Re: jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
On May 3, 2007, at 10:13 PM, David Blevins wrote: On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, David Jencks wrote: I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find the configuration to search for the target gbean. One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars are now working properly. If there are problems please speak up. Seems client refs involving an abstract query no longer work. Kevan noticed this and reopened GERONIMO-3134. I'm working on a fix david jencks -David
Re: jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, David Jencks wrote: I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find the configuration to search for the target gbean. One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars are now working properly. If there are problems please speak up. Seems client refs involving an abstract query no longer work. -David
jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find the configuration to search for the target gbean. One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars are now working properly. If there are problems please speak up. thanks david jencks
