Proxy and rewrite ordering

In mod_rewrite.c, I see ap_hook_translate_name(hook_uri2file, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST); In mod_proxy.c, I see /* fixup before mod_rewrite, so that the proxied url will not * escaped accidentally by our fixup. */ static const char * const aszSucc[]={ mod_rewrite.c, NULL };

Corrected: Proxy and rewrite ordering

[my previous post contained some irrelevant observations I thought I'd deleted. Reposting to reduce confusion] In mod_rewrite.c, I see ap_hook_translate_name(hook_uri2file, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST); In mod_proxy.c, I see /* fixup before mod_rewrite, so that the proxied url will not

conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

(ignore issues of support for particular versions of Apache) google pretends to know a lot about this general question, but it seems to be in discussions between general users with the same curiosity and there is little or no developer input. OTOH, there is a great indication that Tomcat

Re: Corrected: Proxy and rewrite ordering

On 05/27/2006 02:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote: [my previous post contained some irrelevant observations I thought I'd deleted. Reposting to reduce confusion] In mod_rewrite.c, I see ap_hook_translate_name(hook_uri2file, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST); In mod_proxy.c, I see /* fixup

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

On 05/27/2006 03:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Are there still fundamental pieces missing from mod_proxy_ajp + mod_proxy_balancer which have to be resolved before mod_proxy_ajp is the natural solution for anybody on Apache = 2.2? Currently mod_proxy_balancer lacks the domain feature of

Re: Corrected: Proxy and rewrite ordering

On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:40, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Sorry for being confused, but as far as I read the line above mod_rewrite runs *before* mod_proxy in the translate_name hook. It actually runs *after* mod_rewrite in the fixup hook: Bah. [mutter]. Harumph! Oh well, nevermind. Serves me

Re: [PATCH] properly set the parent pid on shutdown

Davi Arnaut wrote: On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:48:05 -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 on visual review. Anyone have a win9x install handy to verify that this works? Sorry, none of my multiboots still boot 9x. I've personally tested it on WIN98 (virtual machine). Just a

[PATCH] No temporary file left behind

Hi, Remove mod_disk_cache temporary files when rename() fails, otherwise they may accumulate in excess. -- Davi Arnaut Index: modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c === --- modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c (revision 409900) +++