Hi Oleg and All:
I've added in core:
org.apache.http.util.VersionInfo.setUserAgent(HttpParams, String,
String, Class?)
but it is not quite right yet: The code needs adjusting to account for the
deprecated types in 4.3 {@link HttpParams} and {@link HttpProtocolParams}.
How can this be
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 21:19 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
As a tangent I want to
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 10:35 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
...
I was just thinking that the client was the right place given the
snippet in question clearly had HttpClient specific bits.
Anyway, feel free to put that code in a place you deem most appropriate.
There is now o.a.h.config
On Nov 18, 2012, at 14:31, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 10:35 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
...
I was just thinking that the client was the right place given the
snippet in question clearly had HttpClient specific bits.
Anyway, feel free to put that code
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 21:19 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
As a tangent I want to reduce this code pattern which is duplicated no less
than six times:
// determine the release version from packaged version info
final VersionInfo vi = VersionInfo.loadVersionInfo
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 21:19 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
As a tangent I want to reduce this code pattern which is duplicated no
less
than six times:
// determine the release version from packaged version
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 21:19 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
As a tangent I want to reduce this code pattern which is duplicated no
less
than six times:
Yes, I'd be in favor of either one of these changes (removing or
reporting dynamically the right version). I'd probably lean towards
removing it if pressed to express an opinion.
As I recall (although I don't have the code in front of me), the
CachingHttpClient sends a slightly different
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 06:38 -0500, Jon Moore wrote:
Yes, I'd be in favor of either one of these changes (removing or
reporting dynamically the right version). I'd probably lean towards
removing it if pressed to express an opinion.
As I recall (although I don't have the code in front of me),
On 16 November 2012 15:55, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 06:38 -0500, Jon Moore wrote:
Yes, I'd be in favor of either one of these changes (removing or
reporting dynamically the right version). I'd probably lean towards
removing it if pressed to express an
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 17:33 +, sebb wrote:
On 16 November 2012 15:55, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 06:38 -0500, Jon Moore wrote:
Yes, I'd be in favor of either one of these changes (removing or
reporting dynamically the right version). I'd probably
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
1) do nothing
2) User-Agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.2.1 (Java 1.5+ min)
3) User-Agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.2.1 (Java/1.6.0_35)
3 is in the spirit of the JRE's HttpURLConnection FWIW.
If you're collecting votes, I'd vote
As a tangent I want to reduce this code pattern which is duplicated no less
than six times:
// determine the release version from packaged version info
final VersionInfo vi = VersionInfo.loadVersionInfo
(org.apache.http.client,
13 matches
Mail list logo
