Re: Proposal: error codes

2011-11-27 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
consider format. Wiki or doc? There are so many messages that could be thrown that crowdsourcing the documentation for it may allow us to cover more bases. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Error codes

2011-11-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
) AH #n should do the trick. The source would then contain ap_log_error(..., APLOGNO(0815) foo went wrong, ...); +1 To me, this is a must. This also adds a somewhat handy anchor when searching for log entries in code that may or may not span multiple lines. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Time for 2.4.0 GA??

2012-01-11 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-standard config directives with an overview of how to duplicate, I have Win7, Server 2003 and Server 2008 I can test with. I fall a bit short in how much volume I could throw at an installation, though. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Time for 2.4.0 GA??

2012-01-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
(and verifying the size returned) would do. Any other pointers or things to look for? I seem to recall SSL being brought up, or is that a separate issue? -- Daniel Ruggeri

SSL and windows with AcceptFilter https none

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
was not able to find a failure where partial content was served - it was all or nothing for me at an SSL connection level. I don't have the expertise to dig into this one, but since several folks have been unable to reproduce the problem, I'll be happy to serve as a testing ground. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: SSL and windows with AcceptFilter https none

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/17/2012 9:49 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: All; I have submitted PR 52476 to track and document this bug. I've uploaded the logs from my tests where I was able to duplicate the problem. http://people.apache.org

Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-01-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
or the other avoids the segfault. This seems to be brought on by the combination of the two (and possibly the engine implementation). Any ideas? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [PATCH] trunk/2.4 core output filter is broken

2012-01-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test? I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff, but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-01-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
there. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [PATCH] trunk/2.4 core output filter is broken

2012-01-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to duplicate the problem were done on the Win7 64 box. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-02-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
remove optomizations from httpd, though... I'm going to try with 0.9.8t and see if anything is different. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-02-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2/2/2012 1:02 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Since this happens with every attempt to start, I suspect it has nothing to do with the new directive and more to do with something I did on the openssl build. I was, indeed, doing something stupid. A build with openssl 1.0.0g replicates the behavior

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-02-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile (currently in trunk and proposed for backport in 2.2) with an engine. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [discuss] Bundle apr/apu with 2.4.x

2012-02-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
, it will be easy enough to choose something like --build-apr=../apr-1.4.5 Can we be sure that the configure script will continue to pass parameters as it does today to these sub configure scripts, too? Also (dare I ask), but where did we end up on the PCRE discussion? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [DISCUSS] Platform docs

2012-02-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
question is whether or not there is an audience to make the effort worthwhile. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RE-VOTE] adoption of mod_firehose MODULE

2012-03-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the in/out format, though (not in this thread, of course). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RE-VOTE #2] adoption of mod_policy subproject

2012-03-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
original intent. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Any suggestions for a presentation at ApacheConNA2012?

2012-03-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-driven approach I want to see if my fellow developers and users had a suggestion for another presentation (or maybe a rewnewal of the cookbook). Any ideas out there? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

2012-03-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2/3/2012 4:57 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2/3/2012 12:27 PM, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: Hmm... the ENGINE code is careful not to shutdown an ENGINE if keys exist which make use of it. So there is a possibility that the some chain verification leaves a reference to an RSA key which

Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)

2012-03-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
between multi-instance configurations where httpd -c /path/to/conf1.conf and httpd -c /path/to/conf2.conf end up pointing to the same file even though they share nothing else in common? Seems like some stepping-on-of-toes would occur unless I'm missing something else obvious. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: printing r-filename for access denied errors

2012-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
a documentroot, or have no idea where /foo/bar/baz is supposed to be in the filesystem) Is there any harm in adding it? This is the rv from a stat in the directory walk. Awesome idea. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Proxy RemoteIP logging

2012-03-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 3/24/2012 5:52 AM, Steffen wrote: I prefer to have it in log level debug, because the config already says that the client IP is forwared. +1 -- Daniel Ruggeri

Fwd: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1 reverse proxy

2012-04-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
I wanted to bring this up here - seems like a few things are going on that are confusing to me. I'll try to look into it when time becomes available, but I thought someone might have an opinion off the bat. Original Message Subject:[users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1

Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 5/4/2012 8:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: [+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation. +1 -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: using X-Forwarded-Host as r-hostname

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
/1.1 Host: whatever.com X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.0.2 X-Forwarded-Host: whatever.com X-Forwarded-Server: testbed.com Connection: Keep-Alive -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Comment system, take two and a half

