Hi all
I'd like to have a basic authentication with apache http.I want that apache
read user e pwd by a text file and does the authentication.Any Idea on how to
configure it?
Regards
Giovanni
Libero ADSL: 3 mesi gratis e navighi a
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have a basic authentication with apache http.I want that
apache read user e pwd by a text file and does the authentication.Any
Idea on how to configure it?
This is a list for developers. I.e. people who write the apache code; You
want
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:36:01 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:16:31 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
How is SIGALRM used specifically?
e.g.:
eval {
Ok, here you are. If you find it useful, you make me really happy :o)
Regards
Tony
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:08:51 +0100, Antonin Karasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly...
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:56:59 +0100, Antonín Karásek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again. Just hoping to get two simple patches reviewed, tested and
applied. Please take the time if you can. Each patch changes 3-5 lines
or so, and I don't think either will break anything. I've included
links to the bug report, patch and original mail to this list. I've
just checked,
* Antonin Karasek wrote:
Ok, here you are. If you find it useful, you make me really happy :o)
Without a closer look:
* We cannot distribute a program that is licensed under GPL. You would need
to relicense to AL2 and resubmit it. Furthermore I think you would need to
donate the copyright to
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, [iso-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Furthermore I think you would need to donate the copyright to ASF (but
I'm not sure about the latter).
No.
As long as it's licensed under the Apache License version 2, that gives us
the right to redistribute it under the same terms, without
* Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, [iso-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Furthermore I think you would need to donate the copyright to ASF (but
I'm not sure about the latter).
No.
As long as it's licensed under the Apache License version 2, that gives
us the right to redistribute it
The short answer is that it is already fixed in Apache 2.1/2.2.
Unfortunately you have hit on one of the limitations of the Apache 2.0
authentication module structure. The problem is that authorization
types are replicated through multiple authentication modules.
Fortunately this has all been
More bad/good news:
Bad News (?): With the added debugging turned on, we did not manage
to recreate the problem. In fact, we saw no output from the debugging
code (which appears to fire off only in the case of a problem). And
I even added an abort() specifically after the incrementing of nvec
Seems that mod_include can pass empty bucket brigades
down the filter chain. For instance if the first line in
an SSI is !--#include... then SPLIT_AND_PASS_PRETAG_BUCKETS
will pass an empty brigade as the first brigade.
This causes problems with the logic in mod_deflate which
attempts to bypass
--On Wednesday, December 1, 2004 6:44 PM -0500 Allan Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a defensive move, mod_deflate could just check for
APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY and immediately return APR_SUCCESS.
Or we could put checks in mod_include to prevent passing
empty buckets in the first place (I think
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You should really take a look at the trunk. =)
This has been fixed for many months. -- justin
Ah, I see it now! Thanks for the quick feedback Justin.
Allan
Jeff Trawick wrote:
[...]
1) what would be the best place to document that in the Apache docs (mpm
include/ap_mpm.h or should each mpm have it documented separately?
how about at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/
- http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/thread_safety.html
That
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/10/30 13:20:38 $]
Release:
1.3.34-dev: In development.
1.3.33: Tagged October 27, 2004
1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not formally released.
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/11/10 18:05:46 $]
Release:
2.0.53 : in development
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
2.0.51 : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/11/06 08:28:24 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.1 : Proposed roll on 11/14/2004 (around/after Hackathon).
Justin volunteers as
OK, I'm not interested in licences - I simply want to give my work to
other people...
So, here you are the relicenced program...
Regards
Tony
André Malo wrote:
* Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, [iso-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Furthermore I think you would need to donate the
I'm sory, please ignore the last mail. There is a bug in the licence.
Here is the correct file
André Malo wrote:
* Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, [iso-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Furthermore I think you would need to donate the copyright to ASF (but
I'm not sure about the latter).
Stas Bekman wrote:
[snip]
Alternatively one could use a manager thread that implements
something like a thread-specific alarm(), where a signal handler
running on the interrupted thread does siglongjmp() to break out of
the interrupted processing, but implementing that sort of service is
not
Ok, here's my first crack at a quick n dirty cookies test.
The new test is t/cookies.t, and it's supporting server file is
t/htdocs/cgi-bin/cookies.pl. I figured the extra cgi-bin directory was
good for sanity sake.
I've also included the necessary patches to MANIFEST and extra.conf.in
against
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ is outdated (s/cvs/svn/)... thanks.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ is outdated (s/cvs/svn/)... thanks.
I just changed, via svn, the site/docs/test/index.html and
site/xdocs/test/index.xml pages to reflect this.
However, I just wanted to verify that, to get the
changes on the site itself, one
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ is outdated (s/cvs/svn/)... thanks.
I just changed, via svn, the site/docs/test/index.html and
site/xdocs/test/index.xml pages to reflect this.
Thanks Randy
However, I just wanted to verify that, to get the
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Thanks, Chris, committed with a few small adjustements. You can see
the commits here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109277
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109279
Thanks. Glad to contribute. It looks like the only change was naming the
cookies.pl
Stas Bekman wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Thanks, Chris, committed with a few small adjustements. You can see
the commits here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109277
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109279
Thanks. Glad to contribute. It looks like the only change was
Hello!
I checked the archived mailing lists but didn't find any references to
this question. I had one hit in Google, but it was someone asking
basically the same question and there was no answer in the thread. So here
I go, hope someone can help!
I first tried to build Apache::Test v1.16
This is mostly off topic, but I wanted to get thoughts from the
committers on how they're liking the conversion from CVS to SVN so far.
What do you really like/hate about it vs. CVS?
I've been toying around with the idea of moving that way at home. I'm
not to sure I'm keen having to use copy
Stas Bekman wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Ok, here's my first crack at a quick n dirty cookies test.
The new test is t/cookies.t, and it's supporting server file is
t/htdocs/cgi-bin/cookies.pl. I figured the extra cgi-bin directory was
good for sanity sake.
I've also included the necessary
29 matches
Mail list logo
