Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... this has me thinking about maybe using the provider interface to implement the communication mechanism... let me mull this over. > On Nov 30, 2018, at 8:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Yeah, I looked for something else, esp various pubsub implementations, but > they really didn't fit

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yeah, I looked for something else, esp various pubsub implementations, but they really didn't fit in with what was needed. > On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:02 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 29/11/2018 07:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : >>> Hi,

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-29 Thread Mladen Turk
On 27.11.2018. 12:23, Jim Jagielski wrote: In the coming week or so, I will be committing my load balance, load determination and discovery work to a sandbox trunk. Many people have asked for more info, so here we go. Thanks for the info. Like said, I'm for the idea for

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-29 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 29/11/2018 07:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : >> Hi, Jim; >> I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY >> protocol. Any pointers you can share? >> > Hi > > Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, Jim; I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY protocol. Any pointers you can share? Hi Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are looking for. Here are some links:

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Alex Hautequest
How often are nodes updating themselves? Are they only updating their main proxy server or each other in a “multicast” fashion? How about if one of the nodes crash before sending back an update? Are you locking a session to a specific backend host, keep it tracked on the proxy/front end server

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
https://nanomsg.org > On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, Jim; > I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY > protocol. Any pointers you can share? > > I'm also curious what your thoughts are about dealing with growth of the > worker pool

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Michal Karm
On 11/28/2018 02:33 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, Jim; > I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY > protocol. Any pointers you can share? > > I'm also curious what your thoughts are about dealing with growth of the > worker pool beyond the control of the proxy admin.

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-27 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Jim; I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY protocol. Any pointers you can share? I'm also curious what your thoughts are about dealing with growth of the worker pool beyond the control of the proxy admin. For example, if I configure a balancer for 10