2012-05-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to be more of a means of contributing to the doc effort. Big +1 to this. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [PATCH] mod_log_forensic security considerations

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. To me, a clear and concise security warning in the documentation should be all that is needed. IMO, having unadulterated logging capability is what makes mod_dumpio/mod_log_forensic some of the most useful modules for troubleshooting in a proxy/crashing scenario (respectively). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [PATCH] mod_log_forensic security considerations

2012-06-08 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
give the administrator the option of disabling certain headers from being printed with the flexibility for that administrator to define a match that can suit every need (headers of various names and cookies of various names being the more recently discussed items). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Comments requested on proposed 2.2 patch - keep or nyx

2012-07-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
pursuing, I can nyx it from the STATUS file. Timing wasn't the best as a lot of us were focused on 2.3 - 2.4 at the time. FWIW, I have been using this update in production environments since it was proposed. Cheers -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
adopt the system, because -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Proposed TR for this Friday

2012-08-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to spare and could take a look? FWIW, I use the patch with engine and non-engine implementations on Linux, AIX and Solaris. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: how to avoid balancer manager nonce?

2012-08-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 8/31/2012 8:45 AM, Eric Covener wrote: Alternatives would be to find a weaker source for the nonce, or allow tto opt out / use a hard-coded one. +1... also, couldn't the nonce get in the way of rest-like calls to the balancer manager to disable/enable/modify members? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1389575 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES

2012-09-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
is used. In the event one backend does not return the X-Load-Factor header, its practical load factor becomes 0. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.0.65

2012-09-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
conversation. I think consensus was 1 year after the first 2.4 release but I don't think I've seen such an announcement (I could have just missed it, too). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
sources? Maybe I can monkey around a bit with the logo to see if I even like my the idea I mention above... -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
than These clothes cleaned by Tide. Could just be me, but that's how I read it. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Want to contribute

2012-10-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the patch there and to this list. After a bit of conversation/tweaking, the patch may be accepted and comitted to trunk by one of us committers or proposed for backport in an existing branch in the STATUS file. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: mod_lbmethod_byrequests required to define a BalancerMember

2012-12-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
into mod_proxy(_balancer) defeats the purpose of loadable balancer modules and documenting the requirement sounds like working around the issue. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
for its maintenance [ +/- 0] don't care won't help [ -1] don't accept mod_macro as a standard module My +1 -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Another +1 -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1435193 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-01-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
: druggeri +covener: minor MMM bump? Thanks for the reminder. I've updated both 2.2 and 2.4 backport proposals. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: *ping* :) (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13) *pong* :) I'm hoping to review those last two on Monday. Been trying for two weeks to get to them! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
be that the persist patch would not work on server-defined balancers if changes are made in the vhost. Other than that, I'm not sure what other inconsistencies and problems would be expected so it's probably worth warning server admins in docs. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
, though. IMHO, that's a much bigger problem. So is that bug supposed to be fixed, or do we roll 2.4.4 without this functionality? I guess it's technically not a regression if it's always been broken. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1436396 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
async? Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1436396 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/21/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-) Aye - that did it! Sorry for the noise - was testing the two patches independently. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
and AH01171: balancer://mycluster: No workers in balancer. I'd say that the former is definitely unexpected but the latter is fairly reasonable. There was a ProxyPassInherit as part of the original patch... maybe that needs to be revisited? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the way things have always been (this is what has been proposed, after all). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [off-topic] ApacheCon is over - thanks for the people I met and the lessons I learned.

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
we're each working/tinkering on at the moment. This will naturally have to be planned in advance, which seems to be where it all failed. I'll do my best to hash out some plans for the next meetup, so we can get down to business and discuss what awesome plans we have for httpd. ++1 -- Daniel

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1031758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c

2013-03-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
=47765 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54616 I can't say I've ever done that, but can you think of a use case where breakage may have come from? Was it maybe something on the IRC channel or a bug report that prompted this? -- Daniel Ruggeri

What to call forcing a worker into error state for IO timeout?

2013-04-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to that as the parameter name? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1466053 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
what is unsafe... -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1467433 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
.patch ... and corrected trunk + notes in STATUS. Thanks, Bill. If that works for you, I've also proposed this in 2.4 and could use votes there, too :) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1467523 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c

2013-04-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
apr_pstrndup(p, buf, k); Will return a string allocated out of the pool instead. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1476688 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
proposed for 2.2 if anyone could spare the time to verify/vote there as well. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Improve mod_proxy's error marking of workers

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to check if the system is healthy. I think you need to screen out 4xx at least to prevent client errors from marking down your backends. There is also failonstatus which, granted, could probably be enhanced to accept ranges instead of just a list to accommodate this need. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: disable pid file writing?

