Re: What the... static compile by default

Yep. merging request is annoying and will cost us more time if conflicts exist. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 22:57 -0700, Daniel.Sun wrote: […] > > P.S. Recently I'm suffering from conjunctivitis... > Daniel, Hopefully medics have given you something to relieve the itching and pain, and that it clears up quickly. -- Russel. == Dr

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

Hi Paul, The relevant JIRA ticket has been closed as the GEP fails to get three +1 from PMC members. P.S. I seldom use arrays directly but for performance. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: Java object conversion using ConfigSlurper

I think it is useful especially for Java developers. PR is welcome. P.S. it would be better if the Java class is a Java bean(with getters and setters) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Russel, Yep. Eye drops can relieve my pain. It have to take a bit long time to recover... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

My pleasure :-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 12 May 2018, at 0:57, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for your kind words. As the commit log shows, I'm back and > trying to fix some STC issues after having a rest. This is very good news indeed. Thank you for your contributions! JSB -- Jeff Scott Brown OCI Partner and

Re: What the... static compile by default

On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 06:08 -0700, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Hi Russel, > > Yep. Eye drops can relieve my pain. It have to take a bit long time to > recover... > Good that the drops deal with the pain. Relax as much as possible to make the recovery time as short as possible. -- Russel.

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi mg, I am trying to reduce the time on smart phone and computer to relax eyes :) As for Groovy, I plan to support raw string[1] introduced by Java11 since no similar thing in Groovy. Some days ago I discussed it with Guillaume, and I will start a VOTE thread to collect three +1

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

Why? I count three +1 and one +0 votes. Remko > On May 13, 2018, at 2:21, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > The relevant JIRA ticket has been closed as the GEP fails to get three > +1 from PMC members. > > P.S. I seldom use arrays directly but for performance. > >

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 11.05.2018 20:34, Sven Reimers wrote: Hi all, Apache NetBeans is already using gitbox ... works very well for us. is there any page where I can see what it offers without setting it up? The link given in this thread here so far is not suitable. bye Jochen

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

Hi Remko, Here are Groovy PMC members http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=groovy As you can see, PMC member Paul and John vote +1, Guillaume vote +0, other PMC members does not vote... so the GEP gets only two +1 from PMC members... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

Please see my original email: "The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 PMC votes are cast." Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

That’s probably why over at Log4j we use slightly different language for voting: “The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). At least 3 +1 votes ...” It seems unfair that by not participating, it is possible to essentially vote -0 or -1 without justification... Thoughts?

Re: [VOTE] Support Java-like array

Didn’t see a requirement for three +1 votes anywhere... Paul asked for “I would like to see some more PMC votes for this proposal.” Since then, two PMC members voted, one +1 and one +0. Seems sufficient to me... Am I wrong? PMC members, if you feel differently, could you please add your vote?