Re: Documenting primitive autoboxing
Yeah, I missed that in my initial PR. I fixed it yesterday. Thanks for looking it over! -Keegan On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Suderman Keith wrote: > Hi Keegan, > > I only gave the docs a quick look but I noticed a small typo on line 265 > of src/spec/doc/core-differences-java.adoc > > "+Because uses Objects for everything, ..." > > I susect this is supposed to read: > "Because Groovy uses Objects for everything..." > > or something similar. > > Cheers, > Keith > > On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:56 PM, Keegan Witt wrote: > > I started this. Let me know if you have any suggesitons: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/pull/94 > > -Keegan > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Jochen Theodorou > wrote: > >> Am 20.08.2015 15:34, schrieb Keegan Witt: >> [...] >> >>> If I've missed where we documented this, please point it out to me. If >>> I'm right about it not being documented, where should it be added? I >>> was thinking maybe in the"Primitive types" section in 1.4 of >>> core-object-orientation.adoc and maybe a new section in >>> core-differences-java.adoc as well. What do you think? >>> >> >> sure, fell free to add something >> >> bye blackdrag >> >> -- >> Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou >> blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ >> >> > >
Re: Documenting primitive autoboxing
Hi Keegan, I only gave the docs a quick look but I noticed a small typo on line 265 of src/spec/doc/core-differences-java.adoc "+Because uses Objects for everything, ..." I susect this is supposed to read: "Because Groovy uses Objects for everything..." or something similar. Cheers, Keith On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:56 PM, Keegan Witt wrote: > I started this. Let me know if you have any suggesitons: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/pull/94 > > -Keegan > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Am 20.08.2015 15:34, schrieb Keegan Witt: > [...] > If I've missed where we documented this, please point it out to me. If > I'm right about it not being documented, where should it be added? I > was thinking maybe in the"Primitive types" section in 1.4 of > core-object-orientation.adoc and maybe a new section in > core-differences-java.adoc as well. What do you think? > > sure, fell free to add something > > bye blackdrag > > -- > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ > >
Re: Documenting primitive autoboxing
I started this. Let me know if you have any suggesitons: https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/pull/94 -Keegan On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Am 20.08.2015 15:34, schrieb Keegan Witt: > [...] > >> If I've missed where we documented this, please point it out to me. If >> I'm right about it not being documented, where should it be added? I >> was thinking maybe in the"Primitive types" section in 1.4 of >> core-object-orientation.adoc and maybe a new section in >> core-differences-java.adoc as well. What do you think? >> > > sure, fell free to add something > > bye blackdrag > > -- > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ > >
Re: Documenting primitive autoboxing
Am 20.08.2015 15:34, schrieb Keegan Witt: [...] If I've missed where we documented this, please point it out to me. If I'm right about it not being documented, where should it be added? I was thinking maybe in the"Primitive types" section in 1.4 of core-object-orientation.adoc and maybe a new section in core-differences-java.adoc as well. What do you think? sure, fell free to add something bye blackdrag -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