2013-05-08 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the current code also fails startup anyway with the following error: (20014)Internal error: Error retrieving pid file /dev/null Remove it before continuing if it is corrupted. I haven't looked into it any further than that, though. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: T-24:00:00 to 2.0, 2.2 final tags

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Nothing to stall the work, but I'd like to campaign once more for a quick look at the 2.2 backport I have outstanding (which was added to 2.4 already). Cheers -- Daniel Ruggeri Original message From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net Date: 06/20/2013 4:07 PM (GMT-05

Re: T-24:00:00 to 2.0, 2.2 final tags

2013-06-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 6/21/2013 10:19 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:14 -0400 Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: Nothing to stall the work, but I'd like to campaign once more for a quick look at the 2.2 backport I have outstanding (which was added to 2.4 already). Which

Re: [VOTE] The 'RM' Baton

2013-07-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html#how-to-do-a-release -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.6 as GA

2013-07-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
life easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part of the official release. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. +1 on RHEL 5/gcc/x86, Sol 5.10/SUNWspro/sparc, AIX 6.1/XLC/ppc -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: UDS and Balancers

2013-07-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
://socket=%2Fhome%2Fwww%2Fsocket I didn't pursue further than that since it doesn't seem like the functionality would be used a lot in balancers and can be ironed out in future patches if that is desired. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: reverse proxy bind backend connection to request

2013-07-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-not-pooled and proxy-nokeepalive set? Seems like that combo might do what you are hoping for... -- Daniel Ruggeri

Fixing UDS in trunk/2.4 proposal

2013-08-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
: 16348.70 Apache UDS: 14580.92 Apache UDS: 15211.97 Apache TCP: 11859.46 (only got one in) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: uds support

2013-10-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
like using localhost as HTTP host is too restrictive. I'd hate to think that a UDS backend can't implement its own concept of name-based vhosts behind Apache because localhost is forced as the Host header. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Exposing more loggable data from the proxy

2013-10-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. Aside from logging, exporting these as ENV entries to the request allows us to do all sorts of stuff in other modules, too Any thoughts? Is there something I should include or exclude before I begin? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Exposing more loggable data from the proxy

2013-10-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
other attributes that are worth gathering. And yes, SSL led me to the suggestion. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: persisting the slotmem (Was: Re: mod_proxy: maximum hostname length for workers)

2013-11-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
imagine someone (or thing) would go muck with that file... but stranger things have happened on MY file systems :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.7

2013-11-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
a great feature... (yes, I'm guilty in not testing out the latest trunk patches and providing feedback - I had planned to do that last week... and this week... and probably next week) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.2.26 as GA

2013-11-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 11/13/2013 11:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: [X] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Verified on Debian 7.0 wheezy w/ openssl 0.9.8 and php 5.3 as accompaniments -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.7

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
27.81 311.00 77.92% Req/Sec 183.46 32.59 369.00 72.44% Req/Sec 176.81 28.18 325.00 71.99% Three samples with 30 second tests is far from scientific, but I think illustrates general timings (and, more importantly, that it works!). -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/14/2013 9

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.7

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Oops - I copypasta'd the per-thread stats. Total stats for the test follow: httpd: Requests/sec: 4633.17 Requests/sec: 4664.49 Requests/sec: 4657.63 nginx: Requests/sec: 5701.16 Requests/sec: 5798.08 Requests/sec: 5584.60 -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/18/2013 1:09 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.7

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
I tested the original patch with (to keep everything apples to apples). I'll jump in to take a look at this when time is available (next week?) but would like to fish for any immediate thoughts in the mean time. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/18/2013 1:11 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Oops - I copypasta'd

Re: UDS Patch

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
makes sense if * we can reuse the address. I'll have to see what the delta with both patches applied turns out to be... -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: UDS Patch

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
UDS patch + r1543174: Requests/sec: 3774.41 Requests/sec: 3878.02 Requests/sec: 3852.34 Will try to look into this next week... -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/18/2013 6:37 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 11/18/2013 3:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Can you retry with this applied: https

Re: UDS Patch

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/19/2013 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: OK... the DNS lookup code seems to have changed between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1511313 So I'm wondering if there's something there.

Re: UDS Patch

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
over and send that instead. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/22/2013 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Any luck with generating the diff yet? On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The main thing is that it would be interesting to see the diffs between '2.4.6 w the (several

Re: UDS Patch

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
on the frontend targeting a small Node.js backend application... I don't suspect the application is skewing the results because of how consistent the results have been, but I may just remove that from the equation to be absolutely sure. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 12/2/2013 8:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote

Re: UDS Patch

2013-12-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
as well as the string comparison in the critical path is the most likely culprit there... but that's old hat anyway. So, in short, my past test cases were invalid because they included other bottlenecks. Sorry for unnecessary noise! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 12/5/2013 6:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: My

Re: Deprecating (and eventually removing) encrypted private key support in mod_ssl?

2013-12-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Deprecating (and eventually removing) encrypted private key support in mod_ssl?

2013-12-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 12/5/2013 6:17 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 11/14/2013 5:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote: a) people who want the ability to do filesystem backups without exposing private keys to the set of admins who can read such backups; or e.g. stick keys on NFS mounts, a similar requirement there. b) people

Re: Question about Proxy ~ something syntax

2013-12-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
, so it is likely that no one use it - apparently it is equivalent to ProxyMatch +1 -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Looking to TR 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/6/2014 11:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: nuff said :) One more vote for the UDS patch would be appreciated if anyone could spare a moment to have a look. Happy New Year all, BTW. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: mod_ssl: querying any certificate in the chain

2014-01-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
assuming SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_n == SSL_CLIENT_S_DN. Would that be the case? ...or are you counting to n from the other direction? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Looking to TR 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
FYI, I also floated a few patches here that apply directly to 2.4.6 which includes the (many) proposed 2.4.7 patches. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 1/21/2014 8:27 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi, please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101#c19 where a patch is available

Re: UDS support for mod_rewrite

2014-01-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/22/2014 5:48 AM, Juan José Medina Godoy wrote: Do you think that approach is safe or is it likely to break at some point? (relaying on the workers being located by url in that way, without having to provide the socket in the rewrite) Seems safe... and quite clever, actually. -- Daniel

Re: Welcome to Mike Rumph and Yann Ylavic!

2014-02-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2/17/2014 11:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Welcome aboard, and well deserved!! With regards, Daniel. welcome++ (from another Daniel) See you in Denver

Soliciting thoughts about this proposed patch

2010-03-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-starting Application Servers out there. Thank you kindly for your time -Daniel Ruggeri

FixedInTrunk keyword?

2010-04-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. Once that happens, the bug will be closed. Is this accurate? Thank you for your time answering my simple question -Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

2010-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
apologize for polluting the general mailing list with basic process questions. -- Daniel Ruggeri Sander Temme wrote: On Apr 20, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi all; I have a little confusion regarding the FixedInTrunk keyword when applied to a bug. What does it mean? My

Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

2010-05-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
having my submitted patch added to the STATUS file in the 2.2 branch after it has been FixedInTrunk? Thanks -Daniel Ruggeri Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Sander/All; Oh, I see. I guess my next question is how the issue fixed in trunk gets proposed in the STATUS list. I submitted a patch

Proposed change to STATUS to support bug 48939

2010-05-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
+statuses are found +PR: 48939 +Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125view=rev +2.2.x patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25153 + PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED * core: Support wildcards in both the directory and file components of -- -- Daniel

Vote requested

2010-06-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the attention of (Jeff and) the committers in hopes of getting the needed votes. I would appreciate it if anyone could take a moment to review or offer questions/comments. Thank you for your time. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
on the right track, but there are qualms with the implementation, I'll happily adjust the work. Thanks -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
forward (or stay in STATUS). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-07-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice

A gentle reminder

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
are separate modules there) and have both committed for future versions. Thank you for your time -Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r930125 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
as a replacement. Jeff; I will gladly take the tasks you mentioned in STATUS as soon as we have consensus on the name of the directive. It may be a lofty goal but it would be great if this could make it into 2.2.16. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.3 upgrade on apache.org

2010-07-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r930125 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

2010-07-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125view=rev -2.2.x patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25153 +2.2.x patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25788 Submitted by: Daniel Ruggeri DRuggeri primary.net +1: niq, jim -trawick

Re: [PATCH] tproxy2 patch to the apache 2.2.15

2010-08-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
that is not currently available? -- Daniel Ruggeri

  1   2   3   4   >