Re: groovy-lang.org down for now

> On May 22, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > > On 22.05.2016 16:40, Steve Byrne wrote: >> [Copying from dev@groovy] >> >> What about backing out the change for now? This is looking really >> bad...think about how it lo

Re: http://www.groovy-lang.org/ down

> On May 22, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > > And... it's back now! YAY! > > Sorry again for the inconvenience, but this was really beyond our control > unfortunately. > > Regarding your points, Steve: > > 1) If a company is stupid to "abandon" a

Re: http://www.groovy-lang.org/ down

What about backing out the change for now? This is looking really bad...think about how it looks from the outside: 1) Pivotal appears to "abandon" Groovy as a language -- does not send a positive signal about the language's future prospects 2) _Without warning_ the groovy-lang.org