[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

2018-04-18 Thread lewis john mcgibbney
I am closing this VOTE off now. Thank you to everyone that VOTE'd. RESULT
is as follows

[6] +1 retire the HTrace podling
Lewis John McGibbney*
Sheng Wu
Ralph Goers*
P. Taylor Goetz*
Dave Fisher*
Pierre Smits*

[0] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification)

* IPMC Binding

I'll go ahead and reboot the retirement process.
Lewis

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney 
wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this
> important stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the
> HTrace Podling.
> However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.
> The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a
> lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1].
> I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was
> initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a
> Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that
> this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work
> would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial
> reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g.
> no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more.
> Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below
>
> [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling
> [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification)
>
> Thanks,
> Lewis
> P.S. Here is my +1
>
>
> [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB
> [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i
> [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn
>
> --
> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
>



-- 
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc


Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

2018-04-16 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding)

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 6:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Ralph Goers  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important
>>> stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling.
>>> However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>> The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a
>>> lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1].
>>> I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was
>>> initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a
>>> Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that
>>> this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work
>>> would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial
>>> reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g.
>>> no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more.
>>> Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling
>>> [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lewis
>>> P.S. Here is my +1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB
>>> [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i
>>> [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn
>>> 
>>> --
>>> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

2018-04-16 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding)

-Taylor

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Ralph Goers  wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Folks,
>> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important
>> stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling.
>> However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.
>> The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a
>> lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1].
>> I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was
>> initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a
>> Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that
>> this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work
>> would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial
>> reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g.
>> no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more.
>> Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below
>> 
>> [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling
>> [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Lewis
>> P.S. Here is my +1
>> 
>> 
>> [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB
>> [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i
>> [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn
>> 
>> --
>> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

2018-04-11 Thread lewis john mcgibbney
Hi Folks,
Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important
stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling.
However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.
The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a
lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1].
I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was
initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a
Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that
this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work
would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial
reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g.
no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more.
Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below

[ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling
[ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification)

Thanks,
Lewis
P.S. Here is my +1


[0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB
[1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i
[2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn

-- 
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc