Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

Enable indy by default and remove the legacy call site. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

> On 22 May 2018, at 10.35, Paul King wrote: > > Nice list. The other thing worth adding somewhere is toolchain support for > the new Parser. > Tools like Groovydoc is needed I would say. We have some additional tools, > e.g. like Java2Groovy and others which we could then

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

groovysh does not support the new parser for the time being. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

Nice list. The other thing worth adding somewhere is toolchain support for the new Parser. Tools like Groovydoc is needed I would say. We have some additional tools, e.g. like Java2Groovy and others which we could then consider. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Jesper Steen Møller

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

>From the peanut gallery (top posting as we do here on peanut gallery ;-)) This is a GREAT list of things to do in Groovy 3.0! Thanks, Roman. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Jesper Steen Møller wrote: > Groovy 3.0 Scope (suggestion) > > TL;DR: I want to help develop

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

Hi Jesper, The new MOP is really a big thing. Jochen is too busy to push the progress, so I am not sure it will be included in Groovy 3.0.0. I wish some company would sponsor him to complete the task... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from:

Re: Proposed Groovy 3.0 Scope

Hi Jesper, good overview document, thank you & would be great if you could help with Groovy 3.0 :-) I agree that what is needed is progression towards decisions on some key questions... Cheers,mg PS: Under:"Lambda syntax for closures - Done-ish? (native lambda is enabled only in the static