CGIs and HEAD requests

2003-01-10 Thread Martin Kutschker
Hi! Is it possible for a CGI to handle HEAD requests? Mozilla uses HEAD for it's 'save link target' feature, which 'breaks' my web app - annoyingly every file (suggested to be downloaded) gets a .html extension as Apches 1.3 sends the default mime type. Is there a way to solve this problem in

Re: [PATCH] A bug in table adjust function that causes a core dump (fwd)

2003-01-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: Can anyone comment on this? shmht in 2.0 is quite unstable, there are several bugs in the table code like the one below (and some more nasty, like an off-by-one overflow) most of which are fixed in later versions of mod_ssl 2.8.

Re: [patch] include/util_filter.h

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:41:38PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: ... As has been mentioned many times before on this list, if a patch isn't committed or commented on, you have to remind us. There are as many whys for this requirement as there are httpd committers trying to

Re: Tagged the tree

2003-01-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
Just discovered a critical error in Apache for NetWare that prevents Apache from being run in protected address space. I have committed the fix in os/netware/util_nw.c in the httpd-2.0 branch. Can this fix be added to the tag? Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading

RE: CGIs and HEAD requests

2003-01-10 Thread Dietz, Phil E.
I just tested HEAD with a CGI and its behaviour is the same from 1.3.2X and 2.0.43 Notice the ETag: line which I have the CGI emit. This is proof that the cgi is being run. apache2.0.43: [root@linux11 htdocs]# telnet linux11 80 Connected to linux11. Escape character is '^]'. HEAD /a.cgi

RE: Tagged the tree

2003-01-10 Thread Sander Striker
From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:48 PM Just discovered a critical error in Apache for NetWare that prevents Apache from being run in protected address space. I have committed the fix in os/netware/util_nw.c in the httpd-2.0 branch. Can this

Re: EOS bucket in RESOURCE filters

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Ames
Stas Bekman wrote: Is it possible that the RESOURCE filters don't get the EOS bucket? anything is possible in software ;-) but that would be pretty broken IMO. I don't recall seeing cases recently where we don't send EOS down the complete output filter chain. I'm working on filter examples

using module

2003-01-10 Thread fabio rohrich
Hi to everybody. I'm developing a module that modify the html content. I have no server at home, so i work on my linux workstation. Can I use a module that modify the file requested from a client on my PC (it's not a server). I mean, I can SetHandler on a location and I can see the module, but if

core.c not handling APR_ENOTIMPL from apr_sendfile

2003-01-10 Thread Allan Edwards
Without this I believe Win98/ME are broken on HEAD and APACHE_2_0_BRANCH. OK to commit? Allan Index: core.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/core.c,v retrieving revision 1.225.2.1 diff -u -d -b -r1.225.2.1 core.c --- core.c

Re: Fwd: Re: Error

2003-01-10 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
not acked. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! ---BeginMessage--- - Start Forwarded Message - Subject: Re: Error Now, if you absolutely MUST contact a real

Re: core.c not handling APR_ENOTIMPL from apr_sendfile

2003-01-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Allen, The test above the block of code... (apr _file_flags_get(fd) APR_SENDFILE_ENABLED) should be false... If you look at the code in Win32's apr_file_open() you will notice the case ELSE_WIN_OS_IS_ANSI causes us to reset the ENABLED bit. I'm much more concerned why that flag isn't reset

Re: Tagged the tree

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Ames
Sander Striker wrote: I'll have some time tonight to tag _PRE3, which we should consider to become .44. I don't know how/what you are planning to tag, but I'd sure like to see my server/core.c patch in there to fix the fd leaks on keepalive connections. Last time I looked, it was the latest

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES configure.in

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Ames
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Thursday, January 09, 2003 16:51:54 -0500 Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * apr-util's make dies with Makefile:23: /tmp/inst_apr/bin/build/rules.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/tmp/inst_apr/bin/build/rules.mk'. Stop. hmmm,

RE: Tagged the tree

2003-01-10 Thread Sander Striker
From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:46 PM Sander Striker wrote: I'll have some time tonight to tag _PRE3, which we should consider to become .44. I don't know how/what you are planning to tag, but I'd sure like to see my server/core.c patch in

Re: Forward port Require file-owner/file-group; need review and help ;-)

2003-01-10 Thread André Malo
* André Malo wrote: that functionality was not ported into 2.x yet. For summary look at the attachment, please ;-) I've created a module mod_authz_owner, which basically ports the functionality, but with some enhancements. Both requirements should work on every system where APR_HAS_USER.