Re: Vote for a 2.5 BETA release

[Paul King]

In terms of process, I think normally we prepare the release artefacts
and vote on release of those artefacts.

Cheers, Paul.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Jochen Theodorou  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> following apache tradition this vote has to be at least 72h long... a
> timespan we will need anyway to bridge the javaone caused gap ;)
>
> bye Jochen
>

Re: Vote for a 2.5 BETA release

[Jochen Theodorou]

+1

following apache tradition this vote has to be at least 72h long... a 
timespan we will need anyway to bridge the javaone caused gap ;)


bye Jochen

Vote for a 2.5 BETA release

[Nicholas Grealy]

There's been a lot of talk, a few questions but afaik no explicit vote for
the 2.5 BETA release... so here it is.

Last I heard
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/groovy-dev/201603.mbox/%3ccaj2hcd_hupv-9rkg2fvjlezwwnekpdbvhn36nyx7ivunxid...@mail.gmail.com%3E>,
the consensus was to have a release without macro documentation.

I'd like to start of the voting process with a +1.

Kind regards,
Nick Grealy

(Otherwise... can I get GROOVY-7423
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7423> into the 2.4.8 release
before it's released? A year and a half to wait for a change is getting
ridiculous IMO).