, but don't see how having a space amounting to "uncategorized" eliminates disorganization. I just see it being confusing as most people's first inclination will be to document general Geronimo stuff that's not version specific in the GERONIMO space. It's also pretty trivial to move documents. Just to add to my own post. Having the space name be "GERONIMO" doesn't eliminate disorganization either. Just all things being equal on that regard, I'd prefer to just keep it simple and use plain "GERONIMO". -David -David Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
We have currently just 4 entries there, kinda skinny I know. As we deliver new releases this list will follow along. How could we organize the content in the geronimo space so we don't loose control (structure, visibility, hierarchy, etc...)? For instance, the space we have hosted at Atlassian. There we are limited by having a single space so we get to play with just the hierarchy (we do have some issues with visibility, hierarchy and structure) If there is no separated space, would there be a top level page as a parent containing all the general stuff? or the question is about having all the general info "consolidated" via one link to the same space? Moving from one space to another (from a user/contributor perspective) should be transparent. If we change the name from Geronimo SandBox to "Geronimo General Information" for example, would that still be confusing? Could you elaborate more what would be confusing, not sure I follow. The last thing I wanted with that structure was to make the things more confusing. In addition, having a separated space provides extra benefits in terms of administration (do I need to list? :) ) Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/ develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? I see your concerns and share them, but don't see how having a space amounting to "uncategorized" eliminates disorganization. I just see it being confusing as most people's first inclination will be to document general Geronimo stuff that's not version specific in the GERONIMO space. It's also pretty trivial to move documents. -David Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/ develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? I see your concerns and share them, but don't see how having a space amounting to "uncategorized" eliminates disorganization. I just see it being confusing as most people's first inclination will be to document general Geronimo stuff that's not version specific in the GERONIMO space. It's also pretty trivial to move documents. -David Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-) I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence. I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts? Cheers! Hernan David Blevins wrote: Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hi Vasily, I just copied the page from Atlassian to cwiki and I was able to save it with no problems. It all seems to work just fine now, let me know if you find any issues. Cheers! Hernan Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hernan, Thank you very much! Vasily -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] Hi Vasily, I just reported this issue to Atlassian (https://support.atlassian.com/browse/CSP-4236). Not sure why confluence is complaining, that page is not that big and I was able to migrate it from the other installation. It actually is failing to save any changes, there might be some "confluence" code in the doc that this new version is not too happy with. I'll review the page markup as soon as I have a min, if I can't find anything suspicious I could re-import it from an XML (a new one from the Atlassian install) while we still look for the final solution. Cheers! Hernan Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hernan, Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki! But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp Server2004 to the new location at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC10/SPECjAppServer2004 I copied the wiki content and got a successful preview, but when I press "Save", I get a System Error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Form too large at org.mortbay.http.HttpRequest.extractParameters()V(Unknown Source) I see that my doc is rather big, but it worked fine on the old Confluence at opensource.atlassian.com. Is it some new feature of Confluence 2.1.5a? :) Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit permissions. Cheers! Hernan John Sisson wrote: Who has access to fix this? John Jason Dillon wrote: It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. --jason On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation (cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hi Hernan, All looks pretty great. One comment below. On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: The last section should hold "everything else", this section will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces. 1. Apache Geronimo v1.0 Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide 2. Apache Geronimo v1.1 Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide 3. Apache Geronimo Project Management Apache Geronimo Development Process Apache Geronimo Development Status 4. Apache Geronimo SandBox Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing the documentation. Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just use the GERONIMO space for "everything else." -David
RE: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hernan, Thank you very much! Vasily -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] Hi Vasily, I just reported this issue to Atlassian (https://support.atlassian.com/browse/CSP-4236). Not sure why confluence is complaining, that page is not that big and I was able to migrate it from the other installation. It actually is failing to save any changes, there might be some "confluence" code in the doc that this new version is not too happy with. I'll review the page markup as soon as I have a min, if I can't find anything suspicious I could re-import it from an XML (a new one from the Atlassian install) while we still look for the final solution. Cheers! Hernan Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > Hernan, > > Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki! > > But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at: > http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp > Server2004 > to the new location at: > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC10/SPECjAppServer2004 > > I copied the wiki content and got a successful preview, but when I press > "Save", I get a System Error: > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Form too large > at org.mortbay.http.HttpRequest.extractParameters()V(Unknown Source) > > I see that my doc is rather big, but it worked fine on the old > Confluence at opensource.atlassian.com. > > Is it some new feature of Confluence 2.1.5a? :) > > Vasily Zakharov > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > -Original Message- > From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] > > All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit permissions. > > Cheers! > Hernan > > John Sisson wrote: > >>Who has access to fix this? >> >>John >> >>Jason Dillon wrote: >> >> >>>It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. >>> >>>--jason >>> >>> >>>On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hernan Cunico wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi All, >>>>>I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute >>>>>directly to the documentation. >>>> >>>> >>>>Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged > > in, > >>>>I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible > > that > >>>>permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for > > confluence-users > >>>>(or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? >>>> >>>>When I'm logged out, I see: >>>> >>>>Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project > > >>>>Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) > > Apache > >>>>Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) >>>> >>>>When I'm logged in, I see: >>>> >>>>Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation >>>>(cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>>Erin >>> >>> >>> >> >
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hi Vasily, I just reported this issue to Atlassian (https://support.atlassian.com/browse/CSP-4236). Not sure why confluence is complaining, that page is not that big and I was able to migrate it from the other installation. It actually is failing to save any changes, there might be some "confluence" code in the doc that this new version is not too happy with. I'll review the page markup as soon as I have a min, if I can't find anything suspicious I could re-import it from an XML (a new one from the Atlassian install) while we still look for the final solution. Cheers! Hernan Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hernan, Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki! But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp Server2004 to the new location at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC10/SPECjAppServer2004 I copied the wiki content and got a successful preview, but when I press "Save", I get a System Error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Form too large at org.mortbay.http.HttpRequest.extractParameters()V(Unknown Source) I see that my doc is rather big, but it worked fine on the old Confluence at opensource.atlassian.com. Is it some new feature of Confluence 2.1.5a? :) Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit permissions. Cheers! Hernan John Sisson wrote: Who has access to fix this? John Jason Dillon wrote: It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. --jason On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation (cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
RE: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hernan, Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki! But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp Server2004 to the new location at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC10/SPECjAppServer2004 I copied the wiki content and got a successful preview, but when I press "Save", I get a System Error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Form too large at org.mortbay.http.HttpRequest.extractParameters()V(Unknown Source) I see that my doc is rather big, but it worked fine on the old Confluence at opensource.atlassian.com. Is it some new feature of Confluence 2.1.5a? :) Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish] All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit permissions. Cheers! Hernan John Sisson wrote: > Who has access to fix this? > > John > > Jason Dillon wrote: > >> It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. >> >> --jason >> >> >> On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: >> >>> Hernan Cunico wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute >>>> directly to the documentation. >>> >>> >>> Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, >>> I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that >>> permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users >>> (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? >>> >>> When I'm logged out, I see: >>> >>> Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project >>> Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache >>> Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) >>> >>> When I'm logged in, I see: >>> >>> Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation >>> (cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Erin >> >> >> > >
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
All the groups have been updated, you all should have edit permissions. Cheers! Hernan John Sisson wrote: Who has access to fix this? John Jason Dillon wrote: It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. --jason On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo)Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT)Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX)Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10)Cayenne Documentation (cayenne)Demonstration Space (ds)Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Who has access to fix this? John Jason Dillon wrote: It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. --jason On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo) Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT) Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Cayenne Documentation (cayenne) Demonstration Space (ds) Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
It appears that the other spaces need their permissions updated. --jason On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Erin Mulder wrote: Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo) Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT) Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Cayenne Documentation (cayenne) Demonstration Space (ds) Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
Re: cwiki.apache.org [longish]
Hernan Cunico wrote: > Hi All, > I have enabled public signup so now you can register and contribute > directly to the documentation. Thanks for setting this up! I just signed up, but once I was logged in, I could no longer see most of the Geronimo spaces. Is it possible that permissions have been set for Anonymous, but not for confluence-users (or whatever the equivalent role is in this installation)? When I'm logged out, I see: Apache Geronimo Documentation (geronimo) Apache Geronimo Project Management (GMOxPMGT) Apache Geronimo SandBox (GMOxSBOX) Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Apache Geronimo v1.1 (GMOxDOC11) When I'm logged in, I see: Apache Geronimo v1.0 (GMOxDOC10) Cayenne Documentation (cayenne) Demonstration Space (ds) Test Space (test) Cheers, Erin
